Ms Sql 2000 Catch Error
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about error handling in sql server 2000 stored procedures hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges sql server 2000 error handling Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 6.2 million programmers, just like you, helping each sql server stored procedure error handling best practices other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Try Catch in SQL Server 2000? up vote 5 down vote favorite 2 Is it possible using Try-Catch in SQL Server 2000? sql sql-server try-catch sql-server-2000 share|improve this question xact_abort edited Oct 22 '14 at 7:32 bummi 22.7k83463 asked Dec 24 '10 at 6:12 Soner Gönül 69.8k22110200 4 No. Only in 2005 and 2008, 2008 R2. –Sergey Akopov Dec 24 '10 at 6:15 add a comment| 5 Answers 5 active oldest votes up vote 9 down vote accepted No, it is not possible. This was only from Sql Server 2005 Check TRY...CATCH (Transact-SQL) and check the Other Versions share|improve this answer answered Dec 24 '10 at 6:16 Adriaan Stander 107k11180220 add a comment| up vote 6 down vote No. Try Catch block was introduced in SQL SERVER 2005. Following article shows how you can use @@ERROR to check for errors. Understanding error handling in SQL Server 2000 share|improve this answer edited Aug 20 '15 at 4:42 Community♦ 11 answered Dec 24 '10 at 6:17 decyclone 22.8k54264 This com.com site is offline I guess... –dipi evil Apr 17 '15 at 13:28 add a comment| up vote 4 down vote Instead you can user @@Error.. check this article about error handling share|improve this answer edited Aug 20 '15 at 4:42 Community♦ 11 answered Dec 24 '10 at 6:20 Binil 4,61621837 add a comment| up vote 1 down vote @@ERROR is a variable updated by the SQL Server database engine after each statement is executed on the server. We can see by Print @@Error share|improve this answer edited Jan 7 '13 at 9:52 Soner Gönül 69.8k22110200 answered Dec 24 '10 at 10:46 thevan 3,4783494153 add a comment| up vote -1 down vote No Try Catch Was introduced 2005 and later version ,,,you have to use @@Error for handling your exception share|improve this answer answered Oct 22 '14 at 7:12 Md Shoaib Alam 85 1 Don't you think it is a little bit late? Like 4 years? –Soner Gönül Oct 22 '14 at 7:13 add a comment| Your
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 6.2 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Exception handling in SQL Server 2000 up vote 0 down vote favorite I have a procedure that gets data from a table and inserts it into a temporary table. Then the procedure validates one by one in a while loop. For example: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4524566/try-catch-in-sql-server-2000 I have 50 rows and the first row fails. In that case, I wish that the procedure continues processing the remaining 49 rows. I'm forcing an error in an insert statement and and I put under it @@error <> 0 but does not enter if block. But procedure ends and doesn't continues with the next statement to be executed. I am running the procedure from Query Analyzer and put message with print 'line 1' etc etc. Thank you for your help. This is a similar http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19551176/exception-handling-in-sql-server-2000 example create procedure procx as declare @ind_max int, @ind int, @var_id int, @var_name varchar(3) declare @table_x table ( row_id int identity(1,1), id_x int, name_x varchar(25), status_x int ) insert into @table_x values(1, 'xxx', 0) insert into @table_x values(2, 'yyy', 0) insert into @table_x values(3, 'zzz', 0) set @ind_max = 3 set @ind = 1 while (@ind <= @ind_max) begin print 'line 1' select @var_id = id_x , @var_name = name_x from @table_x where row_id = @ind -- Forced error id_x is int field -- Doesn't show line2, line3 ... -- Msg 245, Level 16, State 1, Procedure procx, Line 160 -- Syntax error converting the varchar value 'A' to a column of data type int. insert into test ( id_x , name_x ) values ( 'A' , @var_name ) if @@error != 0 begin print 'line 2' goto next_row insert into log_test values(@var_id, 'Error') end print 'line 3' update @table_x set status_x = 1 where row_id = @ind print 'line 4' next_row: set @ind = @ind + 1 end print 'line 5' sql sql-server stored-procedures sql-server-2000 share|improve this question edited Oct 23 '13 at 20:36 Nicholas Carey 38.3k64683 asked Oct 23 '13 at 19:59 NestorInc 49110 4 We need to see your query code. –Dai Oct 23 '13 at 20:02 If you add the t-sql for the stored procedure as part of your question, it might help get more (and more useful) responses. –Scraping Infinity Oct 23 '13 at 20:04 1 @@error gets reset after every statement
(Русский)ישראל (עברית)المملكة العربية السعودية (العربية)ไทย (ไทย)대한민국 (한국어)中华人民共和国 (中文)台灣 (中文)日本 (日本語) HomeLibraryLearnDownloadsTroubleshootingCommunityForums Ask a question Quick access Forums home Browse forums users FAQ Search related threads Remove From My Forums Answered by: Exception Handling SQL SERVER 2000 SQL Server > Transact-SQL Question 0 Sign in to vote Good evening to https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/a98683f3-895e-410b-a436-b337a89a2488/exception-handling-sql-server-2000?forum=transactsql all I have an enormous difficulty of adapting a processing exception of Oracle https://www.aspfree.com/c/a/ms-sql-server/exception-handling-in-sql-server-2000-and-2005/ to SQL Server 2000. In my routine treatment of exception in a procedure in Oracle using the following syntax in the event of an exception, it is not triggered on the screen to the end user. EX: BEGIN Exception WHEN OTHERS THEN NULL END; I have something similar in SQL SERVER 2000, I gave a error handling good search on google about it and found some things like using RAISERROR with the global variable @ @ ERROR and record the exception in the event log of windows instead of displaying on the screen but that does not adapt the default permissions of the User of my system in the bank (this feature requires that it is in the sysadmin of the instance in my case is sql server 2000 not feasible in this group puts it in my code because there are thousands of points that a referencio object of the bank with the default owner). I know that in SQL Server 2005 there is a solution with the BEGIN TRY END TRY; BEGIN CATCH END CATCH; I need a solution in SQL SERVER 2000! Thank you for your attention.Cpd - Centerlab Monday, April 27, 2009 12:18 PM Reply | Quote Answers 0 Sign in to vote Hi, Hey here is the exception handling sample code declare @errorCode as numeric begin transaction --update or insert, you transaction code set @errorCode = @@error if (@errorCode <> 0) go to ERROR_HANDLER -- your second transaction code set @errorCode = @@error if (@errorCode <> 0) go to ERROR_HANDLER Commit transaction set @errorCode = @@error if (@errorCode <> 0) go to ERROR_HANDLER ERROR_HANDLER: if (@errorCode <> 0) Rollback transaction Get more solutions in SQL Server, C#.Net 3.5/2.0/1.1, SharePoint -Mohammad Nizamuddin Proposed as answer by Sali SQL Wednesday, May 04, 2011 6:42 AM Marked as answer by Kalman TothModerator Monday, May 09, 2011 7:22 PM Monday, April 27, 2009 2:14 PM Reply | Quote All replies 0 Sign in to vote Hope this helps.Error Handling in SQL Server –
facebook google twitter rss Exception Handling in SQL Server 2000 and 2005 Posted on May 24, 2006 by JagadishChaterjee This article mainly discusses and compares the features of exception handling in Microsoft SQL Server 2000 with the same features in SQL Server 2005.Basically, in Microsoft SQL Server 2000, there exists no structured exception handling. We need to dependon @@ERROR for any errors that occur.Microsoft SQL Server 2005 has beenenhanced in such a way that developers program more powerful and error resistant SQL codewithstructured exception handling. In this article, I shall provide some samples in both SQL Server 2000 and SQL Server 2005. I shall also give explanations on both of the approaches by comparing each of them. I've tried to keep thisarticle looks as simple as possible to get beginners off to a good start. I am assuming that the readers of this article will have some knowledge of RDBMS along with some exposure to SQL Server 2000. Introduction to error handling Before going to exception handling, let us first determineall the possible ways to get errors. Errors may occur in T-SQL (of course not only in T-SQL) in several possible ways, including hardware failures, network failures, bugs in programs, out of memory and for several other reasons. We may not know which error has been raised at what moment. But we need to handle all such errors and provide some meaningful messages to the user (instead of making the user horrified with error messages that are impossible to understand). An exception is generally a runtime error which gets raised by SQL Server runtime when a T-SQL block is in the process of execution. Handling the exception is something like trapping the error (or exception) and inserting that error into the error_log table including date, error message, and other details. Storing error messages in the error_log table makes it easy to trace for future maintenance. It doesn’t mean that errors are in the table only for maintenance; we can take