Error Definition Of Implicitly-declared
Contents |
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of
Error Definition Of Implicitly-declared Constructor
this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business error definition of implicitly-declared c++ Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask error definition of implicitly-declared ‘constexpr Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign
Error Definition Of Implicitly-declared Destructor
up C++ compiler error definition of implicitly declared up vote 0 down vote favorite Hello everyone having anissue with my code today. I have created a program calculating area of square circle and rectangle. With a base class of shape. Where the UML has shape as the abstract class with public area():double, getName():string,and getDimensions:string, rectangle derived from shape with protected height, and width,
C++ Definition Of Implicitly-declared
and a public rectangle(h:double, w:double), followed by a derived square from rectangle with just a public square(h:double), and finally a circle derived from shape with a private radius, and a public circle(r:double). So far have gotten far in my code yet in my shape.cpp file am getting an error on line 10 that says shape.cpp:10: error: definition of implicitly-declared 'constexpr shape::shape()' shape::shape() here is a link to my complete code: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/0eedd7719a34655488fb shape.cpp file: #include "shape.h" #include "circle.h" #include "rectangle.h" #include "square.h" #include
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you error definition of implicitly declared copy constructor might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site
Error Definition Of Implicitly Declared Default Constructor
About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or definition of implicitly declared copy assignment operator posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27414005/c-compiler-error-definition-of-implicitly-declared 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up C++ compiler error definition of implicitly declared up vote 0 down vote favorite Hello everyone having anissue with my code today. I have created a program calculating area of square circle and rectangle. With a base http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27414005/c-compiler-error-definition-of-implicitly-declared class of shape. Where the UML has shape as the abstract class with public area():double, getName():string,and getDimensions:string, rectangle derived from shape with protected height, and width, and a public rectangle(h:double, w:double), followed by a derived square from rectangle with just a public square(h:double), and finally a circle derived from shape with a private radius, and a public circle(r:double). So far have gotten far in my code yet in my shape.cpp file am getting an error on line 10 that says shape.cpp:10: error: definition of implicitly-declared 'constexpr shape::shape()' shape::shape() here is a link to my complete code: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/0eedd7719a34655488fb shape.cpp file: #include "shape.h" #include "circle.h" #include "rectangle.h" #include "square.h" #include
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the http://stackoverflow.com/questions/708008/c-compiling-error-related-to-constructor-destructor-definition company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 http://www.cplusplus.com/forum/beginner/78166/ million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up c++ compiling error related to constructor/destructor definition up vote 16 down vote favorite 4 I'm trying to define the definition of constructor and destructor of my class but I keep getting the error: definition of implicitly-declared 'x::x()' What does it mean? Part of the code: ///Constructor StackInt::StackInt(){ t = (-1); stackArray = new int[20]; }; ///Destructor StackInt::~StackInt(){ delete[] stackArray; } c++ constructor destructor share|improve this question edited Mar 1 '13 at 15:48 Drew Noakes 127k73394489 asked Apr 2 '09 at 1:53 caesar 1 Post your code ! –Uri Apr 2 '09 at 1:54 definition of implicitly How are your files structured (*.h, *.cpp)? Which file is that posted code in? –paxdiablo Apr 2 '09 at 2:02 add a comment| 2 Answers 2 active oldest votes up vote 40 down vote In the class declaration (probably in a header file) you need to have something that looks like: class StackInt { public: StackInt(); ~StackInt(); } To let the compiler know you don't want the default compiler-generated versions (since you're providing them). There will probably be more to the declaration than that, but you'll need at least those - and this will get you started. You can see this by using the very simple: class X { public: X(); // <- remove this. }; X::X() {}; int main (void) { X x ; return 0; } Compile that and it works. Then remove the line with the comment marker and compile again. You'll see your problems appear then: class X {}; X::X() {}; int main (void) { X x ; return 0; }
qq.cpp:2: error: definition of implicitly-declared `X::X()'share|improve this answer edited Apr 2 '09 at 2:31 paxdiablo 489k1179701419 answered Apr 2 '09 at 2:03 Michael Burr 240k30353574 Thank you. This was exactly the problem. –caesar Apr 2 '09 at 2:11 @MB, I was work
X f() {return X();} void g1(X&) {} void g2(const X&) {} int main() { // g1(f()); Error:Invalid initialiazation of non-const reference of type 'X&' from a temporary of type 'X' g2(f()); } I thought that the compiler Would give me an error as there is no constructor X() declared or defined. But there were no errors.Can someone please explain this to me. Thank You for reading. Last edited on Aug 31, 2012 at 8:09am UTC Aug 31, 2012 at 8:33am UTC vlad from moscow (6539) If no constructor is declared for a class then the compiler declares the default constructor implicitly. If it is used in the code then the compiler also defines this default constructor. For your class the compiler implicitly declares the following functions: default constructor, copy constructor, move constructor, destructor, copy assignment operator, move assignment operator From the c++ Standard 12 Special member functions 1 The default constructor (12.1), copy constructor and copy assignment operator (12.8), move constructor and move assignment operator (12.8), and destructor (12.4) are special member functions. [ Note: The implementation will implicitly declare these member functions for some class types when the program does not explicitly declare them. The implementation will implicitly define them if they are odr-used (3.2). See 12.1, 12.4 and 12.8. —end note ] Programs shall not define implicitly-declared special member functions. Last edited on Aug 31, 2012 at 8:48am UTC Topic archived. No new replies allowed. C++ Information Tutorials Reference Articles Forum Forum BeginnersWindows ProgrammingUNIX/Linux ProgrammingGeneral C++ ProgrammingLoungeJobs Home page | Privacy policy© cplusplus.com, 2000-2016 - All rights reserved - v3.1Spotted an error? contact us