Error 2 Is Inaccessible Due To Its Protection Level
Contents |
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business is inaccessible due to its protection level c# Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation is inaccessible due to its protection level unity Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like
System.data.datarow.datarow(system.data.datarowbuilder)' Is Inaccessible Due To Its Protection Level
you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Public class is inaccessible due to its protection level up vote 23 down vote favorite 4 I have the following classes: namespace Bla.Bla {
It May Be Inaccessible Due To Its Protection Level
public abstract class ClassA { public virtual void Setup(string thing) { } public abstract bool IsThingValid(); public abstract void ReadThings(); public virtual void MatchThings() { } public virtual void SaveThings() { } public void Run(string thing) { Setup(thing); if (!IsThingValid()) { } ReadThings(); MatchThings(); SaveThings(); } } } namespace Bla.Bla { public class ClassB : ClassA { ClassB() { } public override void IsThingValid() { throw new NotImplementedException(); } public override void ReadThings() { throw it may be inaccessible due to its protection level vs 2010 new NotImplementedException(); } } } Now I try to do the following: public class ClassC { public void Main() { var thing = new ClassB(); ClassB.Run("thing"); } } Which returns the following error: ClassB is inaccessible due to its protection level. But they are all public. c# share|improve this question edited Aug 23 '13 at 14:01 asked Aug 23 '13 at 13:36 jao 8,88163371 1 it is c#, @Hans –Elvin Mammadov Aug 23 '13 at 13:39 please, add namespace, and other code –Elvin Mammadov Aug 23 '13 at 13:41 1 @HansPassant, this code compiles –Habib Aug 23 '13 at 13:41 2 Try not using pseudocode and post the real thing as there is nothing in that, that should cause your problem. –Shaun Wilde Aug 23 '13 at 13:41 Updated with real code. And it is C#. –jao Aug 23 '13 at 13:50 add a comment| 3 Answers 3 active oldest votes up vote 40 down vote accepted This error is a result of the protection level of ClassB's constructor, not ClassB itself. Since the name of the constructor is the same as the name of the class* , the error may be interpreted incorrectly. Since you did not specify the protection level of your constructor, it is assumed to be internal by default. Declaring the constructor publi
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company
It May Be Inaccessible Due To Its Protection Level Visual Studio 2012
Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions it may be inaccessible due to its protection level visual studio 2013 Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, configurationmanager is not declared it may be inaccessible due to its protection level just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up is inaccessible due to its protection level up vote 14 down vote favorite help me i cant figure this out. The http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18404264/public-class-is-inaccessible-due-to-its-protection-level problem is that the distance, club, cleanclub, hole , scores , and par all say inaccessible due to protection level and I don't know why because I thought I did everything right. namespace homeworkchap8 { public class Clubs { protected string club; protected string distance; protected string cleanclub; protected string scores; protected string par; protected string hole; public string myclub { get { return club; } set { club = value; } } public http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6125077/is-inaccessible-due-to-its-protection-level string mydistance { get { return distance; } set { distance = value; } } public string mycleanclub { get { return cleanclub; } set { cleanclub = value; } } public string myscore { get { return scores; } set { scores = value; } } public string parhole { get { return par; } set { par = value; } } public string myhole { get { return hole; } set { hole = value; } } } } this is the derived class: namespace homeworkchap8 { public class SteelClubs : Clubs, ISwingClub { public void SwingClub() { Console.WriteLine("You hit a " + myclub + " " + mydistance); } public void clean() { if (mycleanclub != "yes") { Console.WriteLine("your club is dirty"); } else { Console.WriteLine("your club is clean"); } } public void score() { Console.WriteLine("you are on hole " + myhole + " and you scored a " + myscore + " on a par " + parhole); } } } This is the interface: namespace homeworkchap8 { public interface ISwingClub { void SwingClub(); void clean(); void score(); } } here is the main code: namespace homeworkchap8 { class main { static void Main(string[] args) { SteelClubs myClub = new SteelClubs(); Console.WriteLine("How far to the hole?"); myClub.distance = Console.ReadLine(); Console.WriteLine("what club are you going to h
1 of 1 New Topic/Question Reply 8 Replies - 25822 Views - Last Post: 11 January 2011 - 08:19 PM Rate Topic: #1 JBabineau D.I.C Head Reputation: 6 Posts: 68 Joined: 05-December http://www.dreamincode.net/forums/topic/209449-class-is-inaccessible-due-to-its-protection-level/ 08 Class is inaccessible due to its protection level Posted 11 January 2011 - 07:38 PM This issue I'm having is a compiler error of Class is inaccessible due to its protection level namespace http://softwareonastring.com/316/why-cant-my-test-access-a-public-constructor WindowsFormsApplication1 { static class Program { ///
access a public constructor? Posted on 20 December 2014 by Marjan Venema No Comments ↓ It's late in the afternoon. Almost time to go home. Just one issue to finish. A simple class that needs a couple of simple tests. Should be a breeze. Five minutes later you are ready to bang your head against your desk. The error messages keep flying. And you can't see why. If only you could fix this stupid "‘ActualProject.LateAfternoonMisery' is inaccessible due to its protection level" error, then you'd be home free. Literally. The class: namespace ActualProject { class LateAfternoonMisery { private int _MyInteger; public int AwesomeProperty { get {return _MyInteger; } } public LateAfternoonMisery() { _MyInteger = 42; } } } The test: namespace TestProject { [TestClass] public class LateAfternoonMisery_Tests { [TestMethod] public void LateAfternoonMisery_WhenConstructed_AwesomeProperty_ShouldReturn_DefaultValue() { var myLateAfternoonMisery = new LateAfternoonMisery(); Assert.AreEqual(myLateAfternoonMisery.AwesomeProperty, 42); } } } Classes don't get any simpler! It should just work! It is as if your Visual Studio and NUnit are plotting against you. Stop fretting. You still get to go home early. There are three easy fixes to this situation. Classes in C# are by default internal, not public. Which means that they are not visible outside the assembly in which they are used. So, to fix the error, you can: 1. Add the production unit to your test project You could add the LateAfternoonMisery.cs file to your test project, but… I would strongly recommend against that. In Visual Studio it feels like a bad practice to use files outside of the project folder tree. But quite apart from esthetics, you would have to do it for every .cs file you would want to test. And there are much easier ways of getting your hands on your LateAfternoonMisery class and any other classes you want to test. Just read on. 2. Declare the class public instead of internal public class LateAfternoonMisery While that is painless and Visual Studio usually adds the public accessibility when you add .cs files using any of the wizards, I still would recommend against that. The only classes that should be marked public in any assembly are the ones that provide the public interface of that assembly. All other classes should remain an internal implementation detail of that assembly. If only because if another assembly can use these classes, eventually one will and then you are stuck keeping it publi