Empirical Standard Error Sas
Contents |
with the REPEATED statement and its options or with options in the MODEL statement. For details, see standard error sas proc means the section ODS Table Names. Model Information The "Model Information" table
Calculate Standard Error In Sas
displays the two-level data set name, the response distribution, the link function, the response variable name, the robust standard error sas offset variable name, the frequency variable name, the scale weight variable name, the number of observations used, the number of events if events/trials format is used for response, standard deviation sas the number of trials if events/trials format is used for response, the sum of frequency weights, the number of missing values in data set, and the number of invalid observations (for example, negative or 0 response values with gamma distribution or number of observations with events greater than trials with binomial distribution). Class Level Information If
Confidence Interval Sas
you use classification variables in the model, PROC GENMOD displays the levels of classification variables specified in the CLASS statement and in the MODEL statement. The levels are displayed in the same sorted order used to generate columns in the design matrix. Response Profile If you specify an ordinal model for the multinomial distribution, a table titled "Response Profile" is displayed containing the ordered values of the response variable and the number of occurrences of the values used in the model. Iteration History for Parameter Estimates If you specify the ITPRINT model option, PROC GENMOD displays a table containing the following for each iteration in the Newton-Raphson procedure for model fitting: the iteration number, the ridge value, the log likelihood, and values of all parameters in the model. Criteria for Assessing Goodness of Fit In the "Criteria for Assessing Goodness of Fit" table, PROC GENMOD displays the degrees of freedom for deviance and Pearson’s chi-square, equal to the number of observations minus the number of regression
function. These and other options in the PROC MIXED statement variance sas are then described fully in alphabetical order. Table 56.2 t test sas PROC MIXED Statement Options Option Description Basic Options DATA= specifies input data set METHOD=
Coefficient Of Variation Sas
specifies the estimation method NOPROFILE includes scale parameter in optimization ORDER= determines the sort order of CLASS variables Displayed Output ASYCORR displays asymptotic https://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/63347/HTML/default/statug_genmod_sect055.htm correlation matrix of covariance parameter estimates ASYCOV displays asymptotic covariance matrix of covariance parameter estimates CL requests confidence limits for covariance parameter estimates COVTEST displays asymptotic standard errors and Wald tests for covariance parameters IC displays a table of information criteria ITDETAILS displays estimates and gradients added https://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/63033/HTML/default/statug_mixed_sect008.htm to "Iteration History" LOGNOTE writes periodic status notes to the log MMEQ displays mixed model equations MMEQSOL displays the solution to the mixed model equations NOCLPRINT suppresses "Class Level Information" completely or in parts NOITPRINT suppresses "Iteration History" table PLOTS produces ODS statistical graphics RATIO produces ratio of covariance parameter estimates with residual variance Optimization Options MAXFUNC= specifies the maximum number of likelihood evaluations MAXITER= specifies the maximum number of iterations Computational Options CONVF requests and tunes the relative function convergence criterion CONVG requests and tunes the relative gradient convergence criterion CONVH requests and tunes the relative Hessian convergence criterion DFBW selects between-within degree of freedom method EMPIRICAL computes empirical ("sandwich") estimators NOBOUND unbounds covariance parameter estimates RIDGE= specifies starting value for minimum ridge value SCORING= applies Fisher scoring where applicable You can specify the following options. ABSOLUTE
on statistics Stata Journal Stata Press Stat/Transfer Gift Shop Purchase Order Stata Request a quote Purchasing FAQs Bookstore Stata Press books Books on Stata Books on statistics http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/statistics/xtgee-versus-proc-genmod/ Stat/Transfer Stata Journal Gift Shop Training NetCourses Classroom and web On-site Video tutorials Third-party courses Support Updates Documentation Installation Guide FAQs Register Stata Technical services Policy Contact Publications Bookstore Stata Journal Stata News Conferences and meetings Stata Conference Upcoming meetings Proceedings Email alerts Statalist The Stata Blog Web resources Author Support Program Installation Qualification Tool Disciplines Company StataCorp Contact us Hours of operation standard error Announcements Customer service Register Stata online Change registration Change address Subscribe to Stata News Subscribe to email alerts International resellers Careers Our sites Statalist The Stata Blog Stata Press Stata Journal Advanced search Site index Purchase Products Training Support Company >> Home >> Resources & support >> FAQs >> xtgee and SAS standard errors Why do Stata’s xtgee standard errors differ standard error sas from those reported by SAS’s PROC GENMOD? Title Interpreting standard errors produced by Stata’s xtgee and SAS’s proc GENMOD Author James Hardin, StataCorp Question A user asked I tried to run the same model using Stata’s xtgee and SAS’s PROC GENMOD. I get the same coefficient estimates and working correlation matrix but different standard errors. xtgee seems to be consistently lower. I’m using a Poisson distribution and exchangeable correlation. Answer The part of the SAS output titled “Analysis of initial estimates” is the output for a pooled Poisson estimator (which is almost identical to the GEE output since the extra correlation parameter is nearly zero). What SAS calls “empirical standard errors” are (almost) equal to what Stata calls “robust standard errors”. They are not exactly equal because Stata multiplies clustered robust variance matrices by a factor equal to C/(C − 1), where C is the number of clusters. Run the xtpoisson/xtgee with the robust option and you will see this relationship. SAS also has an option to the REPEATED statement called MODELSE where you will get “model standard errors” instead of “empirical standard errors”. If you use th