Physics Systematic Error
Contents |
the design of the experiment.
How To Reduce Systematic Error
Systematic errors cannot be estimated by repeating the experiment with the same equipment. Consider again the
Personal Error
example of measuring an oscillation period with a stopwatch. Suppose that the stopwatch is running slow. This will lead to underestimation of all our time results. Systematic errors, unlike random errors, random error calculation shift the results always in one direction. Systematic errors are much harder to estimate than random errors. After all, how could we have known beforehand that our stopwatch was unreliable? In order to identify systematic errors, we should understand the nature of the experiment and the instruments involved. Sometimes you will encounter significant systematic errors in your experiments. If you suspect that your measurements are biased, you should try to identify the possible sources of systematic error. << Previous Page Next Page >> Home - Credits - Feedback © Columbia University
the design of the experiment. instrumental error Systematic errors cannot be estimated by repeating the experiment with the same equipment. Consider again the https://phys.columbia.edu/~tutorial/rand_v_sys/tut_e_5_2.html example of measuring an oscillation period with a stopwatch. Suppose that the stopwatch is running slow. This will lead to underestimation of all our time results. Systematic errors, unlike random errors, https://phys.columbia.edu/~tutorial/rand_v_sys/tut_e_5_2.html shift the results always in one direction. Systematic errors are much harder to estimate than random errors. After all, how could we have known beforehand that our stopwatch was unreliable? In order to identify systematic errors, we should understand the nature of the experiment and the instruments involved. Sometimes you will encounter significant systematic errors in your experiments. If you suspect that your measurements are biased, you should try to identify the possible sources of systematic error. << Previous Page Next Page >> Home - Credits - Feedback © Columbia University
of the measurement device. Random errors usually result from the experimenter's inability to take the same measurement in exactly https://www2.southeastern.edu/Academics/Faculty/rallain/plab193/labinfo/Error_Analysis/05_Random_vs_Systematic.html the same way to get exact the same number. Systematic http://felix.physics.sunysb.edu/~allen/252/PHY_error_analysis.html errors, by contrast, are reproducible inaccuracies that are consistently in the same direction. Systematic errors are often due to a problem which persists throughout the entire experiment. Note that systematic and random errors refer to problems associated with making measurements. Mistakes made systematic error in the calculations or in reading the instrument are not considered in error analysis. It is assumed that the experimenters are careful and competent! How to minimize experimental error: some examples Type of Error Example How to minimize it Random errors You measure the mass of a ring three times using the same how to reduce balance and get slightly different values: 17.46 g, 17.42 g, 17.44 g Take more data. Random errors can be evaluated through statistical analysis and can be reduced by averaging over a large number of observations. Systematic errors The cloth tape measure that you use to measure the length of an object had been stretched out from years of use. (As a result, all of your length measurements were too small.)The electronic scale you use reads 0.05 g too high for all your mass measurements (because it is improperly tared throughout your experiment). Systematic errors are difficult to detect and cannot be analyzed statistically, because all of the data is off in the same direction (either to high or too low). Spotting and correcting for systematic error takes a lot of care. How would you compensate for the incorrect results of using the stretched out tape measure? How would you correct the measurements from improperly tared scale?
in measuring the time required for a weight to fall to the floor, a random error will occur when an experimenter attempts to push a button that starts a timer simultaneously with the release of the weight. If this random error dominates the fall time measurement, then if we repeat the measurement many times (N times) and plot equal intervals (bins) of the fall time ti on the horizontal axis against the number of times a given fall time ti occurs on the vertical axis, our results (see histogram below) should approach an ideal bell-shaped curve (called a Gaussian distribution) as the number of measurements N becomes very large. The best estimate of the true fall time t is the mean value (or average value) of the distribution: átñ = (SNi=1 ti)/N . If the experimenter squares each deviation from the mean, averages the squares, and takes the square root of that average, the result is a quantity called the "root-mean-square" or the "standard deviation" s of the distribution. It measures the random error or the statistical uncertainty of the individual measurement ti: s = Ö[SNi=1(ti - átñ)2 / (N-1) ].
About two-thirds of all the measurements have a deviation less than one s from the mean and 95% of all measurements are within two s of the mean. In accord with our intuition that the uncertainty of the mean should be smaller than the uncertainty of any single measurement, measurement theory shows that in the case of random errors the standard deviation of the mean smean is given by: sm = s / ÖN , where N again is the number of measurements used to determine the mean. Then the result of the N measurements of the fall time would be quoted as t = átñ ± sm. Whenever you make a measurement that is repeated N times, you are supposed to calculate the mean value and its standard deviation as just described. For a large number of measurements this procedure is somewhat tedious. If you have a calculator with statistical functions it may do the job for you. There is also a simplified prescription for estimating the random error which you can use. Assume you have measured the fall time about ten times. In this case it is reasonable to assume that the largest measurement tmax is approximately +2s from the mean, and the smallest tmin<