Error Implicit Declaration Of Function
Contents |
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of
Error Implicit Declaration Of Function Is Invalid In C99
this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn error implicit declaration of function 'create_proc_entry' more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question error implicit declaration of function ‘skb_copy datagram iovec’ x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up error:
Error Implicit Declaration Of Function ‘create_proc_read_entry’
implicit declaration of function 'create_proc_read_entry' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] up vote 6 down vote favorite 1 I'm trying to compile a kernel module on kernel 3.13 and I get this error: error: implicit declaration of function 'create_proc_read_entry' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] I google it and did not found any response. Here is the part of the code which refers to this error: #if (LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,24)) proc = proc_net_create(KAODV_QUEUE_PROC_FS_NAME,
Error Implicit Declaration Of Function ‘strnicmp’
0, kaodv_queue_get_info); #else proc = create_proc_read_entry(KAODV_QUEUE_PROC_FS_NAME, 0, init_net.proc_net, kaodv_queue_get_info, NULL); #endif if (!proc) { printk(KERN_ERR "kaodv_queue: failed to create proc entry\n"); return -1; } Can I get help ? I really don't know what is wrong. It might be the kernel 3.13 which needs a patch. I read somewhere (on KERNEL 3.10) that the kernel needs patch. Can anyone show me where can I get the 3.13 kernel patch to eventually fix the problem. Thanks c linux linux-kernel kernel-module share|improve this question asked Sep 9 '14 at 13:53 scof007 751212 1 The error is because you are not including explicitly the header that declares the function and the compiler is 'including' implicitily for you and this throws a warning. The flag '-Werror' is making the compiler treats the warning as an error. Try adding: #include
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site error implicit declaration of function ‘smp_mb_ before clear_bit’ About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about
Error Implicit Declaration Of Function In C
hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss error implicit declaration of function ‘generic_file_aio_read’ Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Error: “Implicit declaration http://stackoverflow.com/questions/25746461/error-implicit-declaration-of-function-create-proc-read-entry-werror-implic of function…” on all my functions up vote 1 down vote favorite Here's the code main() { short sMax = SHRT_MAX; int iMax = INT_MAX; long lMax = LONG_MAX; // Printing min and max values for types short, int and long using constants printf("range of short int: %i ... %i\n", SHRT_MIN, SHRT_MAX); printf("range of int: %d ... %d\n", INT_MIN, INT_MAX); printf("range of long int: %ld http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15245284/error-implicit-declaration-of-function-on-all-my-functions ... %ld\n", LONG_MIN, LONG_MAX); // Computing and printing the same values using knowledge of binary numbers // Short int computed_sMax = computeShort() / 2; printf("\n Computed max and min short values: \n %i ... ", computed_sMax); int computed_sMin = (computeShort()/2 + 1) * -1; printf("%i\n", computed_sMin); //Int int computed_iMax = computeInt() / 2; printf("\n Computed min and max int values: \n %i ... ", computed_iMax); int computed_iMin = computeInt() / 2; printf("%i", computed_iMin); return 0; } int computeShort() { int myShort = 0; int min = 0; int max = 16; for (int i = min; i < max; i++) { myShort = myShort + pow(2, i); } return myShort; } int computeInt() { int myInt = 0; int min = 0; int max = 32; for (int i = min; i < max; i++) { myInt = myInt + pow(2, i); } return myInt; } c share|improve this question edited Mar 6 '13 at 11:14 Kaunteya 7851234 asked Mar 6 '13 at 10:50 papercuts 4451613 add a comment| 2 Answers 2 active oldest votes up vote 3 down vote accepted You have to declare the functions before you use them: int comput
is named as func_name in file /source/folderA/ fileA.c. The actual function definition is in /source/folderB/fileB.c. And I get this error. warning: implicit declaration of function `func_name' ***Error Code 1 I http://www.thecodingforums.com/threads/error-implicit-declaration-of-function-func_name.620851/ know that I have to include the file in fileA.c but the library in which I am working on is clean, i.e. there are no cross includes like that. Any other option to do that. DanielJohnson, Jun 17, 2008 #1 Advertisements santosh Guest DanielJohnson wrote: > I call a function which is named as func_name in file /source/folderA/ > fileA.c. > > The actual function definition is error implicit in /source/folderB/fileB.c. > > And I get this error. > > warning: implicit declaration of function `func_name' > ***Error Code 1 > > I know that I have to include the file in fileA.c but the library in > which I am working on is clean, i.e. there are no cross includes like > that. > > Any other option to do that. Yes. Include the correct prototype error implicit declaration for func_name in a header and include that header in fileA.c santosh, Jun 17, 2008 #2 Advertisements Richard Tobin Guest In article <>, DanielJohnson <> wrote: >I know that I have to include the file in fileA.c but the library in >which I am working on is clean, i.e. there are no cross includes like >that. Why do you think it is "unclean" to include the necessary header? If your program has a structure you consider unclean, then restructure the program. Don't try to hide the dirtiness by not including the necessary headers. -- Richard -- In the selection of the two characters immediately succeeding the numeral 9, consideration shall be given to their replacement by the graphics 10 and 11 to facilitate the adoption of the code in the sterling monetary area. (X3.4-1963) Richard Tobin, Jun 17, 2008 #3 rahul Guest On Jun 18, 2:37 am, DanielJohnson <> wrote: > I call a function which is named as func_name in file /source/folderA/ > fileA.c. > > The actual function definition is in /source/folderB/fileB.c. > > And I get this error. > > warning: implicit declaration of function `func_name' > ***Error Code 1 > If your function is "int foo(int a)"