Error 2005 Mapping Association Is Redundant
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Warnings in edmx file when upgrading from 3.5 to 4 up vote 4 down vote favorite I updated my solution from .NET 3.5 to 4.0, and thanks god, I just had to fix minor things. But what I don't understand is, the edmx file generated many warnings like this: Error 2005: Mapping Association 'FK_CP_C' is redundant: Its referential integrity constraint provides sufficient information. You can safely delete the mapping information for this association. Have you ever encountered this? Should I do take the risk and delete the associations? I tried to google it but wasn't able to find anything. Thanks .net-4.0 entity-framework-4 .net-3.5 migration edmx share|improve this question edited Dec 23 '15 at 13:51 Sami Kuhmonen 13.5k71735 asked Jul 6 '10 at 14:12 Shimmy 36.2k76276462 add a comment| 1 Answer 1 active oldest votes up vote 3 down vote accepted Well FYI I made a backup of the project before, removed those associations thoat reported an error, updated the model, and the warnings are gone. I missed to notice what kind of associations caused the warnings. Hope this might help someone in the future. share|improve this answer answered Jul 6 '10 at 14:32 Shimmy 36.2k76276462 1 Thanks for answering your own question, it was helpful to me. –Aaron D Jun 5 '12 at 20:00 Glad it helped, thanks for your input man!! –Shimmy Jun 6 '12 at 1:47 add a comment| Your Answer draft saved draft discarded Sign up or log in Sign up using Google Sign up using Facebook Sign up using Email and Password Post as a guest Name Ema
ASP.NET Community Standup Forums Help Home/ASP.NET Forums/Data Access/ADO.NET, Entity Framework, LINQ to SQL, NHibernate/Problem with EntityFramework after upgrading to .NET 4 Problem with EntityFramework after upgrading to .NET 4 [Answered]RSS 1 reply Last post Jun 30, 2011 08:40 PM by tomas_cermak ‹ Previous Thread|Next Thread › Print Share Twitter Facebook Email Shortcuts Active Threads Unanswered Threads Unresolved Threads Support Options Advanced Search Reply tomas_cermak None 0 Points 8 Posts Problem with EntityFramework http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3186961/warnings-in-edmx-file-when-upgrading-from-3-5-to-4 after upgrading to .NET 4 Jun 30, 2011 03:03 AM|tomas_cermak|LINK Hi, after upgrading my web site from ver. 3.5 to ver. 4, my entity data model shows next errors (about 5). Warning 22 Error 2005: Mapping Association 'FK_EducationLevelIndex_Translation' is redundant: Its referential integrity constraint provides sufficient information. You can safely delete the mapping information http://forums.asp.net/t/1695328.aspx?Problem+with+EntityFramework+after+upgrading+to+NET+4 for this association. D:\Data\Visual Studio 2010\Projects\SdbDataModel\SdbDataModel\Base.edmx 6305 21 SdbModel Can I really delete this association? If I delete this, how I will be able to reach connected entities? I found on internet 2 "solutions". One user deleted the associations and all was OK. Second says it`s MS warning message in XAML file and nothing can be done about it. Who is right? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Also one of my VB.NET code shows the next: The value of a property that is part of an object's key does not match the corresponding property value stored in the ObjectContext. This can occur if properties that are part of the key return inconsistent or incorrect values or if DetectChanges is not called after changes are made to a property that is part of the key. This worked under ver. 3.5. The error above shows on DataBind() command in the following code, only when the language code parameter "ln" is present, e.g. ?ln=en: ProtectedSubPage_Load(ByValsenderAsObject,ByValeAsSystem.EventArgs)HandlesMe.Load DimLangColNameAsString="" Page.T
Reply | Threaded Open this post in threaded view ♦ ♦ | Report Content as Inappropriate ♦ ♦ Compiling System.Data.SQLite with latest sqlite3.dll I am trying to figure out how to compile System.Data.SQLite and in the process update sqlite from 3.7.12.1 to http://sqlite.1065341.n5.nabble.com/Compiling-System-Data-SQLite-with-latest-sqlite3-dll-td63465.html 3.7.13 as I need the shared cache option for memory connections. And when I write 'trying' I am having trouble figuring out where exactly System.Data.SQLite picks up sqlite3.dll from. The source code doesn't include it and http://bmcproc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1753-6561-1-S1-S27 the installer also doesn't include it, but it must be somewhere. Is it even safe to update System.Data.SQLite 1.0.81.0 with sqlite3.dll 3.7.13 and will the shared cache feature work? Also, compiling System.Data.SQLite for .NET 4.0 error 2005 results in some warnings/errors. Are they safe to ignore? Warning 1 The parent file, 'SR.resx', for file 'SR.Designer.cs' cannot be found in the project file. System.Data.SQLite.2010 Warning 2 Load of property 'OutputType' failed. error 2005 mapping System.Data.SQLite.Module.2010 Warning 3 The parent file, 'SR.resx', for file 'SR.Designer.cs' cannot be found in the project file. System.Data.SQLite.Module.2010 Warning 4 Error 2005: Mapping Association 'FK_InternationalOrders_OrderID_OrderID' is redundant: Its referential integrity constraint provides sufficient information. You can safely delete the mapping information for this association. C:\Users\bme\Documents\Visual Studio 2010\Projects\sqlite-netFx-source-1.0.81.0\testlinq\NorthwindModel2010.edmx 793 800 testlinq.2010 Warning 5 Error 2005: Mapping Association 'FK_OrderDetails_OrderID_OrderID' is redundant: Its referential integrity constraint provides sufficient information. You can safely delete the mapping information for this association. C:\Users\bme\Documents\Visual Studio 2010\Projects\sqlite-netFx-source-1.0.81.0\testlinq\NorthwindModel2010.edmx 801 809 testlinq.2010 Warning 6 Error 2005: Mapping Association 'FK_OrderDetails_ProductID_ProductID' is redundant: Its referential integrity constraint provides sufficient information. You can safely delete the mapping information for this association. C:\Users\bme\
Genetic Analysis Workshop 15: Gene Expression Analysis and Approaches to Detecting Multiple Functional Loci Proceedings Open Access Density-based clustering in haplotype analysis for association mappingRobertPIgoJr1, DouglasLondono1, KatherineMiller2, AntonioRParrado1, ShannonREQuade1, MoumitaSinha3, SulgiKim1, SunghoWon1, JingLi4 and KatrinaABGoddard1, 5Email authorBMC Proceedings20071(Suppl 1):S27DOI: 10.1186/1753-6561-1-S1-S27© Igo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.2007Published: 18December2007 AbstractClustering of related haplotypes in haplotype-based association mapping has the potential to improve power by reducing the degrees of freedom without sacrificing important information about the underlying genetic structure. We have modified a generalized linear model approach for association analysis by incorporating a density-based clustering algorithm to reduce the number of coefficients in the model. Using the GAW 15 Problem 3 simulated data, we show that our novel method can substantially enhance power to detect association with the binary rheumatoid arthritis (RA) phenotype at the HLA-DRB1 locus on chromosome 6. In contrast, clustering did not appreciably improve performance at locus D, perhaps a consequence of a rare susceptibility allele and of the overwhelming effect of HLA-DRB1/locus C, 5 cM distal. Optimization of parameters governing the clustering algorithm identified a set of parameters that delivered nearly ideal performance in a variety of situations. The cluster-based score test was valid over a wide range of haplotype diversity, and was robust to severe departures from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium encountered near HLA-DRB1 in RA case-control samples. BackgroundHaplotypes generally contain more information than individual single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) about the underlying genetic architecture, and therefore offer greater power to detect association between markers and traits. However, the power of haplotype-based methods for association mapping, like