Bad Request 400 Error When Post Is Over 65k
Contents |
ASP.NET Community Standup Forums Help Home/ASP.NET Forums/Retired Forums/WCF REST Starter Kit (RETIRED)/Bad Request 400 Error When Post is over 65K Bad Request 400 Error When Post 400 bad request chrome is over 65K RSS 1 reply Last post Jan 25, 2009 06:54
400 Bad Request Request Header Or Cookie Too Large
PM by flipfly ‹ Previous Thread|Next Thread › Print Share Twitter Facebook Email Shortcuts Active Threads Unanswered Threads Unresolved 400 bad request nginx Threads Support Options Advanced Search Reply flipfly None 0 Points 2 Posts Bad Request 400 Error When Post is over 65K Jan 23, 2009 12:24 PM|flipfly|LINK I've been searching all http error 400 bad request over the web to figure out how and where to make the adjustment that will allow our WCF REST service to accept a POX post that is over 65K. Most of the topics out there on changing the MaxReceivedMessageSize in web.config are on the original WCF configuration (lots of web.config entries). The WCF REST Starter Kit does not have the typical web.config
400 Bad Request Android
entries for making the change on MaxReceivedMessageSize. Any ideas? Thanks! WCF REST Starter Kit MaxReceivedMessageSize POX Reply flipfly None 0 Points 2 Posts Re: Bad Request 400 Error When Post is over 65K Jan 25, 2009 06:54 PM|flipfly|LINK Never give up! I found the answer from the WCF REST Starter Kit Overview. Apparently, the zero configuration hides a lot of settings and it's a little difficult to find documentation right now. By getting a reference to the WebServiceHost2 in the .svc fileand changing the MaxMessageSize, I was able to get around the 65K default limit. Now I'm able to post larger XML documents. The statement below answers the question: Hosting Settings The WCF REST Starter Kit optimizes for a zero-configuration experience. In .NET Framework 3.5, WebServiceHost class was added to WCF that enables a zero-config experience for the basic scenarios. However the user needed to fall back to advanced configuration when tweaking any of the deployment time settings such as the max message size. In the WCF REST Starter Kit, we have introduced an approach where the zero configuration experience is pres
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to size of a request header field exceeds server limit apache any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and your browser sent a request that this server could not understand. apache policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn
Bad Request - Request Too Long Chrome
more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community http://forums.asp.net/t/1375070.aspx?Bad+Request+400+Error+When+Post+is+over+65K Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up WCF REST service 400 Bad Request up vote 0 down vote favorite I have WCF RESTful service and Android client. Server replies with 400 when I do http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6599355/wcf-rest-service-400-bad-request bigger request. It seems that I have 65k limit issue like in here or in other million posts on same problem. However, I can't seem to be able to fix it. Here is how my web.config looks
the "400 Bad Request" error message from a website Posted on October 24, 2012 by Timour Rashed Problem: Whenever you access any website from a specific domain. For example http://www.abc.com/morepages/…. http://timourrashed.com/how-to-fix-the-400-bad-request-error-message-from-a-website/ In the URL above, the domain is "abc.com" and "morepages" is a sub-site. The problem shows as the following: Bad Request Your browser sent a request that this server could not understand. Size of http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/httpserv/ihsdiag/errorlog.html a request header field exceeds server limit. Cookie ----------------- Solution: It wasn't clear at first but the error message is telling me exactly what the problem is (the keyword here ladies and gentlemen bad request is "cookie") The problem was due to a cookie that has become corrupted. Not sure how it got that way but it seems that the last time it was generated something went wrong. The easy solution is to delete all your cookies but here is the best way to solve that specific issue, I have created a customized guide for Firefox, Chrome, and Internet Explorer. Firefox 1. Access 400 bad request the options from the main menu 2. Go to the Privacy tab 3. Click "remove individual cookies" 4. You will get the window below and you can search for cookies on that specific domain (in our example abc.com) 5. To delete the cookies, just select and click "Remove Cookie" 6. Try accessing the site again, if you still have issues you can repeat from step 4 Internet Explorer 1. Access the options from the main menu Tools -> Internet Options 2. Select Settings under the "Browsing history" section in the General tab 3. Select "View files" 4. You can search for those cookies and manually delete them Google Chrome 1. Click on Settings 2. Enter "cookies" in the search field then click "Content settings" 3. Click "All cookies and site data" under Cookies 4. Select the specific cookie to delete the cookie ----------------- If you found this article useful, don’t forget to share it by clicking one of the buttons below. You can also share your thoughts in the comments section below. That should fix the error message "400 Bad Request", if you have any questions or concerns please leave a comment below. You can also follow me on Twitter, add
[alert] (12)Cannot allocate memory: apr_thread_create: unable to create worker thread To resolve the crash (usually 32-bit) or high "memory" (really VSZ) symptom, see the dedicated topic here: apr_thread_create.html [error] server reached MaxClients setting, consider raising the MaxClients setting At the time the message was written, there were not any worker threads, or child processes in V1.3, available to process additional requests. I.e., all child processes/threads are already in use handling existing requests. The message is only written once during the life of the server, but the peak condition may happen any number of times after the message is logged. mod_mpmstats for IBM HTTP Server V2.0 and above provides better reporting of this condition; in particular, it can report when the MaxClients condition has been reached as often as once every 90 seconds. The web server does not take any action when the MaxClients condition is reached. In many cases the condition will be corrected when a temporary application slow-down is resolved and threads, or child processes in V1.3, can finish their current requests and become free to handle new connections. If there is no suspected application slowdown, the customer may need to increase MaxClients to increase the peak capacity of the web server. This type of tuning is described in the IBM HTTP Server Performance Tuning document. As described in that information, the customer can get a good idea of how many of the IBM HTTP Server child processes/threads are in use at a given time by activating mod_status and checking the server-status page, or by monitoring with mod_mpmstats. This is an important message to watch out for when there is a symptom such as a hung server. In some types of hang conditions (e.g., all IBM HTTP Server child process/threads tied up waiting for the application server to respond, and the application server isn't responding because the application processing the request is hung), this "MaxClients" message will be written to the error log. In conf