Precision Error 10cm3 Pipette
Contents |
Ruskin University University of the percentage error of burette Arts London (UAL) Aston University Bangor University University of
Percentage Error Of 25cm3 Pipette
Bath Bath Spa University University of Bedfordshire University of Birmingham Birmingham City University University 10 cm3 measuring cylinder error of Bolton Bournemouth University BPP University University of Bradford University of Brighton University of Bristol Brunel University University of Buckingham Buckinghamshire New University percentage error of measuring cylinder University of Cambridge Canterbury Christ Church University Cardiff Metropolitan University Cardiff University University of Central Lancashire (UCLan) University of Chester University of Chichester City University London Coventry University University of Cumbria De Montfort University University of Derby University of Dundee Durham University University of East Anglia (UEA)
Burette And Pipette Accuracy
University of East London Edge Hill University University of Edinburgh Edinburgh Napier University University of Essex University of Exeter Falmouth University University of Glasgow Glasgow Caledonian University University of Gloucestershire Glynd?r University Goldsmiths University University of Greenwich Heriot-Watt University University of Hertfordshire University of Huddersfield University of Hull Imperial College, London Keele University University of Kent King's College London Kingston University Lancaster University University of Leeds Leeds Metropolitan University Leeds Trinity University University of Leicester University of Lincoln University of Liverpool Liverpool Hope University Liverpool John Moores University London Metropolitan University London School of Economics London South Bank University Loughborough University University of Manchester Manchester Metropolitan University (MMU) Middlesex University University of Newcastle New College of the Humanities University of Northampton Northumbria University University of Nottingham Nottingham Trent University Open University University of Oxford Oxford Brookes Universi
being actively developed between September 2011 and April 2012, and new content will be added on a day-to-day basis during that period. Please send any comments/suggestions 10cm3 measuring cylinder to graham.currell@uwe.ac.uk Study Text: "Essential Mathematics and Statistics for Science", 2nd ed, G pipette uncertainty Currell and A A Dowman (Wiley-Blackwell) QVA (questions and video answers) Tutorials Experimental errors and uncertaintiesStudy Text: Sections 1.2 (p2), 8.2
Accuracy Of Burette Pipette And Measuring Cylinder
(p217), 8.3 (p224) Experimental uncertainty and the normal distributionStudy Text: Section 8.1 (p212) Uncertainty and confidence interval of replicate measurementsStudy Text: Section 8.2 (p217) Introduction An experimental result is a ‘best estimate’ of the http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=363038 true value being measured, and •Error = True value – Experimental result The true value, and hence the actual error, is never usually known. The uncertainty in an experimental result (often just called the experimental error) is an estimate of the unknown possible error. In any experimental measurement there are two main types of possible errors: • Random errors – errors that change randomly if the measurement is repeated http://calcscience.uwe.ac.uk/experimental-errors.aspx under the same conditions. The magnitude of this possible error is described by the precision of the measurement. • Systematic errors – errors that remain constant if the measurement were to be repeated under the same conditions. The magnitude of this possible error is described by the bias in the measurement. Many chemists use the term accuracy to describe bias separately from precision. Good experimental design is used to reduce the bias in the experiment, possibly by using standards for comparison and by making measurements under different conditions to convert systematic errors into random errors. Replicate measurements (repeated measurements under the same conditions) and their analysis by statistical methods are used to quantify and counteract the effect of random errors. See Study Text: Section 1.2 Describing uncertainties/errors in a data value Standard deviation uncertainty is used to describe the uncertainty in repeated measurements giving an estimate of the variation in the individual measurments. The variations in many experimental measurements follow a normal distribution of values. It is expected that 68% of such replicated measurements would fall within the range of plus or minus one standard deviation, e.g. 3.72 ±0.06(sd) implies that repeated measurements would follow a normal distribution with 68% of values falling betwee
be down. Please try the request again. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Generated Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:27:06 GMT by s_wx1011 (squid/3.5.20)
be down. Please try the request again. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Generated Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:27:06 GMT by s_wx1011 (squid/3.5.20)