Error Propagation Units
Contents |
uncertainty of an answer obtained from a calculation. Every time data are measured, there is an uncertainty associated with that measurement. (Refer to guide to Measurement and Uncertainty.) If these measurements used in your calculation have some
Error Propagation Example
uncertainty associated with them, then the final answer will, of course, have some level error propagation division of uncertainty. For instance, in lab you might measure an object's position at different times in order to find the object's error propagation physics average velocity. Since both distance and time measurements have uncertainties associated with them, those uncertainties follow the numbers throughout the calculations and eventually affect your final answer for the velocity of that object. How would
Error Propagation Calculus
you determine the uncertainty in your calculated values? In lab, graphs are often used where LoggerPro software calculates uncertainties in slope and intercept values for you. In other classes, like chemistry, there are particular ways to calculate uncertainties. In fact, since uncertainty calculations are based on statistics, there are as many different ways to determine uncertainties as there are statistical methods. The error propagation methods presented in this guide are a
Error Propagation Khan Academy
set of general rules that will be consistently used for all levels of physics classes in this department. In the following examples: q is the result of a mathematical operation δ is the uncertainty associated with a measurement. For example, if you have a measurement that looks like this: m = 20.4 kg ±0.2 kg Thenq = 20.4 kg and δm = 0.2 kg First Step: Make sure that your units are consistent Make sure that you are using SI units and that they are consistent. If you are converting between unit systems, then you are probably multiplying your value by a constant. Please see the following rule on how to use constants. Logger Pro If you are using a curve fit generated by Logger Pro, please use the uncertainty associated with the parameters that Logger Pro give you. In the above linear fit, m = 0.9000 andδm = 0.05774. The uncertainty should be rounded to 0.06, which means that the slope must be rounded to the hundredths place as well: m = 0.90± 0.06 If the above values have units, don't forget to include them. Constants If an expression contains a constant, B, such that q =Bx, then: You can see the the constant B only enters the equatio
measurands based on more complicated functions can be done using basic propagation of errors principles. For example, suppose we want to compute the uncertainty of error propagation average the discharge coefficient for fluid flow (Whetstone et al.). The measurement
Error Propagation Chemistry
equation is $$ C_d = \frac{\dot{m} \sqrt{1-\left( \frac{d}{D} \right) ^4}}{K d^2 F \sqrt{\rho} \sqrt{\Delta P}} $$ where error propagation log $$ \begin{eqnarray*} C_d &=& \mbox{discharge coefficient} \\ \dot{m} &=& \mbox{mass flow rate} \\ d &=& \mbox{orifice diameter} \\ D &=& \mbox{pipe diameter} \\ \rho &=& \mbox{fluid density} \\ http://physics.appstate.edu/undergraduate-programs/laboratory/resources/error-propagation \Delta P &=& \mbox{differential pressure} \\ K &=& \mbox{constant} \\ F &=& \mbox{thermal expansion factor (constant)} \\ \end{eqnarray*} $$ Assuming the variables in the equation are uncorrelated, the squared uncertainty of the discharge coefficient is $$ s^2_{Cd} = \left[ \frac{\partial C_d}{\partial \dot{m}} \right]^2 s^2_{\dot m} + \left[ \frac{\partial C_d}{\partial d} \right]^2 s^2_d + \left[ \frac{\partial http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/mpc/section5/mpc553.htm C_d}{\partial D} \right]^2 s^2_D + \left[ \frac{\partial C_d}{\partial \rho} \right]^2 s^2_{\rho} + \left[ \frac{\partial C_d}{\partial \Delta P} \right]^2 s^2_{\Delta P} $$ and the partial derivatives are the following. $$ \frac{\partial C_d}{\partial \dot{m}} = \frac{\sqrt{1-\left( \frac{d}{D} \right) ^4}}{K d^2 F \sqrt{\rho} \sqrt{\Delta P}} $$ $$ \frac{\partial C_d}{\partial d} = \frac{-2\dot{m} d}{K F D^4 \sqrt{\rho} \sqrt{\Delta P} \sqrt{1-\left( \frac{d}{D} \right) ^4}} - \frac{2 \dot{m} \sqrt{1-\left( \frac{d}{D} \right) ^4}}{K d^3 F \sqrt{\rho} \sqrt{\Delta P}} $$ $$ \frac{\partial C_d}{\partial D} = \frac{2 \dot{m} d^2}{K F D^5 \sqrt{\rho} \sqrt{\Delta P} \sqrt{1-\left( \frac{d}{D} \right) ^4}} $$ $$ \frac{\partial C_d}{\partial \rho} = \frac{- \dot{m} \sqrt{1-\left( \frac{d}{D} \right) ^4}}{2 K d^2 F \rho^{\frac{3}{2}} \sqrt{\Delta P}} $$ $$ \frac{\partial C_d}{\partial \Delta P} = \frac{- \dot{m} \sqrt{1-\left( \frac{d}{D} \right) ^4}}{2 K d^2 F \sqrt{\rho} (\Delta P)^{\frac{3}{2}}} $$ Software can simplify propagation of error Propagation of error for more complicated functions can be done reliably with software capable of symbolic computations or algebraic representations. Symbolic computation software can also be used to combine the partial
WorkSocial MediaSoftwareProgrammingWeb Design & DevelopmentBusinessCareersComputers Online Courses B2B Solutions Shop for Books San Francisco, CA Brr, it´s cold outside Search Submit Learn more with dummies Enter your email to join our mailing list for FREE content right to your inbox. Easy! Your email Submit RELATED ARTICLES Simple Error Propagation Formulas for http://www.dummies.com/education/science/biology/simple-error-propagation-formulas-for-simple-expressions/ Simple Expressions Key Concepts in Human Biology and Physiology Chronic Pain and Individual Differences in Pain Perception Pain-Free and Hating It: Peripheral Neuropathy Neurotransmitters That Reduce or Block Pain Load more EducationScienceBiologySimple Error Propagation Formulas for Simple Expressions Simple Error Propagation Formulas for Simple Expressions Related Book Biostatistics For Dummies By John Pezzullo Even though some general error-propagation formulas are very complicated, the rules for propagating SEs through some simple mathematical expressions are much easier error propagation to work with. Here are some of the most common simple rules. All the rules that involve two or more variables assume that those variables have been measured independently; they shouldn't be applied when the two variables have been calculated from the same raw data. Adding or subtracting a constant doesn't change the SE Adding (or subtracting) an exactly known numerical constant (that has no SE at all) doesn't affect the SE of a error propagation units number. So if x = 38 ± 2, then x + 100 = 138 ± 2. Likewise, if x = 38 ± 2, then x - 15 = 23 ± 2. Multiplying (or dividing) by a constant multiplies (or divides) the SE by the same amount Multiplying a number by an exactly known constant multiplies the SE by that same constant. This situation arises when converting units of measure. For example, to convert a length from meters to centimeters, you multiply by exactly 100, so a length of an exercise track that's measured as 150 ± 1 meters can also be expressed as 15,000 ± 100 centimeters. For sums and differences: Add the squares of SEs together When adding or subtracting two independently measured numbers, you square each SE, then add the squares, and then take the square root of the sum, like this: For example, if each of two measurements has an SE of ± 1, and those numbers are added together (or subtracted), the resulting sum (or difference) has an SE of A useful rule to remember is that the SE of the sum or difference of two equally precise numbers is about 40 percent larger than the SE of one of the numbers. When two numbers of different precision are combined (added or subtracted), the precision of the
be down. Please try the request again. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Generated Fri, 14 Oct 2016 15:25:43 GMT by s_ac15 (squid/3.5.20)