Error Analysis Propagation Uncertainties
Contents |
or more quantities, each with their individual uncertainties, and then combine the information from these quantities in order to come up with a final result of our experiment. How can you state your answer for the combined result uncertainty error propagation calculator of these measurements and their uncertainties scientifically? The answer to this fairly common question
Uncertainty Standard Error
depends on how the individual measurements are combined in the result. We will treat each case separately: Addition of measured quantities percent error uncertainty If you have measured values for the quantities X, Y, and Z, with uncertainties dX, dY, and dZ, and your final result, R, is the sum or difference of these quantities, then the uncertainty error propagation addition dR is: Here the upper equation is an approximation that can also serve as an upper bound for the error. Please note that the rule is the same for addition and subtraction of quantities. Example: Suppose we have measured the starting position as x1 = 9.3+-0.2 m and the finishing position as x2 = 14.4+-0.3 m. Then the displacement is: Dx = x2-x1 = 14.4 m - 9.3
Error Propagation Volume
m = 5.1 m and the error in the displacement is: (0.22 + 0.32)1/2 m = 0.36 m Multiplication of measured quantities In the same way as for sums and differences, we can also state the result for the case of multiplication and division: Again the upper line is an approximation and the lower line is the exact result for independent random uncertainties in the individual variables. And again please note that for the purpose of error calculation there is no difference between multiplication and division. Example: We have measured a displacement of x = 5.1+-0.4 m during a time of t = 0.4+-0.1 s. What is the average velocity and the error in the average velocity? v = x / t = 5.1 m / 0.4 s = 12.75 m/s and the uncertainty in the velocity is: dv = |v| [ (dx/x)2 + (dt/t)2 ]1/2 = 12.75 m/s [(0.4/5.1)2 + (0.1/0.4)2]1/2 = 3.34 m/s Multiplication with a constant What if you have measured the uncertainty in an observable X, and you need to multiply it with a constant that is known exactly? What is the error then? This is easy: just multiply the error in X with the absolute value of the
uncertainty of an answer obtained from a calculation. Every time data are measured, there is an uncertainty associated with that measurement. (Refer to guide to Measurement and Uncertainty.) If these measurements used in your calculation have some uncertainty associated with them, then the final answer uncertainty subtraction will, of course, have some level of uncertainty. For instance, in lab you might measure uncertainty standard deviation an object's position at different times in order to find the object's average velocity. Since both distance and time measurements have uncertainties associated with
Error Propagation Example
them, those uncertainties follow the numbers throughout the calculations and eventually affect your final answer for the velocity of that object. How would you determine the uncertainty in your calculated values? In lab, graphs are often used where LoggerPro http://lectureonline.cl.msu.edu/~mmp/labs/error/e2.htm software calculates uncertainties in slope and intercept values for you. In other classes, like chemistry, there are particular ways to calculate uncertainties. In fact, since uncertainty calculations are based on statistics, there are as many different ways to determine uncertainties as there are statistical methods. The error propagation methods presented in this guide are a set of general rules that will be consistently used for all levels of physics classes in this department. In the following examples: q is http://physics.appstate.edu/undergraduate-programs/laboratory/resources/error-propagation the result of a mathematical operation δ is the uncertainty associated with a measurement. For example, if you have a measurement that looks like this: m = 20.4 kg ±0.2 kg Thenq = 20.4 kg and δm = 0.2 kg First Step: Make sure that your units are consistent Make sure that you are using SI units and that they are consistent. If you are converting between unit systems, then you are probably multiplying your value by a constant. Please see the following rule on how to use constants. Logger Pro If you are using a curve fit generated by Logger Pro, please use the uncertainty associated with the parameters that Logger Pro give you. In the above linear fit, m = 0.9000 andδm = 0.05774. The uncertainty should be rounded to 0.06, which means that the slope must be rounded to the hundredths place as well: m = 0.90± 0.06 If the above values have units, don't forget to include them. Constants If an expression contains a constant, B, such that q =Bx, then: You can see the the constant B only enters the equation in that it is used to determine q. Example: F = mg = (20.4 kg)(-9.80 m/s2) = -199.92 kgm/s2 δF/F = δm/m δF/(-199.92 kgm/s2) = (0.2 kg)/(20.4 kg) δF = ±1.96 kgm/s2 δF = ±2 kgm/s2 F = -199.92 kgm/s2 ±1.96kgm/s2 With the answer rounded to 3 sig figs
The approach to uncertainty analysis that has been followed up to this point in the discussion has been what is called a top-down approach. Uncertainty components http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/mpc/section5/mpc55.htm are estimated from direct repetitions of the measurement result. To https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0OYaG6a51w contrast this with a propagation of error approach, consider the simple example where we estimate the area of a rectangle from replicate measurements of length and width. The area $$ area = length \cdot width $$ can be computed from each replicate. error propagation The standard deviation of the reported area is estimated directly from the replicates of area. Advantages of top-down approach This approach has the following advantages: proper treatment of covariances between measurements of length and width proper treatment of unsuspected sources of error that would emerge if measurements covered a range of operating conditions error analysis propagation and a sufficiently long time period independence from propagation of error model Propagation of error approach combines estimates from individual auxiliary measurements The formal propagation of error approach is to compute: standard deviation from the length measurements standard deviation from the width measurements and combine the two into a standard deviation for area using the approximation for products of two variables (ignoring a possible covariance between length and width), $$ s_{area} = \sqrt{width^2 \cdot s_{length}^2 + length^2 \cdot s_{width}^2} $$ Exact formula Goodman (1960) derived an exact formula for the variance between two products. Given two random variables, \(x\) and \(y\) (correspond to width and length in the above approximate formula), the exact formula for the variance is: $$ V(\bar{x} \bar{y}) = \frac{1}{n} \left[ X^2 V(y) + Y^2 V(x) + 2XYE_{11} + 2X\frac{E_{12}}{n} + 2Y\frac{E_{21}}{n} + \frac{V(x) V(y)}{n} + \frac{Cov((\Delta x)^2, (\Delta y)^2) -E_{11}^2 }{n^2} \right] $$ with \(X = E(x)\) and \(Y = E(y)\) (corresponds t
Du siehst YouTube auf Deutsch. Du kannst diese Einstellung unten ändern. Learn more You're viewing YouTube in German. You can change this preference below. Schließen Ja, ich möchte sie behalten Rückgängig machen Schließen Dieses Video ist nicht verfügbar. WiedergabelisteWarteschlangeWiedergabelisteWarteschlange Alle entfernenBeenden Wird geladen... Wiedergabeliste Warteschlange __count__/__total__ Calculating the Propagation of Uncertainty Scott Lawson AbonnierenAbonniertAbo beenden3.6913 Tsd. Wird geladen... Wird geladen... Wird verarbeitet... Hinzufügen Möchtest du dieses Video später noch einmal ansehen? Wenn du bei YouTube angemeldet bist, kannst du dieses Video zu einer Playlist hinzufügen. Anmelden Teilen Mehr Melden Möchtest du dieses Video melden? Melde dich an, um unangemessene Inhalte zu melden. Anmelden Transkript Statistik 47.342 Aufrufe 177 Dieses Video gefällt dir? Melde dich bei YouTube an, damit dein Feedback gezählt wird. Anmelden 178 11 Dieses Video gefällt dir nicht? Melde dich bei YouTube an, damit dein Feedback gezählt wird. Anmelden 12 Wird geladen... Wird geladen... Transkript Das interaktive Transkript konnte nicht geladen werden. Wird geladen... Wird geladen... Die Bewertungsfunktion ist nach Ausleihen des Videos verfügbar. Diese Funktion ist zurzeit nicht verfügbar. Bitte versuche es später erneut. Hochgeladen am 13.01.2012How to calculate the uncertainty of a value that is a result of taking in multiple other variables, for instance, D=V*T. 'D' is the result of V*T. Since the variables used to calculate this, V and T, could have different uncertainties in measurements, we use partial derivatives to give us a good number for the final absolute uncertainty. In this video I use the example of resistivity, which is a function of resistance, length and cross sectional area. Kategorie Bildung Lizenz Standard-YouTube-Lizenz Mehr anzeigen Weniger anzeigen Wird geladen... Anzeige Autoplay Wenn Autoplay aktiviert ist, wird die Wiedergabe a