Error Handling In C Best Practices
Contents |
handling in C Posted on January 16, 2010 by rlc One of the things I do as a analyst-programmer is write software - that would be the "programmer" part. I usually do that in C++ but, sometimes, when the c exception handling best practices facilities of C++ aren't available (e.g. no exception handling and no RTTI) C
C Error Handling Techniques
becomes a more obvious choice. When that happens, RTTI is not the thing I miss the most - you can get
Objective C Error Handling Best Practices
around that using magic numbers if you need to. Exceptions, on the other hand, become a very painful absence when you're used to using them. Error handling is a very important part of programming:
Python Error Handling Best Practices
a lot of things can go wrong when a program runs and most of those things need to be handled properly because the functionalities of your program depend on them. C++ uses exceptions for this purpose, so that if a call to foo fails, you don't have to handle that failure in the context of your call - especially if you wouldn't be able to do anything about it ssis error handling best practices anyway. Thus, the following code: foo(); bar(); will call bar only if foo didn't throw any exceptions. Presumably both do something useful and neither of them return anything useful. Now, the same thing would be true in C if we did something like this: int result = foo(); if (result == 0) result = bar(); Now, both foo and bar return a result code which, in this case, is 0 if all is well. Windows programmers will be more familiar with this: HRESULT result = foo(); if (SUCCEEDED(result)) result = bar(); which amounts to the same thing. HRESULT, after all, is a 32-bit unsigned integer of which a few bits are reserved to indicate where the error originated and the other bits indicate the error. An HRESULT value of 0 means no error, so the SUCCEEDED basically checks whether the result is 0. The trouble starts when the function returned an integer already - e.g. a getFooCount function: unsigned int foo_count(getFooCount()); foo(foo_count); In this code, foo only gets called when getFooCount returns a valid value - which is the function's post-condition, so it would have thrown an exception otherwise. There are two different ways to port this to C: unsigned int foo_count = ge
C - Basic Syntax C - Data Types C - Variables C - Constants C - Storage Classes C - Operators C - Decision Making C - Loops C - Functions C - Scope Rules C - Arrays C - Pointers C - angularjs error handling best practices Strings C - Structures C - Unions C - Bit Fields C - Typedef C - javascript error handling best practices Input & Output C - File I/O C - Preprocessors C - Header Files C - Type Casting C - Error Handling C - java error handling best practices Recursion C - Variable Arguments C - Memory Management C - Command Line Arguments C Programming Resources C - Questions & Answers C - Quick Guide C - Useful Resources C - Discussion Selected Reading Developer's Best Practices Questions and http://rlc.vlinder.ca/blog/2010/01/error-handling-in-c/ Answers Effective Resume Writing HR Interview Questions Computer Glossary Who is Who C - Error Handling Advertisements Previous Page Next Page As such, C programming does not provide direct support for error handling but being a system programming language, it provides you access at lower level in the form of return values. Most of the C or even Unix function calls return -1 or NULL in case of any error and set an error code errno. It is set https://www.tutorialspoint.com/cprogramming/c_error_handling.htm as a global variable and indicates an error occurred during any function call. You can find various error codes defined in
program comes out of an error condition gracefully. On encountering an error a program must rollback and free-up various resources allocated during the course of execution. Ideally, the program should get back to a state where it was consistent before the error happened. Why error http://blog.staila.com/?p=114 handling is important? Absence of error handling or a buggy error handling can lead a program or https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/C_Programming/Error_handling the system as whole to an inconsistent state. Often many fatal programming bugs such as memory leaks, dead locks, data race conditions etc. are the results of an improper error handling. Especially in a programming environment where resources are scarce and margin of error is thin adapting to a good error handling technique becomes even more important. Common error handling techniques There are mainly two techniques used error handling by professional C programmers to handle errors. The first one is where a program on encountering an error un-dos the changes and returns from the same code location. As a sample following is a C function that inserts some string in a linked list node if the string is already not present. It returns pointer to head of the linked list in case of success or NULL otherwise. Notice the error handling technique used in the program. struct lnode { char *str; struct lnode *next; }; handling best practices struct lnode *insert(char *data, int len, struct lnode *list) { struct lnode *p, *q; p = (struct lnode *)malloc(sizeof(struct lnode)); if ( NULL == p ) { return NULL; } p->str = (char *)malloc(sizeof(char)*len); if ( NULL == p->str ) { // free node before returning. free ( p ); return NULL; } memcpy ( p->str, data, len ); if(NULL == list) { p->next = NULL; list = p; } else { q = list; while(q->next != NULL) { // check for duplicates if (0 == strcmp(q->str,p->str)) { // free string and node free(p->str); free(p); return NULL; } q = q->next; } p->next = q->next; q->next = p; } return list; } In this case error is handled by freeing up memory allocated so far and returning from the same place. It is a very simple way of handling error gracefully but it has several demerits. It makes the function look complicated as it has multiple exit points (return statements). In this approach if the error handling part of the code grows large then the code can become really unmanageable. Thus such a technique of error handling can be used, at the most, only in functions which are quite small in size. The second type of error handling technique, which is very popular among Linux Kernel developers, is implemented by using C statement goto. In case of an error the program control jumps to a suitable error handling block of the function, does necessary cleanup and returns from there. The same list
known as exception handling). By convention, the programmer is expected to prevent errors from occurring in the first place, and test return values from functions. For example, -1 and NULL are used in several functions such as socket() (Unix socket programming) or malloc() respectively to indicate problems that the programmer should be aware about. In a worst case scenario where there is an unavoidable error and no way to recover from it, a C programmer usually tries to log the error and "gracefully" terminate the program. There is an external variable called "errno", accessible by the programs after including