Putty Proxy Error Connection Not Allowed By Ruleset
Contents |
JavaScript and much of it will not work correctly without it enabled. Please turn JavaScript back socks connection not allowed by ruleset securecrt on and reload this page. All Places >
Socket Connection Not Allowed By Ruleset
Developers > Openfire Dev > Discussions Please enter a title. You can "socketexception: socks: connection not allowed by ruleset" not post a blank message. Please type your message and try again. 4 Replies Latest reply on Jul 29, 2009 err_socks_connection_failed 7:24 AM by gamitech Problems setting up SOCKS proxy connection drjpierce Aug 1, 2007 2:19 PM I''m building a custom XMPP client to do some fun XMPP-as-middleware work. I''m currently trying to get a target client to set up a SOCKS bytestream using the Openfire proxy (doing the connection directly from the target to the initiator works fine). However, I''m running into the following behavior with Openfire 3.3.2:1. If I''m running Openfire on the same machine as the client, I get a 0x02 (connection not allowed by ruleset) reply when issuing the connect command and the following error in Openfire:Error processing file transfer proxy connectionjava.io.IOException: Illegal proxy transferat org.jivesoftware.openfire.filetransfer.proxy.ProxyConnectionManager.processConn ection(ProxyConnectionManager.java:187)at org.jivesoftware.openfire.filetransfer.proxy.ProxyConnectionManager.access$100( ProxyConnectionManager.java:39)at org.jivesoftware.openfire.filetransfer.proxy.ProxyConnectionManager$1$1.run(Pro xyConnectionManager.java:107)at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Unknown Source)at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(Unknown Source)at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(Unknown Source)at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(Unknown Source)at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown Source)at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)2. If I''m running Openfire on a different machine than the client, I get all -1s back in response to my command and Openfire reports an IOException: "Error reading Socks5 version and command".Anybody have any s
strange SOCKS error code when connecting to a hidden service using the wrong port Reported by: ultramage Owned by: rransom Priority: Low Milestone: Tor: unspecified Component: Core Tor/Tor Version: 0.2.2.7-alpha Severity: Keywords: tor-hs Cc: ultramage, nickm, Sebastian Actual Points: Parent ID: Points: Reviewer: Sponsor: Description (last modified by nickm) I set up two distinct hidden services, HTTP(80) and SSH(22) on my machine (since I didn't know you could put multiple records under a single service). Today I made the mistake of connecting to the HTTP service using port 22 (took the HTTP service's url, stripped the http part, entered into PuTTY). The returned error code was 0x02 = connection not allowed by ruleset. This https://community.igniterealtime.org/thread/28006 message made me very confused, since it somehow implies that my SOCKS settings were somehow blocking the connection. But that was not the case. What happened on the TOR back-end was, my request got received, the remote TOR server found that my port was not on the list of ports associated with that particular onion hostname, and rejected the connection attempt. Finally, my TOR client, trying to be as clever https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/1250 as informative as possible, returned that specific error code. While the error code does in some sense describe what happened internally, I do not think that 0x02 is appropriate for this scenario. I did not study the SOCKS specification, however I'm assuming that "ruleset" refers to the access control rules implemented on the daemon that's providing the tunnel, and not on the remote endpoint (the target machine is oblivious to SOCKS and just sees an incoming TCP connection, so it can't react in any way). My proposal is to change this error code to reduce confusion and help users identify the cause of the problem (between keyboard and chair in my case :). Which one to use? I suggest 0x05 = connection refused by destination host. "Connection refused" is what you normally get if the destination machine has nothing running on the requested port (and there's no firewall to hide that). Visualize a single hidden service as a physical machine running somewhere on the internet, with stuff listening only on ports associated with that HS. In that case, connecting to a wrong port would give TCP "connection refused". And TOR hidden service isolation seems to be making virtual servers like this. So why shouldn't it be re
situation (say at work using windows) where you would like to connect to a machine over ssh (say at home using Linux/UNIX) but it's not possible because of firewall rules? https://meinit.nl/using-putty-and-an-http-proxy-to-ssh-anywhere-through-firewalls There might be an http-proxy server available that you could use. Be aware that applying this trick might be technically possible but not permitted. Probably best to discuss it with someone in your https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SOCKS organization first. Here are the ingredients: A windows machine to be used as a client. A Linux/UNIX machine to be used as an ssh server. Get Putty or Portable Putty to your client. connection not Find out what http proxy your organization is using on your client. Configure Putty to use that proxy on your client. Finding out what proxy your organization uses. There are a few options, going from easy to difficult, you don't have to do each, just one. See what works for you. Open Internet Explorer, click Tools Internet Options.... Go to the tab Connections and click LAN Settings.... connection not allowed In the Proxy server. area, you will find the proxy server and the port. If not; continue and try the next trick. On your windows machine, open a good website and click Start or whatever, then Run... and enter cmd. You will be presented with a crippled terminal. Type netstat -an and search for ESTABLISHED and 8080 or 3128 on one line, the IP can be found in the third column. Mine looks like this: TCP 192.168.1.2:2210 192.168.1.1:3128 ESTABLISHED. The 192.168.1.1 is my proxy server, 3128 the port. Configuring Putty to use a proxy. Now that you have the proxy server and the port, lets configure Putty. Open Putty and enter the Host Name where you would like to connect to. Open the plus before Connections and select Proxy. Enter the Proxy hostname and Port. Now select Open. You should be presented with a password challenge. Congratulations, you are connected! Articles Robert de Bock Add new comment Nederlands Comments Sat, 01/03/2015 - 20:41 — Anonymous (not verified) If this works, your proxy If this works, your proxy security is subpar. reply Thu, 11/06/2014 - 10:51 — madvent (not verified) Thanks for the netstat Thanks for the netsta
NNTP NTP POP ONC/RPC RTP RTSP RIP SIP SMTP SNMP SSH Telnet TLS/SSL XMPP more... Transport layer TCP UDP DCCP SCTP RSVP more... Internet layer IP IPv4 IPv6 ICMP ICMPv6 ECN IGMP IPsec more... Link layer ARP NDP OSPF Tunnels L2TP PPP MAC Ethernet DSL ISDN FDDI more... v t e Socket Secure (SOCKS) is an Internet protocol that exchanges network packets between a client and server through a proxy server. SOCKS5 additionally provides authentication so only authorized users may access a server. Practically, a SOCKS server proxies TCP connections to an arbitrary IP address, and provides a means for UDP packets to be forwarded. SOCKS performs at Layer 5 of the OSI model (the session layer, an intermediate layer between the presentation layer and the transport layer). Contents 1 History 2 Usage 3 Comparison to HTTP proxying 3.1 SOCKS 3.2 HTTP 4 Protocol 4.1 SOCKS4 4.2 SOCKS4a 4.3 SOCKS5 5 Software 5.1 Servers 5.1.1 SOCKS proxy server implementations 5.1.2 Other programs providing SOCKS server interface 5.2 Clients 5.2.1 Proxifiers 5.2.1.1 Translating proxies 6 References 7 External links History[edit] The protocol was originally developed/designed by David Koblas, a system administrator of MIPS Computer Systems. After MIPS was taken over by Silicon Graphics in 1992, Koblas presented a paper on SOCKS at that year's Usenix Security Symposium, making SOCKS publicly available.[1] The protocol was extended to version 4 by Ying-Da Lee of NEC. The SOCKS reference architecture and client are owned by Permeo Technologies,[2] a spin-off from NEC. (Blue Coat Systems bought out Permeo Technologies.) The SOCKS5 protocol was originally a security protocol that made firewalls and other security products easier to administer.[citation needed] It was approved by the IETF in 1996.[3] The protocol was developed in collaboration with Aventail Corporation, which markets the technology outside of Asia.[4] Usage[edit] SOCKS is a de facto standard for circuit-level gateways.[citation needed] Another use of SOCKS is as a circumvention tool, allowing traffic to bypass Internet filtering to access content otherwise blocked, e.g., by governments, workplaces, schools, and country-specific web services.[5] Some SSH suites, such as OpenSSH, support dynamic port forwarding that allows the user to create a local SOCKS proxy.[6] This can free the use