Error Log .net
articles. Whether you are looking for a .NET logging tool or just want to learn more about the topic in general, this website should help you getting started. Please see below for list of popular logging tools and libraries, recommended articles and links. Also make sure to take a look at the .NET Logging Comparison and Concepts & Features pages with explanations of the basic features of logging tools and libraries. Table of Contents What's logging and tracing? .NET logging and tracing tools Articles and recommended links Found this website useful? Bookmark or forward it: What's logging and tracing? Logging (sometimes also called tracing) is used to record information about a program's execution for debugging and testing purposes. Developers, testers and support engineers often use logging and tracing techniques to identify software problems, for post-deployment debugging, monitoring live systems and auditing purposes. Logging usually involves writing text messages to log files or sending data to monitoring applications. Advanced and modern logging tools also support logging of complex data structures, call stacks, threading behavior and also support real-time monitoring of applications over a network or on a local machine. .NET logging and tracing tools C# Logger C# Logger is a logging tool that supports sending events and messages to the Windows event log. The API is similar to Apache's log4j. CommonData The common data project provides functions principally for ASP.NET projects and includes a logging module and an utility for creating custom event logs. CSharp Dot Net Logger C# .NET Logger is an extensible logging framework written in C# and comes with message queuing and asynchronous logging capabilities. DebugWriter DebugWriter is a simple class to help dump property values to the system console in order to inspect them. Enterprise Library Microsoft's Enterprise Library comes with a .NET logging application block to write messages to the Windows event log, text files, message queue and more. log4net Log4net is a tool to help programmers output log statements to different types of output targets. Log4
resources Windows Server 2012 resources Programs MSDN subscriptions Overview Benefits Administrators Students Microsoft Imagine Microsoft Student Partners ISV Startups TechRewards Events Community Magazine Forums Blogs Channel 9 Documentation APIs and reference Dev centers Retired content Samples We’re sorry. The content you requested has been removed. You’ll be auto redirected in 1 second. Developing Applications with Visual Basic Going Further with Visual Basic Logging and Tracing in the .NET Framework with Visual Basic Logging and Tracing in the .NET Framework with Visual Basic Basics of http://www.dotnetlogging.com/ .NET Framework Logs (Visual Basic) Basics of .NET Framework Logs (Visual Basic) Basics of .NET Framework Logs (Visual Basic) Basics of .NET Framework Logs (Visual Basic) Classes Used in .NET Framework Logging (Visual Basic) TOC Collapse the table of content Expand the table of content This documentation is archived and is not being maintained. This documentation is archived https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms172753(v=vs.100).aspx and is not being maintained. Basics of .NET Framework Logs (Visual Basic) Visual Studio 2010 Other Versions Visual Studio 2008 Visual Studio 2005 There are many ways to log information from your Visual Basic applications, in addition to using the Visual Basic My.Application.Log and My.Log objects; many different .NET Framework classes are available. By logging information, you can monitor and measure your application's performance and diagnose errors. Tracing, Debugging, and InstrumentingThe .NET Framework documentation uses several different terms that are related to logging: tracing, debugging, and instrumenting.Tracing is a way for you to monitor the execution of your application while it is running. It is typically implemented using the Trace class. You can add tracing statements to your application when you develop it, and you can use that instrumentation both while you are developing the application and after you have deployed it. Debugging is similar to tracing, but it is typically more verbose and it is turned off in release builds. It is typically implemented using the Trace class.Instrumenting refers to
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/57064/best-practices-for-logging-and-tracing-in-net company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Programmers Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ Programmers Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional programmers interested in conceptual questions about software development. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the error log top Best practices for logging and tracing in .NET up vote 38 down vote favorite 21 I've been reading a lot about tracing and logging, trying to find some golden rule for best practices in the matter, but there isn't any. People say that good programmers produce good tracing, but put it that way and it has to come from experience. I've also read similar questions in here and through the internet error log .net and they are not really the same thing I am asking or do not have a satisfying answer, maybe because the questions lack some detail. So, folks say that tracing should sort of replicate the experience of debugging the application in cases where you can't attach a debugger. It should provide enough context so that you can see which path is taken at each control point in the application. Going deeper, you can even distinguish between tracing and event logging, in that "event logging is different from tracing in that it captures major states rather than detailed flow of control". Now, say I want to do my tracing and logging using only the standard .NET classes, those in the System.Diagnostics namespace. I figured that the TraceSource class is better for the job than the static Trace class, because I want to differentiate among the trace levels and using the TraceSource class I can pass in a parameter informing the event type, while using the Trace class I must use Trace.WriteLineIf and then verify things like SourceSwitch.TraceInformation and SourceSwitch.TraceErrors, and it doesn't even have properties like TraceVerbose or TraceStart. With all that in mind, would you consider a good practice to do as follows: Trace a "Start" event when begining a method, which should repre