Error Propagation Cross Product
Contents |
propagation of error) is the effect of variables' uncertainties (or errors, more specifically random errors) on the uncertainty of a function based on them. When the variables are the values of experimental measurements they have uncertainties due to measurement limitations (e.g., instrument precision) which propagate to the combination of variables in the error propagation example function. The uncertainty u can be expressed in a number of ways. It may be defined
Error Propagation Division
by the absolute error Δx. Uncertainties can also be defined by the relative error (Δx)/x, which is usually written as a percentage. Most commonly, the
Error Propagation Physics
uncertainty on a quantity is quantified in terms of the standard deviation, σ, the positive square root of variance, σ2. The value of a quantity and its error are then expressed as an interval x ± u. If the statistical probability
Error Propagation Calculus
distribution of the variable is known or can be assumed, it is possible to derive confidence limits to describe the region within which the true value of the variable may be found. For example, the 68% confidence limits for a one-dimensional variable belonging to a normal distribution are ± one standard deviation from the value, that is, there is approximately a 68% probability that the true value lies in the region x ± σ. If the uncertainties are correlated then covariance must be error propagation khan academy taken into account. Correlation can arise from two different sources. First, the measurement errors may be correlated. Second, when the underlying values are correlated across a population, the uncertainties in the group averages will be correlated.[1] Contents 1 Linear combinations 2 Non-linear combinations 2.1 Simplification 2.2 Example 2.3 Caveats and warnings 2.3.1 Reciprocal 2.3.2 Shifted reciprocal 3 Example formulas 4 Example calculations 4.1 Inverse tangent function 4.2 Resistance measurement 5 See also 6 References 7 Further reading 8 External links Linear combinations[edit] Let { f k ( x 1 , x 2 , … , x n ) } {\displaystyle \ ρ 5(x_ ρ 4,x_ ρ 3,\dots ,x_ ρ 2)\}} be a set of m functions which are linear combinations of n {\displaystyle n} variables x 1 , x 2 , … , x n {\displaystyle x_ σ 7,x_ σ 6,\dots ,x_ σ 5} with combination coefficients A k 1 , A k 2 , … , A k n , ( k = 1 … m ) {\displaystyle A_ σ 1,A_ σ 0,\dots ,A_ ρ 9,(k=1\dots m)} . f k = ∑ i n A k i x i or f = A x {\displaystyle f_ ρ 5=\sum _ ρ 4^ ρ 3A_ ρ 2x_ ρ 1{\text{ or }}\mathrm ρ 0 =\mathrm σ 9 \,} and let the variance-covariance matrix on x be denoted by Σ x {\displaystyle \mathrm {\Sigma ^ σ 1} \,} . Σ x = ( σ 1 2 σ 12 σ
then the numbers resulting from the calculations are also imprecise. The precision (expressed as the "standard error") of the result from evaluating any function f(x) depends on the precision of x, and error propagation average on the derivative of the function with respect to x. When two error propagation chemistry or more variables appear together in a function f(x,y), the precision of the result depends on: the standard errors error propagation log of x and y, the partial derivatives of the function with respect to x and y, and the correlation (if any) between the fluctuations in x and y (expressed as the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propagation_of_uncertainty "error-correlation"). Correlated fluctuations most commonly arise when the two variables are parameters resulting from a curve-fit. A good curve-fitting program should produce the error-correlation between the parameters as well as the standard error of each parameter. (Check out my non-linear least squares curve fitting page.) If you're interested in how this page does what it does, read the Techie-Stuff section, at the bottom http://statpages.info/erpropgt.html of this page. This sections below perform all the required calculations for a function of one or two variables. Just enter the numbers and their standard errors (and error-correlation, if known), and click the Propagate button. For a single variable: z=f(x) 1. Enter the measured value of the variable (x) and its standard error of estimate: x = +/- 2. Enter the expression involving x: For example: 1/(10-x) z = 3. Click on this button: The value of the resulting expression, z, and its standard error: z = +/- For two variables: z=f(x,y) 1. Enter the measured value of the first variable (x) and its standard error of estimate: x = +/- 2. Enter the measured value of the second variable (y) and its standard error of estimate: y = +/- 3. Enter the "error-correlation" between the two variables (if known, otherwise use 0): r = 4. Enter the expression involving x and y: For example: x + 3*y - x*y/10 z = 5. Click on this button: The value of the resulting expression, z, and its standard error: z = +/- Syntax Rules for Construct
or more quantities, each with their individual uncertainties, and then combine the information from these quantities in order to come up with a final result of our experiment. How can you state your http://lectureonline.cl.msu.edu/~mmp/labs/error/e2.htm answer for the combined result of these measurements and their uncertainties scientifically? The answer to this fairly common question depends on how the individual measurements are combined in the result. We will treat each case separately: Addition of measured quantities If you have measured values for the quantities X, Y, and Z, with uncertainties dX, dY, and dZ, and your final result, R, error propagation is the sum or difference of these quantities, then the uncertainty dR is: Here the upper equation is an approximation that can also serve as an upper bound for the error. Please note that the rule is the same for addition and subtraction of quantities. Example: Suppose we have measured the starting position as x1 = 9.3+-0.2 m and the finishing position as error propagation cross x2 = 14.4+-0.3 m. Then the displacement is: Dx = x2-x1 = 14.4 m - 9.3 m = 5.1 m and the error in the displacement is: (0.22 + 0.32)1/2 m = 0.36 m Multiplication of measured quantities In the same way as for sums and differences, we can also state the result for the case of multiplication and division: Again the upper line is an approximation and the lower line is the exact result for independent random uncertainties in the individual variables. And again please note that for the purpose of error calculation there is no difference between multiplication and division. Example: We have measured a displacement of x = 5.1+-0.4 m during a time of t = 0.4+-0.1 s. What is the average velocity and the error in the average velocity? v = x / t = 5.1 m / 0.4 s = 12.75 m/s and the uncertainty in the velocity is: dv = |v| [ (dx/x)2 + (dt/t)2 ]1/2 = 12.75 m/s [(0.4/5.1)2 + (0.1/0.4)2]1/2 = 3.34 m/s Multiplication with a constant What if you have measured the uncertainty in an observable X, and you