Latex Package Amsmath Error Erroneous Nesting Of Equation Structures

here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting

Arrhenius Equation Chemistry

ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join align equation left latex the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 6.2 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a align equation latex minute: Sign up “Erroneous nesting of equation structures” in using “\begin{align}” in a multi-line equation in rmarkdown to knit+pandoc pdf up vote 8 down vote favorite 1 I am writing some multi-line equations in R Markdown - LaTeX, using auto-numbering and

Erroneous Equation Chemistry

\begin{align}. Here's a working the example: --- title: "test" output: html_document --- (@eq01) $$ \begin{align} y = x^2 \\ y = x^3 \\ y = \sqrt[2]{x} \end{align} $$ This works great when the output is html_document. Here's the result: But when I change the output document to pdf: output: pdf_document I get the following error (I am using RStudio latest Version 0.98.1056): I've been trying to read the documentation as suggested in the error message, but I do not seem to get

Large Parentheses Latex

a handle on it. I've checked Stack Overflow and Google and although there are some related posts/questions (for example here, here, here), none of them solve the problem (or apply to my problem). I've also tried to tweak everything. The most evident solution would be to get rid of the \begin{align} environment, (@eq01) $$ y = x^2 \\ y = x^3 \\ y = \sqrt[2]{x} $$ but it does not work for two reasons. First, the html version does not work as nicely because the auto-numbering does not appear centered in the multi-line equation, but rather on the first line (and I don't like it like that). Second, although the pdf version in this case does compile and produce the pdf, it does not recognize that it is a multi-line equation (it's like it does not recognize the new line command \). Any ideas are really appreciated. I've been struggling with this for a while and I cannot find a solution. I kinda love R Markdown because it really integrates the analysis with writing and communicating in a single tool (rather than using many different tools going back and forth). However, it seems there is still a long way to go before we can write one single source file and that it renders appropriately in several different output formats. r latex knitr rstudio rmarkdown share|improve this question asked Sep 25 '14 at 23:29 Hernando Casas 564415 1 Try and remove the outer $$...$$, s

here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or online latex posting ads with us TeX - LaTeX Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top How to show two groups of equations side by side: one implies the other? up vote http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26049762/erroneous-nesting-of-equation-structures-in-using-beginalign-in-a-multi-l 11 down vote favorite 4 I would like to show a bunch of equations can imply another bunch of equations, with double right arrow in between. Here are two trials of mine: one is to use another level of math mode to enclose the two groups of equations, and the other is to use a table with each group of equation being in a cell. The first one $$ \begin{align*} \nabla f(x) -\mu X^{-1} e + A(x) \lambda - z = 0, \\ c(x) = http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/34749/how-to-show-two-groups-of-equations-side-by-side-one-implies-the-other 0, \\ -\mu X^{-1} e + z = 0, \\ x > 0 \\ z > 0 \end{align*} \quad \Longrightarrow \quad \begin{align*} \nabla f(x) + A(x) \lambda - 2z = 0, \\ c(x) = 0, \\ -\mu X^{-1} e + z = 0, \\ x > 0 \\ z > 0 \\ \end{align*} $$ This one will leads to error amsmath: Erroneous nesting of equation structures;(amsmath) trying to recover with `aligned'. \end{align*} Another is using tabular: \begin{tabular*}{c c c} \begin{align*} \nabla f(x) -\mu X^{-1} e + A(x) \lambda - z = 0, \\ c(x) = 0, \\ -\mu X^{-1} e + z = 0, \\ x > 0 \\ z > 0 \end{align*} & $\Longrightarrow$ & \begin{align*} \nabla f(x) + A(x) \lambda - 2z = 0, \\ c(x) = 0, \\ -\mu X^{-1} e + z = 0, \\ x > 0 \\ z > 0 \\ \end{align*} \end{tabular*} It doesn't compile either. I wonder how to make the two approaches workable, and if there are other better ways? equations amsmath share|improve this question edited Nov 14 '11 at 5:39 lockstep 161k38485645 asked Nov 14 '11 at 2:10 Tim 2,20872545 add a comment| 4 Answers 4 active oldest votes up vote 10 down vote accepted Here is another approach, with some braces added to "combine" the separate equation sets. Of course, these can be removed if needed. Each equation set is aligned along the binary relations in an rcl (right-center-left) fashion with the appropriate spacing. \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath}% http://ctan.org/pkg/amsmath \begin{document} \begin{align*} \left.

Sign in Pricing Blog Support Search GitHub This repository Watch 161 Star 3,477 Fork 543 mathjax/MathJax Code Issues 221 Pull requests 0 Projects 0 Wiki Pulse Graphs New issue Misaligns \begin{split} inside https://github.com/mathjax/MathJax/issues/390 \begin{align} #390 Open andersk opened this Issue Feb 8, 2013 · 3 comments Projects None yet Labels Accepted Milestone MathJax v3.0 Assignees No one assigned 3 participants andersk commented Feb 8, 2013 Real LaTeX alows a split environment inside an align environment to share the same alignment points, but MathJax 2.1 doesn’t. Compare the renderings of \begin{align} \begin{split} a & = b + c equation chemistry - d \\ & \quad + e - f \end{split} \\ g + h & = i \end{align} MathJax member dpvc commented Feb 11, 2013 Hmmm. When I try your example in LaTeX with the ams art class, I get ! Package amsmath Error: Erroneous nesting of equation structures; (amsmath) trying to recover with `aligned'. followed later by Package amsmath Warning: Cannot use `split' here; (amsmath) trying to latex package amsmath recover with `aligned' on input line 21. Perhaps you are using a package that improves split and align behavior? If so, can you tell me which one? Can you provide a complete example .tex file that does what you want? andersk commented Feb 11, 2013 That’s weird. No, no other packages. Here’s a complete file that works for me on both Debian stable and Ubuntu raring. \documentclass{amsart} \begin{document} \begin{align} \begin{split} a & = b + c - d \\ & \quad + e - f \end{split} \\ g + h & = i \end{align} \end{document} And the amsmath documentation says this is allowed: Unlike the other amsmath equation structures, the split environment provides no numbering, because it is intended to be used only inside some other displayed equation structure, usually an equation, align, or gather environment, which provides the numbering. (Perhaps you accidentally put my align inside yet another equation structure like \[…\]?) MathJax member dpvc commented Feb 11, 2013 Thanks, that one worked. Not sure what I did wrong. I think I had it in $$...$$, so that must be it, as you suggest. So now I see what you are requesting, but this is going to be hard to a