Error Handling In C Linux
Contents |
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about linux script error handling Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with
Linux Bash Error Handling
us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is linux kernel error handling a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Error handling in C code up vote 102 down vote favorite 59 What do linux shell error handling you consider "best practice" when it comes to error handling errors in a consistent way in a C library. There are two ways I've been thinking of: Always return error code. A typical function would look like this: MYAPI_ERROR getObjectSize(MYAPIHandle h, int* returnedSize); The always provide an error pointer approach: int getObjectSize(MYAPIHandle h, MYAPI_ERROR* returnedError); When using the first approach it's possible to write code like this where the error
File Handling In C Linux
handling check is directly placed on the function call: int size; if(getObjectSize(h, &size) != MYAPI_SUCCESS) { // Error handling } Which looks better than the error handling code here. MYAPIError error; int size; size = getObjectSize(h, &error); if(error != MYAPI_SUCCESS) { // Error handling } However, I think using the return value for returning data makes the code more readable, It's obvious that something was written to the size variable in the second example. Do you have any ideas on why I should prefer any of those approaches or perhaps mix them or use something else? I'm not a fan of global error states since it tends to make multi threaded use of the library way more painful. EDIT: C++ specific ideas on this would also be interesting to hear about as long as they are not involving exceptions since it's not an option for me at the moment... c error-handling share|improve this question edited Nov 6 '13 at 19:09 ubershmekel 3,64013145 asked Dec 22 '08 at 10:46 Laserallan 6,71172956 add a comment| 17 Answers 17 active oldest votes up vote 50 down vote accepted I like the error as return-value way. If you're designing the api and you want to make use of your library as painless
there are ways to do error handling. Of course the programmer needs to prevent errors during coding and should always test the return values of signal handling in c linux functions called by the program. A lot of C function calls return a exception handling in linux -1 or NULL in case of an error, so quick test on these return values are easily done with
Error Handling Functions In C
for instance an ‘if statement’. In previous tutorials we already mention that this behavior (returning numbers to indicate an error) is also used in Unix or Linux like operating systems. For http://stackoverflow.com/questions/385975/error-handling-in-c-code instance if a program successful ends the return value of the program is zero. If the program ends with an error usually a number larger than zero is returned (for example 1). (With command ‘echo $?’ on the command line you can display the return code of a program that has previously run). So the one thing you need to remember is that you https://www.codingunit.com/c-tutorial-error-handling-exception-handling (the programmer) are responsible for error handling. You’re the person that needs to make sure that a program will gracefully terminate and not just CRASH unexpectedly! It is you that need to take appropriate action depending on the return values of function calls. Global Variable errno The global variable errno is used by C functions and this integer is set if there is an error during the function call. To make use of errno you need to include errno.h and you need to call ‘extern int errno;’ Let us take a look at an example: #include
single target inside a function) is just perfect for C error handling code. Don't be misguided by a silly principle of https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3883310 goto's being always bad. They get the job done in the cleanest possible way, so you should use them for doing cleanups.The examples did not have any resources to clean up, and that http://www.thegeekstuff.com/2010/10/linux-error-codes is what makes error handling in C painful. In the absence of any cleanup routines, this will do: return ( do_something() == SUCCESS && do_something_else() == SUCCESS && do_final_thing() == SUCCESS) ? SUCCESS error handling : FAILURE; Of course, once you add resources to clean up or error codes that are meaningful (not just success/fail) error handling gets more painful.You should not try to perfect something as mundane as error handling. Just write the damn code and get over it. tspiteri 1631 days ago Why should the goto be to one single target? Multiple goto statements are good for multiple clean handling in c ups without adding indentation levels and without having artificially long logic ands. For example: int init_abc() { if (!init_a()) goto err_a; if (!init_b()) goto err_b; if (!init_c()) goto err_c; return 1; err_c: cleanup_b(); err_b: cleanup_a(); err_a: return 0; } seems to be the cleanest way to do what it does in C. For what it's worth, it is the way a lot of error handling is done in the Linux kernel. exDM69 1631 days ago I guess it's fine to use multiple targets too. However, usually you can get away with one, because free(NULL) and similar cleanups tend to be no-ops. So you have something like: char *foo = 0, *bar = 0; if((foo = malloc(X)) == NULL || (bar = malloc(Y)) == NULL) goto cleanup; make_me_millions(foo, bar); cleanup: free(bar); free(foo); In this case, and many cases like it, there's no need to have two jump targets, because one is good enough. You'll have to declare the variables early on anyway to avoid warnings/errors from definitions that cross jump labels.So there's probably nothing wrong with multiple jump targets but that might not be needed with well-behaving cleanup functions. adestefan 1631 days ago because free(NULL) and s
In C programming language, there is no direct support for error handling. You have to detect the failure and handle the error. In C programming language, return values represents success or failure. Inside a C program, when a function fails, you should handle the errors accordingly, or at least record the errors in a log file. When you are running some program on Linux environment, you might notice that it gives some error number. For example, "Error no is : 17", which doesn't really say much. You really need to know what error number 17 means. This article shows all available error numbers along with it descriptions. This article might be a handy reference for you, when you encounter an error number and you would like to know what it means. In C programming language, there is an external variable called "errno". From this errno variable you can use some error handling functions to find out the error description and handle it appropriately. You have to include errno.h header file to use external variable errno. perror function prints error description in standard error. The strerror function returns a string describing the error code passed in the argument errnum. The following C code snippet tries to open a file through open system call. There are two flags in the open call. O_CREAT flag is to create a file, if the file does not exist. O_EXCL flag is used with O_CREAT, if the file is already exist open call will fail with the proper error number. $ cat fileopen.c #include