Compute The Multiple Standard Error Of Estimate
Contents |
the estimate from a scatter plot Compute the standard error of the estimate based on errors of prediction Compute the standard error using Pearson's correlation Estimate the standard compute the standard error of the estimate calculator error of the estimate based on a sample Figure 1 shows two compute the standard error of the estimate for the data below regression examples. You can see that in Graph A, the points are closer to the line than they are how to calculate standard error of estimate in excel in Graph B. Therefore, the predictions in Graph A are more accurate than in Graph B. Figure 1. Regressions differing in accuracy of prediction. The standard error of the estimate how to calculate standard error of estimate in regression is a measure of the accuracy of predictions. Recall that the regression line is the line that minimizes the sum of squared deviations of prediction (also called the sum of squares error). The standard error of the estimate is closely related to this quantity and is defined below: where σest is the standard error of the estimate, Y is an
How To Calculate Standard Error Of Estimate On Ti-84
actual score, Y' is a predicted score, and N is the number of pairs of scores. The numerator is the sum of squared differences between the actual scores and the predicted scores. Note the similarity of the formula for σest to the formula for σ.  It turns out that σest is the standard deviation of the errors of prediction (each Y - Y' is an error of prediction). Assume the data in Table 1 are the data from a population of five X, Y pairs. Table 1. Example data. X Y Y' Y-Y' (Y-Y')2 1.00 1.00 1.210 -0.210 0.044 2.00 2.00 1.635 0.365 0.133 3.00 1.30 2.060 -0.760 0.578 4.00 3.75 2.485 1.265 1.600 5.00 2.25 2.910 -0.660 0.436 Sum 15.00 10.30 10.30 0.000 2.791 The last column shows that the sum of the squared errors of prediction is 2.791. Therefore, the standard error of the estimate is There is a version of the formula for the standard error in terms of Pearson's correlation: where ρ is the population value of Pearson's cor
Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of
Calculate Standard Error Of Estimate Ti 83
this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn calculate standard error of estimate online more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Cross Validated Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ standard error of estimate calculator Cross Validated is a question and answer site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's http://onlinestatbook.com/2/regression/accuracy.html how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top Standard errors for multiple regression coefficients? up vote 7 down vote favorite 3 I realize that this is a very basic question, but I can't find an answer anywhere. I'm computing regression coefficients using either the normal equations or QR decomposition. How http://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/27916/standard-errors-for-multiple-regression-coefficients can I compute standard errors for each coefficient? I usually think of standard errors as being computed as: $SE_\bar{x}\ = \frac{\sigma_{\bar x}}{\sqrt{n}}$ What is $\sigma_{\bar x}$ for each coefficient? What is the most efficient way to compute this in the context of OLS? standard-error regression-coefficients share|improve this question asked May 7 '12 at 1:21 Belmont 3983512 add a comment| 1 Answer 1 active oldest votes up vote 12 down vote When doing least squares estimation (assuming a normal random component) the regression parameter estimates are normally distributed with mean equal to the true regression parameter and covariance matrix $\Sigma = s^2\cdot(X^TX)^{-1}$ where $s^2$ is the residual variance and $X^TX$ is the design matrix. $X^T$ is the transpose of $X$ and $X$ is defined by the model equation $Y=X\beta+\epsilon$ with $\beta$ the regression parameters and $\epsilon$ is the error term. The estimated standard deviation of a beta parameter is gotten by taking the corresponding term in $(X^TX)^{-1}$ multiplying it by the sample estimate of the residual variance and then taking the square root. This is not a very simple calculation but any software package will compute it for you and pr
the ANOVA table (often this is skipped). Interpreting the regression coefficients table. Confidence intervals for the slope parameters. Testing for statistical significance of coefficients Testing hypothesis on a slope parameter. Testing overall significance of the regressors. Predicting y given values of regressors. Excel limitations. There http://cameron.econ.ucdavis.edu/excel/ex61multipleregression.html is little extra to know beyond regression with one explanatory variable. The main addition is the F-test for overall fit. MULTIPLE REGRESSION USING THE DATA ANALYSIS ADD-IN This requires the Data Analysis Add-in: see Excel 2007: Access and Activating the Data Analysis Add-in The data used are in carsdata.xls We then create a new variable in cells C2:C6, cubed household size as a regressor. Then in cell C1 give the the heading CUBED HH SIZE. (It turns out that standard error for the se data squared HH SIZE has a coefficient of exactly 0.0 the cube is used). The spreadsheet cells A1:C6 should look like: We have regression with an intercept and the regressors HH SIZE and CUBED HH SIZE The population regression model is: y = β1 + β2 x2 + β3 x3 + u It is assumed that the error u is independent with constant variance (homoskedastic) - see EXCEL LIMITATIONS at the bottom. We wish to standard error of estimate the regression line: y = b1 + b2 x2 + b3 x3 We do this using the Data analysis Add-in and Regression. The only change over one-variable regression is to include more than one column in the Input X Range. Note, however, that the regressors need to be in contiguous columns (here columns B and C). If this is not the case in the original data, then columns need to be copied to get the regressors in contiguous columns. Hitting OK we obtain The regression output has three components: Regression statistics table ANOVA table Regression coefficients table. INTERPRET REGRESSION STATISTICS TABLE This is the following output. Of greatest interest is R Square. Explanation Multiple R 0.895828 R = square root of R2 R Square 0.802508 R2 Adjusted R Square 0.605016 Adjusted R2 used if more than one x variable Standard Error 0.444401 This is the sample estimate of the standard deviation of the error u Observations 5 Number of observations used in the regression (n) The above gives the overall goodness-of-fit measures: R2 = 0.8025 Correlation between y and y-hat is 0.8958 (when squared gives 0.8025). Adjusted R2 = R2 - (1-R2 )*(k-1)/(n-k) = .8025 - .1975*2/2 = 0.6050. The standard error here refers to the estimated standard deviation of the error term u. It is sometimes called the standard error of the regression. It equals sqrt(SSE/(n-k)). It is not to