Estimate Standard Error From Confidence Interval
Contents |
normal distribution calculator to find the value of z to use for a confidence interval Compute a confidence interval on the mean when σ is known Determine whether to use a t distribution or a normal distribution Compute a
Confidence Interval Estimate Of Standard Deviation Calculator
confidence interval on the mean when σ is estimated View Multimedia Version When calculate confidence interval from standard error in r you compute a confidence interval on the mean, you compute the mean of a sample in order to estimate the mean standard error of measurement confidence interval of the population. Clearly, if you already knew the population mean, there would be no need for a confidence interval. However, to explain how confidence intervals are constructed, we are going to work backwards
Standard Error And Confidence Interval Width
and begin by assuming characteristics of the population. Then we will show how sample data can be used to construct a confidence interval. Assume that the weights of 10-year-old children are normally distributed with a mean of 90 and a standard deviation of 36. What is the sampling distribution of the mean for a sample size of 9? Recall from the section on the sampling distribution of the mean
Margin Of Error Confidence Interval
that the mean of the sampling distribution is μ and the standard error of the mean is For the present example, the sampling distribution of the mean has a mean of 90 and a standard deviation of 36/3 = 12. Note that the standard deviation of a sampling distribution is its standard error. Figure 1 shows this distribution. The shaded area represents the middle 95% of the distribution and stretches from 66.48 to 113.52. These limits were computed by adding and subtracting 1.96 standard deviations to/from the mean of 90 as follows: 90 - (1.96)(12) = 66.48 90 + (1.96)(12) = 113.52 The value of 1.96 is based on the fact that 95% of the area of a normal distribution is within 1.96 standard deviations of the mean; 12 is the standard error of the mean. Figure 1. The sampling distribution of the mean for N=9. The middle 95% of the distribution is shaded. Figure 1 shows that 95% of the means are no more than 23.52 units (1.96 standard deviations) from the mean of 90. Now consider the probability that a sample mean computed in a random sample is within 23.52 units of the population mean of 90. Since 95% of the dist
ratio measures are performed calculate confidence interval t test on the natural log scale (see Chapter 9, Section 9.2.7). For a ratio http://onlinestatbook.com/2/estimation/mean.html measure, such as a risk ratio, odds ratio or hazard ratio (which we will denote generically as RR here), first calculate lower limit = ln(lower confidence limit http://handbook.cochrane.org/chapter_7/7_7_7_3_obtaining_standard_errors_from_confidence_intervals_and.htm given for RR) upper limit = ln(upper confidence limit given for RR) intervention effect estimate = lnRR Then the formulae in Section 7.7.7.2 can be used. Note that the standard error refers to the log of the ratio measure. When using the generic inverse variance method in RevMan, the data should be entered on the natural log scale, that is as lnRR and the standard error of lnRR, as calculated here (see Chapter 9, Section 9.4.3).
login Login Username * Password * Forgot your sign in details? Need to activate BMA members Sign in via OpenAthens Sign in via your institution Edition: International US UK South Asia http://www.bmj.com/content/343/bmj.d2304 Toggle navigation The BMJ logo Site map Search Search form SearchSearch Advanced search Search responses Search blogs Toggle top menu ResearchAt a glance Research papers Research methods and reporting Minerva Research news EducationAt a glance Clinical reviews http://www.healthknowledge.org.uk/e-learning/statistical-methods/practitioners/standard-error-confidence-intervals Practice Minerva Endgames State of the art News & ViewsAt a glance News Features Editorials Analysis Observations Head to head Editor's choice Letters Obituaries Views and reviews Rapid responses Campaigns Archive For authors Jobs Hosted Research confidence interval How to obtain the P... How to obtain the P value from a confidence interval Research Methods & Reporting Statistics Notes How to obtain the P value from a confidence interval BMJ 2011; 343 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d2304 (Published 08 August 2011) Cite this as: BMJ 2011;343:d2304 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Douglas G Altman, professor of statistics in medicine 1, J Martin Bland, professor of health statistics21Centre for Statistics in Medicine, calculate confidence interval University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6UD2Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DDCorrespondence to: D G Altman doug.altman{at}csm.ox.ac.ukWe have shown in a previous Statistics Note1 how we can calculate a confidence interval (CI) from a P value. Some published articles report confidence intervals, but do not give corresponding P values. Here we show how a confidence interval can be used to calculate a P value, should this be required. This might also be useful when the P value is given only imprecisely (eg, as P<0.05). Wherever they can be calculated, we are advocates of confidence intervals as much more useful than P values, but we like to be helpful. The method is outlined in the box below in which we have distinguished two cases.Steps to obtain the P value from the CI for an estimate of effect (Est) (a) P from CI for a differenceIf the upper and lower limits of a 95% CI are u and l respectively: 1 calculate the standard error: SE = (u − l)/(2×1.96) 2 calculate the test statistic: z = Est/SE 3 calculate the P value2: P = exp(−0.717×z − 0.416×z2). (b) P from CI for a ratioFor a ratio measure, such as a risk ratio, the above formulas should be used with the estimate Est an
DisclaimerPublic Health TextbookResearch Methods1a - Epidemiology1b - Statistical Methods1c - Health Care Evaluation and Health Needs Assessment1d - Qualitative MethodsDisease Causation and Diagnostic2a - Epidemiological Paradigms2b - Epidemiology of Diseases of Public Health Significance2c - Diagnosis and Screening2d - Genetics2e - Health and Social Behaviour2f - Environment2g - Communicable Disease2h - Principles and Practice of Health Promotion2i - Disease Prevention, Models of Behaviour ChangeHealth Information3a - Populations3b - Sickness and Health3c - ApplicationsMedical Sociology, Policy and Economics4a - Concepts of Health and Illness and Aetiology of Illness4b - Health Care4c - Equality, Equity and Policy4d - Health EconomicsOrganisation and Management5a - Understanding Individuals,Teams and their Development5b - Understanding Organisations, their Functions and Structure5c - Management and Change5d - Understanding the Theory and Process of Strategy Development5e - Finance, Management Accounting and Relevant Theoretical ApproachesFurther ResourcesFrameworks For Answering QuestionsGeneral Advice for Part APast Papers (available on the FPH website)Text CoursesEpidemiologyEpidemiology for PractitionersEpidemiology for SpecialistsHealth InformationApplications of health information for practitionersApplications of health information for specialistsPopulation health information for practitionersPopulation health information for specialistsSickness and health for practitionersSickness and Health Information for specialistsStatistical MethodsStatistical methods for practitionersStatistical methods for specialistsVideo CoursesIntroductionFinding and Appraising the Evidence1. Overall Introduction to Critical Appraisal2. Finding the Evidence3. Randomised Control Trials4. Systematic Reviews5. Economic Evaluations6. Making Sense of ResultsLearning from StakeholdersIntroductionChapter 1 – Stakeholder engagementChapter 2 – Reasons for engaging stakeholdersChapter 3 – Identifying appropriate stakeholdersChapter 4 – Understanding engagement methodsChapter 5 – Using engagement methods, P1Chapter 5 – Using engagement methods, P2Chapter 6 – Analysing the dataChapter 7