Error Propagation With Natural Log
Contents |
a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with
Error Propagation Ln
us Physics Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ Physics Stack Exchange is a question error propagation logarithm and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works:
How To Calculate Uncertainty Of Logarithm
Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top The error of the natural logarithm up vote 10 down vote favorite 2 Can anyone explain why the error for $\ln (x)$ error propagation log base 10 (where for $x$ we have $x\pm\Delta x$) is simply said to be $\frac{\Delta x}{x}$? I would very much appreciate a somewhat rigorous rationalization of this step. Additionally, is this the case for other logarithms (e.g. $\log_2(x)$), or how would that be done? error-analysis share|cite|improve this question edited Jan 25 '14 at 20:01 Chris Mueller 4,72711444 asked Jan 25 '14 at 18:31 Just_a_fool 3341413 add a comment| 2 Answers 2 active oldest votes up vote 17 down vote accepted Simple error analysis assumes uncertainty logarithm base 10 that the error of a function $\Delta f(x)$ by a given error $\Delta x$ of the input argument is approximately $$ \Delta f(x) \approx \frac{\text{d}f(x)}{\text{d}x}\cdot\Delta x $$ The mathematical reasoning behind this is the Taylor series and the character of $\frac{\text{d}f(x)}{\text{d}x}$ describing how the function $f(x)$ changes when its input argument changes a little bit. In fact this assumption makes only sense if $\Delta x \ll x$ (see Emilio Pisanty's answer for details on this) and if your function isnt too nonlinear at the specific point (in which case the presentation of a result in the form $f(x) \pm \Delta f(x)$ wouldnt make sense anyway). Note that sometimes $\left| \frac{\text{d}f(x)}{\text{d}x}\right|$ is used to avoid getting negative erros. Since $$ \frac{\text{d}\ln(x)}{\text{d}x} = \frac{1}{x} $$ the error would be $$ \Delta \ln(x) \approx \frac{\Delta x}{x} $$ For arbitraty logarithms we can use the change of the logarithm base: $$ \log_b x = \frac{\ln x}{\ln b}\\ (\ln x = \log_\text{e} x) $$ to obtain $$ \Delta \log_b x \approx \frac{\Delta x}{x \cdot \ln b} $$ share|cite|improve this answer edited Jan 26 '14 at 7:54 answered Jan 25 '14 at 18:39 LeFitz 48949 1 This (nice) answer is correct for the case that $\Delta x\ll x$ but will otherwise fail; see my answer below for why and what to do there. –Emilio Pisanty Jan 25 '14 at 21:29 very right, thx for pointing out, ill add a short note to point out your det
the quantity. Uncertainty in logarithms to other bases (such as common http://phys114115lab.capuphysics.ca/App%20A%20-%20uncertainties/appA%20propLogs.htm logs logarithms to base 10, written as log10 or simply log) is this absolute uncertainty adjusted by a factor (divided by 2.3 for common logs). Note, logarithms do not have units.
\[ ln(x \pm \Delta x)=ln(x)\pm \frac{\Delta x}{x}\] \[~~~~~~~~~ln((95 \pm 5)mm)=ln(95~mm)\pm \frac{ 5~mm}{95~mm}\] \[~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=4.543 \pm 0.053\]Engineering Medicine Agriculture Photosciences Humanities Periodic Table of the Elements Reference Tables Physical Constants Units and Conversions Organic http://chem.libretexts.org/Core/Analytical_Chemistry/Quantifying_Nature/Significant_Digits/Propagation_of_Error Chemistry Glossary Search site Search Search Go back to previous article Username Password Sign in Sign in Sign in Registration Forgot password Expand/collapse global hierarchy Home Core Analytical Chemistry Quantifying Nature Expand/collapse global location Propagation of Error Last updated 20:33, 14 May 2016 Save as PDF Share Share Share Tweet Share IntroductionDerivation error propagation of Exact FormulaDerivation of Arithmetic ExampleCaveats and WarningsDisadvantages of Propagation of Error ApproachTreatment of Covariance TermsReferencesContributors Propagation of Error (or Propagation of Uncertainty) is defined as the effects on a function by a variable's uncertainty. It is a calculus derived statistical calculation designed to combine uncertainties from multiple variables, in order to provide error propagation log an accurate measurement of uncertainty. Introduction Every measurement has an air of uncertainty about it, and not all uncertainties are equal. Therefore, the ability to properly combine uncertainties from different measurements is crucial. Uncertainty in measurement comes about in a variety of ways: instrument variability, different observers, sample differences, time of day, etc. Typically, error is given by the standard deviation (\(\sigma_x\)) of a measurement. Anytime a calculation requires more than one variable to solve, propagation of error is necessary to properly determine the uncertainty. For example, lets say we are using a UV-Vis Spectrophotometer to determine the molar absorptivity of a molecule via Beer's Law: A = ε l c. Since at least two of the variables have an uncertainty based on the equipment used, a propagation of error formula must be applied to measure a more exact uncertainty of the molar absorptivity. This example will be continued below, after the derivation (see Example Calculat
be down. Please try the request again. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Generated Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:24:58 GMT by s_wx1094 (squid/3.5.20)