Error 403 Access Is Precluded By Configuration
Contents |
accessing the
Auth-constraint
FileNet Application Engine Workplace Technote (troubleshooting) Problem(Abstract) Getting Error login-config auth-method 403: Access is precluded by configuration, when accessing the FileNet Application Engine web-resource-collection Workplace installed as Container-Managed Authentication. Cause The Workplace web.xml located in the
Jsp:usebean
The
a Web resource, the transport guarantee, the login configuration, and a security role. Specifying Security Constraints. Security constraints are a declarative way of defining the protection of web content. A security constraint associates authorization and or user data constraints with HTTP operations on web resources. A security constraint, which is represented by security-constraint in deployment descriptor, consists of the following elements: web resource collection (web-resource-collection in deployment descriptor) authorization constraint (auth-constraint in deployment descriptor) user data constraint (user-data-constraint in deployment descriptor) A security constraint that does not contain an authorization constraint shall combine with authorization http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21699241 constraints that name or imply roles to allow unauthenticated access. The special case of an authorization constraint that names NO roles shall combine with any other constraints to OVERRIDE their affects and cause access to be PRECLUDED. The HTTP operations and web resources to which a security constraint applies (i.e. the constrained requests) are identified by one or more web resource collections. A http://java.boot.by/wcd-guide/ch05s02.html web resource collection consists of the following elements: URL patterns (url-pattern in deployment descriptor) HTTP methods (http-method in deployment descriptor) An authorization constraint establishes a requirement for authentication and names the authorization roles permitted to perform the constrained requests. A user must be a member of at least one of the named roles to be permitted to perform the constrained requests. The special role name '*' is a shorthand for all role names defined in the deployment descriptor. An authorization constraint that names NO roles indicates that access to the constrained requests MUST NOT be permitted under any circumstances. An authorization constraint consists of the following element: role name (role-name in deployment descriptor) A user data constraint establishes a requirement that the constrained requests be received over a protected transport layer connection. The strength of the required protection is defined by the value of the transport guarantee. A transport guarantee of INTEGRAL is used to establish a requirement for content integrity and a transport guarantee of CONFIDENTIAL is used to establish a requirement for confidentiality. The transport guarantee of NONE indicates that the container must accept
×35,569 rational-quality-manager ×8,342 clm ×4,222 rational-requirements-composer ×3,701 administration ×3,228 jazz-foundation ×2,869 security ×17 Asked: Mar 06 '14, https://jazz.net/forum/questions/144513/security-vulnerablility-not-resolved-by-clm-406 7:09 a.m. Seen: 2,216 times Last updated: Mar 07 '14, http://www.greenhills.co.uk/2012/12/25/s3cmd-with-iam-roles.html 12:23 p.m. Related questions How do I reference the data warehouse "Database Table Space Folder" property when it is on a separate server? Installation steps? CLM 4.x & WAS 8.x Create New Project by "Create Lifecycle Project" . not success copying error 403 role and permission Create Full traceability report in CLM 4.0 Space allocation for Project in CLM Where I can download 4.0.4 help content (CLM4.0.4_updateSite.zip) ? How do I configure CLM roles if my corporate LDAP is "locked down" and I can't create LDAP groups? What is the recommended maintence tasks for CLM error 403 access V5 and V6 Project description using LPA Setting global notification in web UI? FAQ - How this Forum works Security Vulnerablility NOT resolved by CLM 4.0.6?? 0 Robin Parker (326●2●29●33) | asked Mar 06 '14, 7:09 a.m. Hi all, I was emailed about a Security Bulletin today: http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21664566 If you follow the various links in the Remediation/Fixes section you eventually get to this page: How to block the Install URL from being accessed with CLM I tested our 4.0.5 server using the Verification Testing section of this second page and confirmed that we weren't getting the 403 error. I decided I'd best kick off the upgrade to 4.0.6 process a.s.a.p. I upgraded our test server from 4.0.5 to 4.0.6 and noticed that when I performed the Verification Testing again on the upgraded 4.0.6 server I still wasn't getting the 403 error as expected. Does this mean that in fact the vulnerability exi
via instance user data at instance creation time, but that's somewhat inconvenient, and instance data cannot be changed after the instance has started. You can pass them in by pre-loading on an AMI, but that's even more hassle and static. Or you can have the instance fetch them from somewhere else at boot time, for example through CloudInit, but that then only moves the problem because you then need to secure that fetch. And of course you can copy credentials to the instance after it has booted, but then you have to wait until the ssh sever has regenerated its keys, and you must have security groups and VPC routes to allow access, and it precludes you running an instance manually from the AWS Console. I've ignored that problem for a while, simply relying on Chef to distribute credentials. But for a current project I'm trying to do without custom AMIs and a Chef server: I want to run an instance, and have it do some setup and secure configuration at creation time. For example, it could setup an OpenVPN server in a VPC, or could create a shared secret for Chef Encrypted Data Bags prior to registering as a Chef client. In June 2012, AWS announced IAM roles for EC2 instances – Simplified Secure Access to AWS service APIs from EC2 which addresses this very use case: it allows you to pass IAM credentials to instances. So my plan was: make credentials available to the instance, using IAM roles create a script to download further scripts and credentials from a private S3 bucket fetch and execute this script at boot time, using CloudInit Creating the IAM Role For the first step, the user guide has a section Granting Applications that Run on Amazon EC2 Instances Access to AWS Resources which explains the approach, and illustrates it with a video that uses the AWS Console. I prefer doing IAM configuration from the command-line, so that I can document and script it more easily, and track changes in a git repo. What is not obvious is that when you use the command line, you need to expl