Log Of Error
Contents |
a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about error propagation logarithm Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads
Logarithmic Error Bars
with us Physics Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for logarithmic error calculation active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up
Error Propagation Log Base 10
and rise to the top The error of the natural logarithm up vote 10 down vote favorite 2 Can anyone explain why the error for $\ln (x)$ (where for $x$ we have $x\pm\Delta x$) is simply said to be $\frac{\Delta x}{x}$? I would very much appreciate a somewhat rigorous rationalization of this step. Additionally, is this the case for other logarithms (e.g. $\log_2(x)$), or how would that be log uncertainty done? error-analysis share|cite|improve this question edited Jan 25 '14 at 20:01 Chris Mueller 4,72811444 asked Jan 25 '14 at 18:31 Just_a_fool 3341413 add a comment| 2 Answers 2 active oldest votes up vote 17 down vote accepted Simple error analysis assumes that the error of a function $\Delta f(x)$ by a given error $\Delta x$ of the input argument is approximately $$ \Delta f(x) \approx \frac{\text{d}f(x)}{\text{d}x}\cdot\Delta x $$ The mathematical reasoning behind this is the Taylor series and the character of $\frac{\text{d}f(x)}{\text{d}x}$ describing how the function $f(x)$ changes when its input argument changes a little bit. In fact this assumption makes only sense if $\Delta x \ll x$ (see Emilio Pisanty's answer for details on this) and if your function isnt too nonlinear at the specific point (in which case the presentation of a result in the form $f(x) \pm \Delta f(x)$ wouldnt make sense anyway). Note that sometimes $\left| \frac{\text{d}f(x)}{\text{d}x}\right|$ is used to avoid getting negative erros. Since $$ \frac{\text{d}\ln(x)}{\text{d}x} = \frac{1}{x} $$ the error would be $$ \Delta \ln(x) \approx \frac{\Delta x}{x} $$ For arbitraty logarithms we can use the change of the logarithm base: $$ \log_b x = \frac{\ln x}{\ln b}\\ (\ln x = \log_\text{e} x) $$ to obtain
Log All Known Implementing Classes: AvalonLogger, Jdk13LumberjackLogger,
How To Find Log Error In Physics
Jdk14Logger, Log4JLogger, LogKitLogger, NoOpLog, SimpleLog public interface Log
Uncertainty Logarithm Base 10
A simple logging interface abstracting logging APIs. In order to be instantiated error propagation ln successfully by LogFactory, classes that implement this interface must have a constructor that takes a single String parameter representing http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/95254/the-error-of-the-natural-logarithm the "name" of this Log. The six logging levels used by Log are (in order): trace (the least serious) debug info warn error fatal (the most serious) The mapping of these log levels to the concepts used by the underlying https://commons.apache.org/logging/apidocs/org/apache/commons/logging/Log.html logging system is implementation dependent. The implementation should ensure, though, that this ordering behaves as expected. Performance is often a logging concern. By examining the appropriate property, a component can avoid expensive operations (producing information to be logged). For example, if (log.isDebugEnabled()) { ... do something expensive ... log.debug(theResult); } Configuration of the underlying logging system will generally be done external to the Logging APIs, through whatever mechanism is supported by that system. Version: $Id: Log.java 1606045 2014-06-27 12:11:56Z tn $ Method Summary Methods Modifier and Type Method and Description void debug(Objectmessage) Logs a message with debug log level. void debug(Objectmessage, https://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/scenario/errorman/calculus.htm dispense with the tedious explanations and elaborations of previous chapters. 6.2 THE CHAIN RULE AND DETERMINATE ERRORS If a result R = R(x,y,z) is calculated from a number of data quantities, x, y and z, then the relation: [6-1] ∂R ∂R ∂R dR = —— dx + —— dy + —— dz ∂x ∂y ∂z
holds. This is one of the "chain rules" of calculus. This error propagation equation has as many terms as there are variables. Then, if the fractional errors are small, the differentials dR, dx, dy and dz may be replaced by the absolute errors ΔR, Δx, Δy, and Δz, and written: [6-2] ∂R ∂R ∂R ΔR ≈ —— Δx + —— Δy + —— Δz ∂x ∂y ∂z Strictly this is no longer an equality, but an approximation to DR, since error propagation log the higher order terms in the Taylor expansion have been neglected. So long as the errors are of the order of a few percent or less, this will not matter. This equation is now an error propagation equation. [6-3] Finally, divide equation (6.2) by R: ΔR x ∂R Δx y ∂R Δy z ∂R Δz —— = —————+——— ——+————— R R ∂x x R ∂y y R ∂z z The factors of the form Δx/x, Δy/y, etc are relative (fractional) errors. This equation shows how the errors in the result depend on the errors in the data. Eq. 6.2 and 6.3 are called the standard form error equations. They are also called determinate error equations, because they are strictly valid for determinate errors (not indeterminate errors). [We'll get to indeterminate errors soon.] The coefficients in Eq. 6.3 of the fractional errors are of the form [(x/R)(∂R/dx)]. These play the very important role of "weighting" factors in the various error terms. At this point numeric values of the relative errors could be substituted into this equation, along with the other measured quantities, x, y, z, to calculate ΔR. Notice the character of the standard form error equation. It has one te