Error Handling In Performance Testing
Contents |
must be inserted into the scripts to verify the application being tested with the load. Verification function that are error handling testing definition used in our application are: Web_reg_find, web_reg_save_param These verification should error handling in software testing be outside towards the end of the transaction. Mandatory verification points: ■ Login - java exception handling performance whenever there is a login, verification points must be added to verify that the user logged in correctly. ■ Update Transactions - transactions c++ exception handling performance that update the database must be verified that they are successful. ■ Each page should be verified using Web_reg_find function Using Web_reg_find for verifications. Example: web_reg_find("Text= Main Package","SaveCount=Verify_Count1",LAST); Verification: if (strcmp(lr_eval_string("{Verify_Count1}"),"0")==0) { lr_end_transaction("AddMainPackage", LR_FAIL); lr_error_message("Iter %s: Add Main Package for Customer '%s' & UserName '%s' Failed!", lr_eval_string("{Iter}"), lr_eval_string("{CustomerName}"),
Jquery Load Error Handling
lr_eval_string("{LoginID}")); return 0; } Else { lr_output_message("Iter %s: Add Main Package for Customer '%s' & UserName '%s' Succeded!", lr_eval_string("{Iter}"), lr_eval_string("{CustomerName}"), lr_eval_string("{LoginID}")); } Using Web_reg_save_param for verifications. Example: web_reg_save_param("OrdersJan", "LB=OrdersJan:", "RB=\"", "NotFound=EMPTY", LAST); web_reg_save_param("OfferNode", "LB=type=\"checkbox\" value=\" OfferJan:", "RB=\"/>", "NotFound=EMPTY", LAST); Verification: if ((strcmp(lr_eval_string("{OrdersJan}"),"")==0)|| (strcmp(lr_eval_string("{OfferJan}"),"")==0)){ lr_end_transaction("NewConnect", LR_FAIL); lr_error_message("Iter %s: Select New order Customer '%s' & UserName '%s' Failed!", lr_eval_string("{Iter}"), lr_eval_string("{CustomerName}"), lr_eval_string("{LoginID}")); return 0; } Else { lr_output_message("Iter %s: Select New order Customer '%s' & UserName '%s' Succeded!", lr_eval_string("{Iter}"), lr_eval_string("{CustomerName}"), lr_eval_string("{LoginID}")); } ■ The verification should provide as much info on the problem accrued, for example printing the user details, order number that failed. lr_error_message("Order Failed with User : %s ",lr_eval_string("{CurrUserID}")); ■ A transaction must be ended by strictly specifying success or failure (LR_PASS, or LR_FAIL). Automatic d
are here: One Stop Software Testing » Basic Concepts, Testing Techniques » Error Handling Testing Techniques Follow @testingconcepts Error Handling Testing Techniques Sponsored Links:
Error Handling Testing In Software Testing
================================================================ Share this Post: The main objective of the Error handling what is error handling testing techniques is to ensure that the applications are capable to handling incorrect Transactions. The application is smart error handling java enough to identify the incorrect transactions and approximate decision need to take and intimate the end user. Normal testing is basically test the application is working properly as per http://nonfunctionaltestingtools.blogspot.com/2015/01/verifications-and-error-handling-in.html the requirements but error handling testing is exactly the opposite manner. Error handling testing is basically done by Experience persons who had the full knowledge of the domain. Error handling testing can generate in such that the improper transactions is done in-between the proper transactions and check how the system is behaved during improper transactions and identify the problems. http://www.onestopsoftwaretesting.com/error-handling-testing-techniques/ Use the improper master data and check the application whether it is capable to identify the problem and informed to the Users. Leave a Reply: Or Reply with below details Click here to cancel reply. Name (required) E-Mail (will not be published) (required) Website «Learn LoadRunner, Tutorials and Guide for Beginners Desk Checking and Peer Reviews in Software Development» Related Articles From This Category Types of Performance Testing - Revisted Posted On Tuesday, March 31st 2015 During Interviews, I have come across many candidates who mentioned that they have performance testing ... Software Compatibility Testing Posted On Saturday, August 24th 2013 Compatibility: What dictionary says about Compatibility: Ability of the things to live/exist together without problems. How should ... Introduction and Importance of Software Testing in SDLC Posted On Friday, March 9th 2012 (An Article for beginners and fresher testers) Introduction of Software Testing The Software Testing really plays a ... Challenges for a Software Tester | Challenges in Software Testing Posted On Sunday, January 29th 2012 (An Article for beginners and fresher testers) Software testing h
between Automated and manual systems. " Manual System: can deal with problems as they occur. " Automated Systems: Must pre program error handling. http://sqa.fyicenter.com/FAQ/Software-Testing-Methodolog/_Error_Handling_Testing_Technique_.html Usage " It determines the ability of applications system to process http://performancetestingissues.blogspot.com/2016/01/how-to-verify-page-content-in-loadunner.html the incorrect transactions properly " Errors encompass all unexpected conditions. " In some system approx. 50% of programming effort will be devoted to handling error condition. Objectives " Determine: " Application system recognizes all expected error conditions. " Accountability of processing errors has been assigned error handling and procedures provide a high probability that errors will be properly corrected. " During correction process reasonable control is maintained over errors. How to Use " A group of knowledgeable people is required to anticipate what can go wrong in the application system. " It is needed that all the application knowledgeable people assemble to error handling in integrate their knowledge of user area, auditing and error tracking. " Then logical test error conditions should be created based on this assimilated information. " The error handling testing technique should test - Error Processing of error Control condition Reentry of condition is proper or not. " The iterative process should be used where first the errors in the system trapped should be corrected and then the corrected system should be re-tested to check the authenticity of application operation and to complete the error handling testing cycle. " Tester should think negatively to trap errors. " Testers should determine how the system should fail so that they can test to determine if the software can properly process the erroneous data. When to use " Throughout SDLC " Impact from errors should be identified and should be corrected to reduce the errors to acceptable level. " Used to assist in error management process of system development and maintenance. Examples " Create a set of erroneous transacti
mouse clicks or synchronized mouse clicks may not work properly and hence the image check might fail. Here is the simple logic for error handling intimgchk,i; charbuffer[50]; i=0;do{ sprintf(buffer,"01_Transaction_%d",i); lr_start_transaction(buffer); //Perform a mouse click rdp_mouse_click("StepDescription=Mouse Click", "Snapshot=snapshot_87.inf", "MouseX=50", "MouseY=463", "MouseButton=LEFT_BUTTON", "Origin=Default", RDP_LAST); //imgchk returns "0" on success imgchk=rdp_sync_on_image("StepDescription=Image Synchronization", "WaitFor=Appear", "AddOffsetToInput=Default", IMAGEDATA, "ImageLeft=215","ImageTop=71","ImageWidth=107","ImageHeight=23","ImageName=snapshot_88.png",ENDIMAGE, RDP_LAST); if(imgchk==0) { lr_output_message("image check successful"); lr_set_transaction_status(LR_PASS); lr_end_transaction(buffer,LR_AUTO); } //If image check fails, do one more click else { i++; lr_output_message("execute mouse click one more time and increment i val"); } //Trying for a maximum of 3 times and then exiting the current iteration if(i>=2) { lr_output_message("Mouse click tried for 3 times and didn't work"); lr_exit(LR_EXIT_ITERATION_AND_CONTINUE,LR_FAIL); } }while(imgchk!=0&&i<=2); Posted by Suma latha at 03:42 Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest 2 comments: shilpa8 January 2016 at 00:42Very usefull infoReplyDeleteNaganagouda B.A18 February 2016 at 01:47Thanks Suma Very Useful infoReplyDeleteAdd commentLoad more... Newer Post Older Post Home Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom) About Me Suma latha View my complete profile Performance Testing ▼ 2016 (6) ► April (1) ▼ January (5) Difference Between WinInet Level Replay and Socket... How to verify the file download in Load runner RDP... How to handle dynamic popup windows in RDP scripts... Error handling in load runner RDP scripts Loadrunner RDP scripts Best Practices Simple template. Powered by Blogger.