Error 5728
Contents |
Posted: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 @ 12:36:09 GMT
Teradata 5728 Error Code
helps. Otherwise provide the DDLs and the sample row that you are trying to insert. 5728 teradata partition by range_n Partitioning violation for table %DBID.%TVMID. Explanation: 1) An insert or update occurred to a table whose primary index partitioning definition does not allow that data. Or, 2) an ALTER TABLE statement attempted to alter the primary index partitioning but there are existing rows that are not allowed by the new partitioning expression and a WITH DELETE/INSERT clause was not specified. For rows of a table with a partitioned primary index, there is an implied check constraint of "(CAST((partitioning expression ) AS INTEGER) ) BETWEEN 1 and max" where max is 65535 or smaller. The CAST is not included if the partitioning expression is already INTEGER. A smaller value for max is used when the partitioning expression consists solely of a RANGE_N or CASE_N function; in that case, max is the number of ranges/partitions defined by the function. Note that if the partitioning expression results in NULL, the constraint is violated. A row that violates this constraint is not allowed to occur in the table and, therefore, cannot be inserted into the table or, for an update, replace a row in the table. Additionally, if an existing row violates a new partitioning expression and a WITH DELETE/INSERT clause is not specified for the ALTER TABLE statement, the new partitioning cannot be applied. %TVMID indicates the table with the partitioning constraint violation. %DBID indicates the database containing the table. Generated By: STP modules. For Whom: End User. Remedy: For 1), correct the values of the columns referenced in the partitioning expression and resubmit the request. For 2), alter the table with a new partitioning expression that allows for all existing rows or use a WITH DELETE/INSERT clause. With Regards, Rajesh Jain
for table %DBID.%TVMID. Teradata code 5728 Partitioning violation for table %DBID.%TVMID. Error description error explanation... Explanation: 1) An insert or update occurred to a table whose primary index partitioning definition does not allow that data. Or, 2) an ALTER TABLE statement attempted to alter the primary index partitioning but there are existing rows that are not allowed by the new partitioning expression and a WITH DELETE/INSERT clause was not specified. For rows of a table http://teradataforum.com/teradata/20070611_123609.htm with a single-level, 2-byte partitioned primary index, there is an implied check constraint of (CAST((partitioning expression ) AS INTEGER) ) BETWEEN 1 AND max where max is 65535 or smaller. The CAST is not included if the partitioning expression is already INTEGER or consists solely of a RANGE_N function. A smaller value for max is http://teradataerror.com/5728-Partitioning-violation-for-table-DBIDTVMID.html used when the partitioning expression consists solely of a RANGE_N or CASE_N function; in that case, max is the number of ranges/partitions defined by the function. Note that if the partitioning expression results in NULL, the constraint is violated. For rows of a table with a multilevel or 8-byte partitioned primary index, there is an implied check constraint of partitioning_expression_1 IS NOT NULL [AND partitioning_expression_n IS NOT NULL].... A row that violates this constraint is not allowed to occur in the table and, therefore, cannot be inserted into the table or, for an update, replace a row in the table. Additionally, if an existing row violates a new partitioning expression and a WITH DELETE/INSERT clause is not specified for the ALTER TABLE statement, the new partitioning cannot be applied. %TVMID indicates the table with the partitioning constraint violation. %DBID indicates the database containing the table. **DR62813-bessc** Generated By: STP modules. For Whom: End User. Remedy: For 1), correct the values of t
Tag: 5728 Partitioning violation for table ID.%TVMID. Teradata SQL Error and Failure Codes from Error 5727 To 5734 March 13, 2015 SQLServerF1 Leave a comment http://www.sqlserverf1.com/tag/5728-partitioning-violation-for-table-id-tvmid/ 5727 Missing the last range end. Explanation: For a RANGE_N function or an ALTER TABLE, the last range must specify a range end preceded by the keyword AND. **DR62813-bessc** Generated https://github.com/godotengine/godot/issues/5728 By: RES modules. For Whom: End User. **DR62813-bessc** Remedy: Examine the SQL statement and verify that the request is correct. Change the statement to adhere to the RANGE_N function error 5728 rules and resubmit the request. 5728 Partitioning violation for table %DBID.%TVMID. Explanation: 1) An insert or update occurred to a table whose primary index partitioning definition does not allow that data. Or, 2) an ALTER TABLE statement attempted to alter the primary index partitioning but there are existing rows that are not allowed by the new partitioning expression and a teradata 5728 error WITH DELETE/INSERT clause was not specified. For rows of a table with a single-level, 2-byte partitioned primary index, there is an implied check constraint of "(CAST((partitioning expression ) AS INTEGER) ) BETWEEN 1 AND max" where max is 65535 or smaller. The CAST is not included if the partitioning expression is already INTEGER or consists solely of a RANGE_N function. A smaller value for max is used when the partitioning expression consists solely of a RANGE_N or CASE_N function; in that case, max is the number of ranges/partitions defined by the function. Note that if the partitioning expression results in NULL, the constraint is violated. For rows of a table with a multilevel or 8-byte partitioned primary index, there is an implied check constraint of "partitioning_expression_1 IS NOT NULL [AND partitioning_expression_n IS NOT NULL]…". A row that violates this constraint is not allowed to occur in the table and, therefore, cannot be inserted into the table or, for an update, replace a row in the table. Additionally, if an existing row violates a new partitioning
Sign in Pricing Blog Support Search GitHub This repository Watch 700 Star 6,698 Fork 1,747 godotengine/godot Code Issues 1,356 Pull requests 66 Projects 0 Pulse Graphs New issue "Save Scene As" causes "No loader found for resource"Error #5728 Closed amkk opened this Issue Jul 15, 2016 · 3 comments Projects None yet Labels bug hacktoberfest topic:editor Milestone 2.1 Assignees No one assigned 4 participants amkk commented Jul 15, 2016 Operating] system or device - Godot version: Windows7 64bit tested on 2.1beta and latest head. Issue description (what happened, and what was expected): "Save Scene As" causes "No loader found for resource" Error in console. Steps to reproduce: This is only happen when Editor setting "Save path as relative" is checked. You can use "3d_in_2d" demo project. Open "3d_in_2d" demo project. Then "main.scn" save as "main_mod.scn" using "Save Scene As" Close saved scene. Open the saved "res://main_mod.scn". You will see the Error in console:No loader found for resource: res://./player_2d.scn::1 It seems strange path saved. "res://./player_2d.scn::1" should be "res://player_2d.scn::1" Note: tscn format works fine. akien-mga added bug topic:editor junior job labels Jul 18, 2016 akien-mga added this to the 2.1 milestone Jul 18, 2016 reduz commented Jul 22, 2016 I'm considering the removal of save path as relative in the editor options, given the editor can now rename and move stuff and fix dependencies even if you don't save relative, anyone against this? :P punto- commented Jul 22, 2016 what about the asset sharing stuff? if you want to distribute a scene via an asset store, it'll be more portable if the paths are relative.. … On 22 July 2016 at 09:51, Juan Linietsky ***@***.***> wrote: I'm considering the removal of save path as relative in the editor options, given the editor can now rename and move stuff and fix dependencies even if you don't save relative, anyone against this? :P — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#5728 (comment)>, or mute the thread