Error Correction Code In Data Link Layer
Contents |
citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (August 2008) (Learn how and error detection and correction in data link layer when to remove this template message) In information theory error detection and correction in data link layer ppt and coding theory with applications in computer science and telecommunication, error detection and correction or data link layer error detection and correction pdf error control are techniques that enable reliable delivery of digital data over unreliable communication channels. Many communication channels are subject to channel noise, and
Error Detection And Correction Techniques In Data Link Layer
thus errors may be introduced during transmission from the source to a receiver. Error detection techniques allow detecting such errors, while error correction enables reconstruction of the original data in many cases. Contents 1 Definitions 2 History 3 Introduction 4 Implementation 5 Error detection schemes 5.1 Repetition codes 5.2 error control in data link layer Parity bits 5.3 Checksums 5.4 Cyclic redundancy checks (CRCs) 5.5 Cryptographic hash functions 5.6 Error-correcting codes 6 Error correction 6.1 Automatic repeat request (ARQ) 6.2 Error-correcting code 6.3 Hybrid schemes 7 Applications 7.1 Internet 7.2 Deep-space telecommunications 7.3 Satellite broadcasting (DVB) 7.4 Data storage 7.5 Error-correcting memory 8 See also 9 References 10 Further reading 11 External links Definitions[edit] The general definitions of the terms are as follows: Error detection is the detection of errors caused by noise or other impairments during transmission from the transmitter to the receiver. Error correction is the detection of errors and reconstruction of the original, error-free data. History[edit] The modern development of error-correcting codes in 1947 is due to Richard W. Hamming.[1] A description of Hamming's code appeared in Claude Shannon's A Mathematical Theory of Communication[2] and was quickly generalized by Marcel J. E. Golay.[3] Introduction[edit] The gene
called frames. Note that frames are nothing more than ``packets'' or ``messages''. By convention, we'll use the term ``frames'' when discussing DLL packets. Sender checksums the frame and sends checksum together with data. The checksum allows error correction code example the receiver to determine when a frame has been damaged in transit. Receiver recomputes
Error Correction Code Flash Memory
the checksum and compares it with the received value. If they differ, an error has occurred and the frame is discarded.
Error Correction Code Calculator
Perhaps return a positive or negative acknowledgment to the sender. A positive acknowledgment indicate the frame was received without errors, while a negative acknowledgment indicates the opposite. Flow control. Prevent a fast sender from overwhelming https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Error_detection_and_correction a slower receiver. For example, a supercomputer can easily generate data faster than a PC can consume it. In general, provide service to the network layer. The network layer wants to be able to send packets to its neighbors without worrying about the details of getting it there in one piece. At least, the above is what the OSI reference model suggests. As we will see later, not everyone agrees https://web.cs.wpi.edu/~cs4514/b98/week3-dll/week3-dll.html that the data link layer should perform all these tasks. Design Issues If we don't follow the OSI reference model as gospel, we can imagine providing several alternative service semantics: Reliable Delivery: Frames are delivered to the receiver reliably and in the same order as generated by the sender. Connection state keeps track of sending order and which frames require retransmission. For example, receiver state includes which frames have been received, which ones have not, etc. Best Effort: The receiver does not return acknowledgments to the sender, so the sender has no way of knowing if a frame has been successfully delivered. When would such a service be appropriate? When higher layers can recover from errors with little loss in performance. That is, when errors are so infrequent that there is little to be gained by the data link layer performing the recovery. It is just as easy to have higher layers deal with occasional lost packet. For real-time applications requiring ``better never than late'' semantics. Old data may be worse than no data. For example, should an airplane bother calculating the proper wing flap angle using old altitude and wind speed data when newer data is already available? Acknowledged Delivery: The receiver returns an acknowledgment frame to the sender
neighboring node - are two services often provided by the data link layer. We saw in Chapter 3 that error detection and correction services are also often offered at the transport layer http://www.ic.uff.br/~michael/kr1999/5-datalink/5_02-ec.htm as well. In this section, we'll examine a few of the simplest techniques that can be used to detect and, in some cases, correct such bit errors. A full treatment of the theory and implementation of this topic is itself the topic of many textbooks (e.g., [Schwartz 1980]), and our treatment here is necessarily brief. Our goal here is to develop an intuitive feel for the capabilities data link that error detection and correction techniques provide, and to see how a few simple techniques work and are used in practice in the data link layer. Figure 5.2-1 illustrates the setting for our study. At the sending node, data, D, to be "protected" against bit errors is augmented with error detection and correction bits, EDC. Typically, the data to be protected includes not only the datagram passed down data link layer from the network layer for transmission across the link, but also link-level addressing information, sequence numbers, and other fields in the data link frame header. Both D and EDC are sent to the receiving node in a link-level frame. At the receiving node, a sequence of bits, D' and EDC' are received. Note that D' and EDC' may differ from the original D and EDC as a result of in-transit bit flips. Figure 5.2-1: Error detection and correction scenario The receiver's challenge is to determine whether or not D' is the same as the original D, given that it has only received D' and EDC'. The exact wording of the receiver's decision in Figure 5.2-1 (we ask whether an error is detected, not whether an error has occurred!) is important. Error detection and correction techniques allow the receiver to sometimes, but not always, detect that bit errors have occurred. That is, even with the use of error detection bits there will still be a possibility that undetected bit errors will occur, i.e., that the receiver will be unaware that the received information contains bit errors. As a consequence, the receiver might deliver a corrupted datagram to the network laye
be down. Please try the request again. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Generated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 04:41:11 GMT by s_ac15 (squid/3.5.20)