Error Analysis Summation
Contents |
just how much the measured value is likely to deviate from the unknown, true, value of the quantity. The art of estimating these deviations
Propagation Of Error Division
should probably be called uncertainty analysis, but for historical reasons is referred to propagation of error physics as error analysis. This document contains brief discussions about how errors are reported, the kinds of errors that can occur,
Error Propagation Square Root
how to estimate random errors, and how to carry error estimates into calculated results. We are not, and will not be, concerned with the “percent error” exercises common in high school, where the error propagation calculator student is content with calculating the deviation from some allegedly authoritative number. Significant figures Whenever you make a measurement, the number of meaningful digits that you write down implies the error in the measurement. For example if you say that the length of an object is 0.428 m, you imply an uncertainty of about 0.001 m. To record this measurement as either 0.4 or 0.42819667 would error propagation chemistry imply that you only know it to 0.1 m in the first case or to 0.00000001 m in the second. You should only report as many significant figures as are consistent with the estimated error. The quantity 0.428 m is said to have three significant figures, that is, three digits that make sense in terms of the measurement. Notice that this has nothing to do with the "number of decimal places". The same measurement in centimeters would be 42.8 cm and still be a three significant figure number. The accepted convention is that only one uncertain digit is to be reported for a measurement. In the example if the estimated error is 0.02 m you would report a result of 0.43 ± 0.02 m, not 0.428 ± 0.02 m. Students frequently are confused about when to count a zero as a significant figure. The rule is: If the zero has a non-zero digit anywhere to its left, then the zero is significant, otherwise it is not. For example 5.00 has 3 significant figures; the number 0.0005 has only one significant figure, and 1.0005 has 5 significant figures. A number like 300 is not well defined. Rathe
it. In doing this it is crucial to understand that all measurements of physical quantities are subject to uncertainties. It is never possible to measure anything exactly. It is good, of course, to make the error as small as possible but it is always there.
Error Propagation Average
And in order to draw valid conclusions the error must be indicated and dealt with properly. error propagation inverse Take the measurement of a person's height as an example. Assuming that her height has been determined to be 5' 8", how accurate is our
How To Calculate Fractional Error
result? Well, the height of a person depends on how straight she stands, whether she just got up (most people are slightly taller when getting up from a long rest in horizontal position), whether she has her shoes on, and http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/~labgroup/pdf/Error_analysis.htm how long her hair is and how it is made up. These inaccuracies could all be called errors of definition. A quantity such as height is not exactly defined without specifying many other circumstances. Even if you could precisely specify the "circumstances," your result would still have an error associated with it. The scale you are using is of limited accuracy; when you read the scale, you may have to estimate a fraction between the marks on the scale, etc. If the http://teacher.nsrl.rochester.edu/phy_labs/AppendixB/AppendixB.html result of a measurement is to have meaning it cannot consist of the measured value alone. An indication of how accurate the result is must be included also. Indeed, typically more effort is required to determine the error or uncertainty in a measurement than to perform the measurement itself. Thus, the result of any physical measurement has two essential components: (1) A numerical value (in a specified system of units) giving the best estimate possible of the quantity measured, and (2) the degree of uncertainty associated with this estimated value. For example, a measurement of the width of a table would yield a result such as 95.3 +/- 0.1 cm. Significant Figures The significant figures of a (measured or calculated) quantity are the meaningful digits in it. There are conventions which you should learn and follow for how to express numbers so as to properly indicate their significant figures. Any digit that is not zero is significant. Thus 549 has three significant figures and 1.892 has four significant figures. Zeros between non zero digits are significant. Thus 4023 has four significant figures. Zeros to the left of the first non zero digit are not significant. Thus 0.000034 has only two significant figures. This is more easily seen if it is written as 3.4x10-5. For numbers with decimal points, zeros to the right of a non zero digit are significant. Thus 2.00 has three significant figures and 0.050 has two significant figures. For this rea
Request full-text Error analysis of a pairwise summation algorithm to compute the sample varianceArticle in Numerische Mathematik 58(1):583-590 · December 1990 with 28 ReadsDOI: 10.1007/BF01385641 1st Jesse L. Barlow28.47 · Pennsylvania State UniversityAbstractSummary We https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242943921_Error_analysis_of_a_pairwise_summation_algorithm_to_compute_the_sample_variance give an error analysis of an algorithm for computing the sample variance due to Chan, Golub, and LeVeque [The American Statistician 7 (1983), pp. 242–247]. It is shown that this algorithm is numerically stable. The algorithm computes the sample variance (and the sample mean) using just one pass through the sample data. It is amenable to pairwise summation and thus requires onlyO(logn) error propagation parallel steps.Do you want to read the rest of this article?Request full-text CitationsCitations4ReferencesReferences6Large Sparse Stable Matrix Computations"[2] "[Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: The project proposal discussed two problem areas: (1) The solution of large sparse of linear equations; and (2) The solution of sparse least squares problems. We report significant progress in both of these areas and in a third area, the propagation of error solution of the algebraic eigenvalue problem. The progress in solving systems of linear equations included an algorithm for computing ordering for efficiently factoring sparse symmetric, positive definite systems in parallel. We also made important progress in computing the ordering itself in parallel. Other progress included a method for handling singular blocks in a one-way dissection ordering and an error analysis of Gaussian elimination in unnormalized arithmetic. For linear least squares problems we developed an efficient reliable method for detecting the rank of a sparse matrix without column exhanges. The method used a static data structure. We also analyzed and compared methods for computing sparse and dense QR factorizations on message passing architectures. On the algebraic eigenvalue problem, we participated in resolving long standing open questions on relative perturbation bounds on certain diagonally dominant eigenvalue problems. (KR) Full-text · Article · Oct 1990 · Handbook of StatisticsAlex PothenJesse L. BarlowRead full-textBibliography of Accuracy and Stability of Numerical Algorithms, SIAM, 2002Article · Jan 1966 · Handbook of StatisticsNicholas J HighamRead9 Numerical aspects of solving linear least squares problemsArticle · Dec 1993 Jesse L. BarlowReadShow morePeople who