Delta Method Standard Error Example
Contents |
transformed regression parameters in R using the delta method? The purpose of this page is to introduce estimation of standard errors using the delta method. Examples include manual calculation of standard errors via the
Delta Method Standard Error Of Variance
delta method and then confirmation using the function deltamethod so that the reader may understand delta method standard error stata the calculations and know how to use deltamethod. This page uses the following packages Make sure that you can load them before trying delta method example econometrics to run the examples on this page. We will need the msm package to use the deltamethodfunction. If you do not have a package installed, run: install.packages("packagename"), or if you see the version is out of date,
Multivariate Delta Method Example
run: update.packages(). library(msm) Version info: Code for this page was tested in R version 3.1.1 (2014-07-10)
On: 2014-08-01
With: pequod 0.0-3; msm 1.4; phia 0.1-5; effects 3.0-0; colorspace 1.2-4; RColorBrewer 1.0-5; xtable 1.7-3; car 2.0-20; foreign 0.8-61; Hmisc 3.14-4; Formula 1.1-2; survival 2.37-7; lattice 0.20-29; mgcv 1.8-1; nlme 3.1-117; png 0.1-7; gridExtra 0.9.1; reshape2 1.4; ggplot2 1.0.0; vcd 1.3-1; rjson 0.2.14; RSQLite 0.11.4; DBI 0.2-7; knitr 1.6 Background to delta method Often in addition
Standard Error Of Measurement Example
to reporting parameters fit by a model, we need to report some transformation of these parameters. The transformation can generate the point estimates of our desired values, but the standard errors of these point estimates are not so easily calculated. They can, however, be well approximated using the delta method. The delta method approximates the standard errors of transformations of random variable using a first-order Taylor approximation. Regression coefficients are themselves random variables, so we can use the delta method to approximate the standard errors of their transformations. Although the delta method is often appropriate to use with large samples, this page is by no means an endorsement of the use of the delta method over other methods to estimate standard errors, such as bootstrapping. Essentially, the delta method involves calculating the variance of the Taylor series approximation of a function. We, thus, first get the Taylor series approximation of the function using the first two terms of the Taylor expansion of the transformation function about the mean of of the random variable. Let \(G\) be the transformation function and \(U\) be the mean vector of random variables \(X=(x1,x2,...)\). The first two terms of the Taylor expansion are then an approximation for \(G(X)\), $$ G(X) \approx G(U) + \nabla G(U)^T \cdot (X-U) $$ where \(\nabla G(X)\) is the gradient of \(G(X)\), or a ve
In statistics, the delta method is a result concerning the approximate probability distribution for a function of an asymptotically normal statistical estimator from knowledge of standard error of mean example the limiting variance of that estimator. Contents 1 Univariate delta method 1.1
Standard Error Of Estimate Example
Proof in the univariate case 1.1.1 Proof with an explicit order of approximation 2 Multivariate delta method 3 standard error example statistics Example 4 Note 5 See also 6 References 7 External links Univariate delta method[edit] While the delta method generalizes easily to a multivariate setting, careful motivation of the technique http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/r/faq/deltamethod.htm is more easily demonstrated in univariate terms. Roughly, if there is a sequence of random variables Xn satisfying n [ X n − θ ] → D N ( 0 , σ 2 ) , {\displaystyle {{\sqrt {n}}[X_{n}-\theta ]\,{\xrightarrow {D}}\,{\mathcal {N}}(0,\sigma ^{2})},} where θ and σ2 are finite valued constants and → D {\displaystyle {\xrightarrow {D}}} denotes convergence in distribution, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delta_method then n [ g ( X n ) − g ( θ ) ] → D N ( 0 , σ 2 [ g ′ ( θ ) ] 2 ) {\displaystyle {{\sqrt {n}}[g(X_{n})-g(\theta )]\,{\xrightarrow {D}}\,{\mathcal {N}}(0,\sigma ^{2}[g'(\theta )]^{2})}} for any function g satisfying the property that g′(θ) exists and is non-zero valued. Proof in the univariate case[edit] Demonstration of this result is fairly straightforward under the assumption that g′(θ) is continuous. To begin, we use the mean value theorem (i.e.: the first order approximation of a Taylor series using Taylor's theorem): g ( X n ) = g ( θ ) + g ′ ( θ ~ ) ( X n − θ ) , {\displaystyle g(X_{n})=g(\theta )+g'({\tilde {\theta }})(X_{n}-\theta ),} where θ ~ {\displaystyle {\tilde {\theta }}} lies between Xn and θ. Note that since X n → P θ {\displaystyle X_{n}\,{\xrightarrow {P}}\,\theta } and X n < θ ~ < θ {\displaystyle X_{n}<{\tilde {\theta }}<\theta } , it must be that θ ~ → P θ {\displaystyle {\tilde {\theta }}\,{\xrightarrow {P}}\,\theta } and since gâ
non-linear transformation * Stata do file * The Delta method can be used to estimate the standard errors after a regression estimation. * Imagine you have some parameter G = (3*b0-b1)*b2^2 = 3*b0*b2^2-b1*b2^2 http://www.econometricsbysimulation.com/2012/12/the-delta-method-to-estimate-standard.html * Where y = bo + b1*x1 + b2*x2 + u * The delta method can be used to estimate the standard errors of G. * The delta method states that var_hat(G)=(dG/db) var(b) (dG/db) * dG/db is a gradient vector: * dG/db = [dG/db0, dG/db1, dG/db2] * dG/db = [b2^2, -b2^2, 2*(b0-b1)*b2] * var_hat(G) = (3*b2^2)^2 * se(b0)^-2 + (-b2^2)^2 * se(b1)^-2 standard error + (2*(b0-b1)*b2)^2 * se(b2)^-2 [There is an error in the code because I failed to include a covariance term for the coefficients. Please see the more recent update on the method.] clear set obs 1000 gen x1 = rnormal() gen x2 = rnormal() * 4 global b0 = 1 global b1 = 1.5 global b2 = .3 local true_G = (3*${b0}-${b1})*${b2}^2 di standard error of `true_G' gen y = ${b0} + ${b1}*x1 + ${b2}*x2 + rnormal()*8 reg y x1 x2 * G = (3*b0-b1)*b2^2 = 3*b0*b2^2 - b1*b2^2 local Ghat = (3*_b[_cons]-_b[x1])*_b[x2]^2 di "Ghat = `Ghat' is our estimate (true = `true_G')" * Let's see if we can't use the delta method to derive a standard error. local var_hatG = (3*_b[x2]^2)^2 * _se[_cons]^2 + (-_b[x2]^2)^2 * _se[x1]^2 + (2*(_b[_cons]-_b[x1])*_b[x2])^2 * _se[x2]^2 di "Standard error estimate is " `var_hatG'^.5 * Alternatively, let us attempt to bootstrap our standard errors. cap program drop deltaOLS program define deltaOLS, rclass reg y x1 x2 return scalar Ghat = (3*_b[_cons]-_b[x1])*_b[x2]^2 end bs Ghat=r(Ghat), rep(500): deltaOLS * The bootstrap standard errors are similar to that of the delta method's standard errors. cap program drop deltaMonteCarlo program define deltaMonteCarlo, rclass clear set obs 1000 gen x1 = rnormal() gen x2 = rnormal() * 4 gen y = ${b0} + ${b1}*x1 + ${b2}*x2 + rnormal()*8 reg y x1 x2 return scalar Ghat = (3*_b[_cons]-_b[x1])*_b[x2]^2 end simulate Ghat=r(Ghat), reps(500): deltaMonteCarlo sum * We can see that our estimates of th