Definition Of Standard Error In Regression
Contents |
it comes to determining how well a linear model fits the data. However, I've stated previously that R-squared is overrated. Is there a different goodness-of-fit statistic that can be more helpful? You bet! Today, I’ll highlight a sorely underappreciated regression the standard error of the estimate (for the regression) measures statistic: S, or the standard error of the regression. S provides important information that R-squared how to calculate standard error in regression analysis does not. What is the Standard Error of the Regression (S)? S becomes smaller when the data points are closer to the line. significance of standard error in regression analysis In the regression output for Minitab statistical software, you can find S in the Summary of Model section, right next to R-squared. Both statistics provide an overall measure of how well the model fits the data. S is known
What Does Standard Error Of Estimate Mean
both as the standard error of the regression and as the standard error of the estimate. S represents the average distance that the observed values fall from the regression line. Conveniently, it tells you how wrong the regression model is on average using the units of the response variable. Smaller values are better because it indicates that the observations are closer to the fitted line. The fitted line plot shown above is from my post where I standard error of regression coefficient use BMI to predict body fat percentage. S is 3.53399, which tells us that the average distance of the data points from the fitted line is about 3.5% body fat. Unlike R-squared, you can use the standard error of the regression to assess the precision of the predictions. Approximately 95% of the observations should fall within plus/minus 2*standard error of the regression from the regression line, which is also a quick approximation of a 95% prediction interval. For the BMI example, about 95% of the observations should fall within plus/minus 7% of the fitted line, which is a close match for the prediction interval. Why I Like the Standard Error of the Regression (S) In many cases, I prefer the standard error of the regression over R-squared. I love the practical, intuitiveness of using the natural units of the response variable. And, if I need precise predictions, I can quickly check S to assess the precision. Conversely, the unit-less R-squared doesn’t provide an intuitive feel for how close the predicted values are to the observed values. Further, as I detailed here, R-squared is relevant mainly when you need precise predictions. However, you can’t use R-squared to assess the precision, which ultimately leaves it unhelpful. To illustrate this, let’s go back to the BMI example. The regression model produces an R-squared of 76.1% and S is 3.53399% body fat. Su
the estimate from a scatter plot Compute the standard error of the estimate based on errors of prediction Compute the standard error using Pearson's correlation Estimate the standard error of the estimate based on a sample Figure 1 shows standard error of regression stata two regression examples. You can see that in Graph A, the points are closer
Standard Error Of Regression Interpretation
to the line than they are in Graph B. Therefore, the predictions in Graph A are more accurate than in Graph B.
Standard Error Linear Regression
Figure 1. Regressions differing in accuracy of prediction. The standard error of the estimate is a measure of the accuracy of predictions. Recall that the regression line is the line that minimizes the sum of http://blog.minitab.com/blog/adventures-in-statistics/regression-analysis-how-to-interpret-s-the-standard-error-of-the-regression squared deviations of prediction (also called the sum of squares error). The standard error of the estimate is closely related to this quantity and is defined below: where σest is the standard error of the estimate, Y is an actual score, Y' is a predicted score, and N is the number of pairs of scores. The numerator is the sum of squared differences between the actual scores and the predicted scores. http://onlinestatbook.com/2/regression/accuracy.html Note the similarity of the formula for σest to the formula for σ.  It turns out that σest is the standard deviation of the errors of prediction (each Y - Y' is an error of prediction). Assume the data in Table 1 are the data from a population of five X, Y pairs. Table 1. Example data. X Y Y' Y-Y' (Y-Y')2 1.00 1.00 1.210 -0.210 0.044 2.00 2.00 1.635 0.365 0.133 3.00 1.30 2.060 -0.760 0.578 4.00 3.75 2.485 1.265 1.600 5.00 2.25 2.910 -0.660 0.436 Sum 15.00 10.30 10.30 0.000 2.791 The last column shows that the sum of the squared errors of prediction is 2.791. Therefore, the standard error of the estimate is There is a version of the formula for the standard error in terms of Pearson's correlation: where ρ is the population value of Pearson's correlation and SSY is For the data in Table 1, μy = 2.06, SSY = 4.597 and ρ= 0.6268. Therefore, which is the same value computed previously. Similar formulas are used when the standard error of the estimate is computed from a sample rather than a population. The only difference is that the denominator is N-2 rather than N. The reason N-2 is used rathe
Ana-Maria ŠimundićEditor-in-ChiefDepartment of Medical Laboratory DiagnosticsUniversity Hospital "Sveti Duh"Sveti Duh 6410 000 Zagreb, CroatiaPhone: +385 1 3712-021e-mail address:editorial_office [at] biochemia-medica [dot] com Useful links Events http://www.biochemia-medica.com/content/standard-error-meaning-and-interpretation Follow us on Facebook Home Standard error: meaning and interpretation Lessons in biostatistics Mary L. McHugh. Standard error: meaning and interpretation. Biochemia Medica 2008;18(1):7-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2008.002 School of Nursing, University of Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA *Corresponding author: Mary [dot] McHugh [at] uchsc [dot] edu Abstract Standard error statistics are a class of inferential statistics that function somewhat like descriptive standard error statistics in that they permit the researcher to construct confidence intervals about the obtained sample statistic. The confidence interval so constructed provides an estimate of the interval in which the population parameter will fall. The two most commonly used standard error statistics are the standard error of the mean and the standard error of the estimate. The standard error standard error of of the mean permits the researcher to construct a confidence interval in which the population mean is likely to fall. The formula, (1-P) (most often P < 0.05) is the probability that the population mean will fall in the calculated interval (usually 95%). The Standard Error of the estimate is the other standard error statistic most commonly used by researchers. This statistic is used with the correlation measure, the Pearson R. It can allow the researcher to construct a confidence interval within which the true population correlation will fall. The computations derived from the r and the standard error of the estimate can be used to determine how precise an estimate of the population correlation is the sample correlation statistic. The standard error is an important indicator of how precise an estimate of the population parameter the sample statistic is. Taken together with such measures as effect size, p-value and sample size, the effect size can be a useful tool to the researcher who seeks to understand the accuracy of statistics calculated on random samples. Key words