Application Error Handler
Contents |
resources Windows Server 2012 resources Programs MSDN subscriptions Overview Benefits Administrators Students Microsoft Imagine Microsoft Student Partners ISV Startups TechRewards Events Community Magazine Forums Blogs Channel 9 Documentation APIs and reference
C# Application Exception Handler
Dev centers Retired content Samples We’re sorry. The content you requested has been wpf application exception handler removed. You’ll be auto redirected in 1 second. MSDN Library MSDN Library MSDN Library MSDN Library Design Tools
Delphi Application Exception Handler
Development Tools and Languages Mobile and Embedded Development .NET Development Office development Online Services Open Specifications patterns & practices Servers and Enterprise Development Speech Technologies Web Development Windows Desktop App Development asp.net application error handling TOC Collapse the table of content Expand the table of content This documentation is archived and is not being maintained. This documentation is archived and is not being maintained. Complete Example for Error Handlers Other Versions Visual Studio 2010 .NET Framework 4 Visual Studio 2008 This code example includes elements for both page-level and application-level exception handling. Code Example Files The example consists how to handle application error in global.asax in mvc of the following files: Web.config Global.asax Default.aspx ExceptionUtility (to be put in the App_Code folder) GenericErrorPage.aspx HttpErrorPage.aspx Http404ErrorPage.aspx DefaultRedirectErrorPage.aspx Web.config The following example shows the Web.config file. The customErrors section specifies how to handle errors that occur with file types that are mapped to ASP.NET, such as .aspx, .asmx, and .ashx files. (In IIS 6.0 and in IIS 7.0 in classic mode, static content files such as .html and .jpg files are not mapped to ASP.NET.) The settings in the example customErrors section cause any unhandled HTTP 404 (file not found) errors to be directed to the Http404ErrorPage.aspx file. These HTTP 404 errors would occur if a request were made for an .aspx file, .asmx file, and so on and if the requested file did not exist. All other unhandled errors in ASP.NET files are directed to the DefaultRedirectErrorPage.aspx file. If static content files are not handled by ASP.NET, a request for a nonexistent .html or .jpg file does not cause a redirect to the Http404ErrorPage.aspx file. If you want ASP.NET to handle requests for all file types, you can configure IIS to map file
processing – often changing the normal flow of program execution. It is provided by specialized programming language constructs or computer hardware mechanisms. In general,
C# Console Application Error Handling
an exception is handled (resolved) by saving the current state of asp.net error handling best practices execution in a predefined place and switching the execution to a specific subroutine known as an exception
Application Error Event In Global Asax
handler. If exceptions are continuable, the handler may later resume the execution at the original location using the saved information. For example, a floating point divide by zero https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb397417.aspx exception will typically, by default, allow the program to be resumed, while an out of memory condition might not be resolvable transparently. Alternative approaches to exception handling in software are error checking, which maintains normal program flow with later explicit checks for contingencies reported using special return values or some auxiliary global variable such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exception_handling C's errno or floating point status flags; or input validation to preemptively filter exceptional cases. Some programmers write software with error reporting features that collect details that may be helpful in fixing the problem, and display those details on the screen, or store them to a file such as a core dump, or in some cases an automatic error reporting system such as Windows Error Reporting can automatically phone home and email those details to the programmers. Contents 1 Exception handling in hardware 1.1 Hardware exception handling/traps: IEEE 754 floating point 2 Exception handling in software 2.1 History 2.2 Termination semantics 2.3 Criticism 2.4 Exception support in programming languages 2.5 Exception handling implementation 2.6 Exception handling based on design by contract 2.7 Uncaught exceptions 2.8 Static checking of exceptions 2.8.1 Checked exceptions 2.8.2 Views on usage 2.9 Dynamic checking of exceptions 2.10 Exception synchronicity 2.11 Condition systems 2.11.1 Continuable exceptions 2.11.2 Restarts separate mechanism from policy 3 See also 4 References 5 External
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6518979/catch-all-error-handling-on-application-level Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads https://staticapps.org/articles/front-end-error-handling/ with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Catch-all error handling on application level? up vote 1 down vote favorite I application error have a WPF form with a couple of buttons, and for each button I have error handling code: try {bla bla} catch(Exception e){ more bla } Is there any way I can set something up on the application level or something that will just catch all uncaught errors and display some generic message/ log the error? Now I have to create handling for every button so the code doesn't crash. application exception handler It's an internal app so just displaying the message from whatever was thrown down there will suffice. After that the app would just wait for the next button click, so it wouldn't have to do anything afterwards. There so much repetive code right now, wondering if there is some way to consolidate that and only deal with cases where there is a specific way to handle a specific error. Regards Gert-Jan c# wpf share|improve this question edited Jun 29 '11 at 10:46 asked Jun 29 '11 at 10:12 gjvdkamp 4,34611934 6 If I were you I would try and fix the cause of all those exceptions first. –Joe Jun 29 '11 at 10:13 Windows forms, web app, what kind of app is this? –Alex R. Jun 29 '11 at 10:15 Beside fixing all those exceptions, I would like to to read about Generics that can lead you to reduce boiler-plate coding in your application and last but not the least, you can register for App Domain level error handler to handle all exceptions. –Furqan Jun 29 '11 at 10:16 @Furqan do you have a link for that maybe? –gjvdkamp Jun 29 '11 at 10:18 @Joe It's mostly
rarely go right all the time in the real world. Error handling is a vital part of any application's user experience, and if done well, can leave your users feeling informed and properly considered. Most errors that an application encounters can be grouped into a few categories: Input Errors: Information provided by the user is unacceptable for some reason. This includes errors from form validation, duplicate actions, uniqueness issues, resources not found, etc. Authorization Errors: A user is attempting to perform an action to which he/she does not have permission. Availability Errors: A resource that is needed to complete the user's action is unavailable for some reason. This may be expected (scheduled maintenance) or unexpected (server crash!). Unexpected Errors: These are errors that likely indicate a bug in the application, such as unhandled exceptions. Almost every application will have instances of each of these error categories at some point. Handling each appropriately is key to keeping users who encounter errors from becoming angry users. Front-End vs. Back-End Error Handling In web application back-ends, expected errors are usually handled by displaying or responding with some kind of error message, while unexpected errors will short circuit the normal response process and display a generic error page. Applications that are very poorly configured might even spit out internal error details to the end user. For the most part, back-end applications are not always good at helping a user recover from an error, but they are pretty good at letting the user know something is wrong. Front-end applications, for better or worse, have no built-in mechanism for halting everything and displaying an error message. When a JavaScript error occurs, usually one of three things happens: The application keeps running, but something the user expected to happen doesn't happen. The most common user response to this type of error is simply to try the action again (and again) hoping it will "work this time." The application stops running but displays no sign that it has stopped. The user will retry the action (or try to perform a different one) to no avail. If the error happened early enough, the entire page may be prevented from being properly set up and the user will just see a white screen. These scenarios, from a user experience perspective, are terrible. They are likely to lead to user frustration, a feeling of helplessness, and eventual anger. Front-end applications are in many ways more flexible than back-end appli