Calculating Acceptable Error Rates
Contents |
across studies. However only fairly simple actions are used in the denominator. The Klemmer and Snyder study shows that much lower error rates
Calculating Error Rate Running Record
are possible--in this case for people whose job consisted almost entirely of data acceptable error rate six sigma entry. The error rate for more complex logic errors is about 5%, based primarily on data on other pages, acceptable error rate for pharmacies especially the program development page. Study Detail Error Rate Baddeley & Longman [1973] Entering mail codes. Errors after correction. Per mail code. 0.5% Chedru & Geschwind [1972] Grammatical errors
Acceptable Error Rate Manufacturing
per word 1.1% Dhillon [1986] Reading a gauge incorrectly. Per read. 0.5% Dremen and Berry [1995] Percentage error in security analysts' earnings forecasts for reporting earnings. 1980 / 1985 / 1990. That is, size of error rather than frequency of error. 30% 52% 65% Edmondson [1996] Errors per medication in hospital, based on data presented in the paper. Per dose. 1.6% Grudin [1983] Error
Acceptable Error Rate For Data Entry Work
rate per keystroke for six expert typists. Told not to correct errors, although some did. Per keystroke. 1% Hotopf [1980] S sample (speech errors). Per word 0.2% Hotopf [1980] W sample (written exam). Per word 0.9% Hotopf [1980] 10 undergraduates write for 30 minutes, grammatical and spelling errors per word 1.6% Klemmer [1962] Keypunch machine operators, errors per character 0.02% to 0.06% Klemmer [1962] Bank machine operators, errors per check 0.03% Kukich [1992] Nonword spelling errors in uses of telecommunication devices for the deaf. 40,000 words (strings). Per string. 6% Mathias, MacKenzie & Buxton [1996] 10 touch typists averaging 58 words per minute. No error correction. In last session. Per keystroke. 4% Mattson & Baars [1992] Typing study with secretaries and clerks. Nonsense words. Per nonsense word. 7.4% Melchers & Harrington [1982] Students performing calculator tasks and table lookup tasks. Per multipart calculation. Per table lookup. Etc. 1%-2% Mitton [1987] Study of 170,016 errors in high-school essays, spelling errors. Per word. 2.4% Potter [1995] Errors in making entries in an aircraft flight management system. Per keystroke. Higher if heavy workload. 10.0% Rabbit [1990] Flash one of two lette
Wellness Worldwide Plant Wellness Way Explained Operational Excellence Enterprise Asset acceptable human error rate Management Maintenance Management Business Process Improvement ISO 9001 Quality System
Acceptable Error Rate For Data Entry
Lean Manufacturing Training See Online Training Courses Public and In-House Courses Best Enterprise Asset human error rate prediction Management Master Maintenance Management Maintenance Planning- Scheduling Improve Equipment Reliability Precision Maintenance Up-Skilling Introduce Lean Improvements Workforce Engineering Training Free Articles Enterprise Asset http://panko.shidler.hawaii.edu/HumanErr/Basic.htm Management Maintenance Management Maintenance Planning and Scheduling Maintenance Engineering Solutions Reliability Improvement Work Quality Assurance Precision Maintenance Lean Management Methods Team Building Tutorials Plant and Equipment Wellness Enterprise Asset Management Maintenance Management Reliability Engineering Business Process Improvement Maintenance Planning- Scheduling ISO 9001 Quality System Lean Management http://www.lifetime-reliability.com/cms/tutorials/reliability-engineering/human_error_rate_table_insights/ Methods Free PWW Tutorial Videos FAQs Enterprise Asset Management Maintenance Management Maintenance Planning- Scheduling Maintenance Engineering Solutions Reliability Improvement Work Quality Assurance Precision Maintenance Lean Management Methods Team Building Online Store Maint Planning Online Training Maint Management Online Training Enterprise Asset Management PPT Maintenance Management PPT Reliability Engineering PPT Lean and Quality Management PPT Machinery Maintenance PPT Contact Us Lifetime-Reliability Solutions Navigation Home About Us LRS Mission and Values LRS Services and Consulting LRS Consultants Bios LRS Business JVs LRS Profit Share Jobs LRS Insight Newsletters LRS Conference PPTs Plant Wellness Videos Consulting LRS Services and Consulting Plant Wellness Worldwide Plant Wellness Way Explained Operational Excellence Enterprise Asset Management Maintenance Management Business Process Improvement ISO 9001 Quality System Lean Manufacturing Training See Online Training Courses Public and In-House Courses Best Enterprise Asset Management Master Maintenance Management Maintenance Plan
SixSigmaTraining.Com Our Team Accreditations Training and Certifications Lean Six Sigma Lean Six Sigma Black Belt Lean Six Sigma Green Belt Lean Six Sigma Yellow Belt Lean Six Sigma White Belt Six Sigma Six Sigma http://sixsigmatraining.com/leading-six-sigma/what-is-an-acceptable-error-rate-in-contact-centers.html Black Belt Six Sigma Green Belt Lean Lean Expert Lean Overview Lean Healthcare Lean Healthcare http://www.accountingtools.com/transaction-error-rate Overview Lean Healthcare Expert Upgrades Lean Overview to Lean Expert Lean Overview to Lean Six Sigma White Belt Lean Expert to Lean Six Sigma Yellow Belt Lean Six Sigma White Belt to Lean Six Sigma Yellow Belt Lean Six Sigma Green Belt to Lean Six Sigma Black Belt Lean Six Sigma Yellow Belt to Lean Six Sigma Green Belt Extensions error rate Lean Expert Extension Six Sigma Green Belt Extension Six Sigma Black Belt Extension Lean Six Sigma Yellow Belt Extension Lean Six Sigma Green Belt Extension Lean Six Sigma Black Belt Extension Coached Training Katsuhiko Sakamoto Kevin Ryan Peter L. Bersbach David Greco Miscellaneous Certification Exam Retake Resources What is Six Sigma? What You Must Know Podcasts Webinars Useful Links Subscriptions Monthly Subscription Annual Subscription Reviews Customer Reviews Third Party Reviews Pyzdek Institute Vs. “Low Cost” acceptable error rate Alternatives Blog Payment Plans FAQs Contact Us What is an Acceptable Error Rate in Contact Centers? There are two diametrically opposed answers to the question posed in the title. Here is the first one: a jaw-dropping number of calls completely riddled with errors is totally acceptable in call centers today. Preposterous, you say. Please keep reading. First, the big picture. In contact centers no one talks about Six Sigma or Five-9s, or Taguchi's "on target with minimum variation." Those ideas are constantly being discussed in manufacturing, but are laughable notions in call centers. No one talks about it. No one aspires to it. No one even thinks anything remotely close is even possible. Further, no one does any benchmarking to see what "world class" companies do so that "stretch goals" can be established around even a "tolerable" level of agent errors. OK, fine you say, so contact centers don't set their sites very high. What if we just went from center to center and determined the error rate and called the average across those centers "acceptable?" You wouldn't even be able to do that. In manufacturing, specs are sine qua non and performance against those specs is constantly measured. But for some reason, contact centers rarely even define, by call type, specs or Required Call Components…exactly what the agent is supposed to do
Topics Management Accounting Topics Finance Topics Finance Topics Podcast Accounting Best Practices Podcast Index Podcast Feedback Q&A Q&A Q&A Index Dictionary Dictionary About About Contact Home CPE Accounting CPE Enrolled Agents CPE Books Accounting & Finance Books Management & Operations Books e-Books Bookkeeper Library CFO Library Controller Library Financial Analysis Library Textbooks Textbooks Accounting Topics Financial Accounting Topics Management Accounting Topics Finance Topics Finance Topics Podcast Accounting Best Practices Podcast Index Podcast Feedback Q&A Q&A Q&A Index Dictionary Dictionary About About Contact Home Top CPE Accounting CPE Enrolled Agents CPE Books Accounting & Finance Books Management & Operations Books e-Books Bookkeeper Library CFO Library Controller Library Financial Analysis Library Textbooks Textbooks Accounting Topics Financial Accounting Topics Management Accounting Topics Finance Topics Finance Topics Podcast Accounting Best Practices Podcast Index Podcast Feedback Q&A Q&A Q&A Index Dictionary Dictionary About About Contact Home
Accounting Bestsellers Accountants' GuidebookAccounting Controls Guidebook Accounting for Inventory Accounting for ManagersAccounting Procedures Guidebook Bookkeeping Guidebook Budgeting Business Ratios GuidebookCFO Guidebook Closing the Books Controller GuidebookCorporate Cash ManagementCost Accounting Fundamentals Cost Management GuidebookCredit & CollectionsEnterprise Risk ManagementFinancial Analysis Fixed Asset Accounting Fraud ExaminationGAAP Guidebook IFRS Guidebook Lean Accounting Guidebook MBA GuidebookMergers & AcquisitionsPayables ManagementPayroll ManagementPublic Company AccountingSmall Audit Practice SetTreasurer's Guidebook This form does not yet contain any fields. Home >> Financial Ratios Transaction Error Rate It is critical to avoid transaction errors, since the cost of correcting them is several multiples of the cost of initially completing them correctly. Consequently, one of the better metrics is to monitor the transaction error rate. The error rate should be monitored in conjunction with the total number of transactions processed by each person, in order to ascertain whether any efficiency improvements under a lean accounting program are actually causing additional errors. The measurement can be further refined by focusing on those transaction errors that require the most time to fix. The transaction error rate is useful as a free-standing measure of performance in any department, since the time of seni