Data Entry Error Rate Statistics
Contents |
across studies. However only fairly simple actions are used in the denominator. The Klemmer and Snyder study shows that much lower error rates are possible--in
Single Data Entry Error Rate
this case for people whose job consisted almost entirely of data entry. manual data entry error rate The error rate for more complex logic errors is about 5%, based primarily on data on other pages, especially the
Average Data Entry Error Rate
program development page. Study Detail Error Rate Baddeley & Longman [1973] Entering mail codes. Errors after correction. Per mail code. 0.5% Chedru & Geschwind [1972] Grammatical errors per word 1.1% acceptable data entry error rate Dhillon [1986] Reading a gauge incorrectly. Per read. 0.5% Dremen and Berry [1995] Percentage error in security analysts' earnings forecasts for reporting earnings. 1980 / 1985 / 1990. That is, size of error rather than frequency of error. 30% 52% 65% Edmondson [1996] Errors per medication in hospital, based on data presented in the paper. Per dose. 1.6% Grudin [1983] Error rate per keystroke for data entry error rate standard six expert typists. Told not to correct errors, although some did. Per keystroke. 1% Hotopf [1980] S sample (speech errors). Per word 0.2% Hotopf [1980] W sample (written exam). Per word 0.9% Hotopf [1980] 10 undergraduates write for 30 minutes, grammatical and spelling errors per word 1.6% Klemmer [1962] Keypunch machine operators, errors per character 0.02% to 0.06% Klemmer [1962] Bank machine operators, errors per check 0.03% Kukich [1992] Nonword spelling errors in uses of telecommunication devices for the deaf. 40,000 words (strings). Per string. 6% Mathias, MacKenzie & Buxton [1996] 10 touch typists averaging 58 words per minute. No error correction. In last session. Per keystroke. 4% Mattson & Baars [1992] Typing study with secretaries and clerks. Nonsense words. Per nonsense word. 7.4% Melchers & Harrington [1982] Students performing calculator tasks and table lookup tasks. Per multipart calculation. Per table lookup. Etc. 1%-2% Mitton [1987] Study of 170,016 errors in high-school essays, spelling errors. Per word. 2.4% Potter [1995] Errors in making entries in an aircraft flight management system. Per keystroke. Higher if heavy workload. 10.0% Rabbit [1990] Flash one of two letters on display screen. Subject hits one of t
Health Search databasePMCAll DatabasesAssemblyBioProjectBioSampleBioSystemsBooksClinVarCloneConserved DomainsdbGaPdbVarESTGeneGenomeGEO DataSetsGEO ProfilesGSSGTRHomoloGeneMedGenMeSHNCBI Web SiteNLM CatalogNucleotideOMIMPMCPopSetProbeProteinProtein ClustersPubChem BioAssayPubChem CompoundPubChem
Acceptable Error Rate For Data Entry Work
SubstancePubMedPubMed HealthSNPSRAStructureTaxonomyToolKitToolKitAllToolKitBookToolKitBookghUniGeneSearch termSearch Advanced Journal list Help Journal ListJ error rate statistics sample size Am Med Inform Assocv.15(3); May-Jun 2008PMC2409998 J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 May-Jun;
Human Error Rate Statistics
15(3): 386–389. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2381PMCID: PMC2409998Reducing Errors from the Electronic Transcription of Data Collected on Paper Forms: A Research Data Case StudyMonika M. http://panko.shidler.hawaii.edu/HumanErr/Basic.htm Wahi, MPH, a , b , ∗ David V. Parks, BSEE, MBA, b Robert C. Skeate, MD, c and Steven B. Goldin, MD, PhD d aDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Florida College of Public Health, Tampa, FLbDepartment of Facilities and Academic Support https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2409998/ for Technology, Johnnie B. Byrd, Sr., Alzheimer's Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FLcNorth Central Blood Services, American Red Cross, St. Paul, MNdDepartment of Surgery, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, FL.∗Correspondence: Monika M. Wahi, MPH, Department of Facilities and Academic Support for Technology, Byrd Alzheimer's Institute, 4001 East Fletcher Avenue, Tampa, FL 33613 (Email: gro.etutitsnidryb@ihawm).Author information ► Article notes ► Copyright and License information ►Received 2007 Jan 17; Accepted 2008 Jan 2.Copyright © 2008, American Medical Informatics AssociationThis article has been cited by other articles in PMC.AbstractWe conducted a reliability study comparing single data entry (SE) into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet to entry using the existing forms (EF) feature of the Teleforms software system, in which optical character recognition is used to capture data off of paper forms designed in no
More → Top 6 Manual Data Entry Challenges Companies Face Top 6 Manual Data Entry Challenges that Companies Face According to an AIIM survey https://www.invensis.net/blog/data-processing/top-6-manual-data-entry-challenges-companies-face titled ‘Paper Wars 2014’1 of 444 respondents in 2014, 68% believed that https://www.isixsigma.com/topic/data-entry-error-is-there-a-standard-solution/ business-at-the-speed-of-paper would be unacceptable in a few years, and 46% stated that removal of paper has been the biggest single productivity improvement for most of their business processes. As organizations increasingly adopt digitization of paper documents to improve efficiency, co-ordination, productivity and management, manual data entry is error rate one task that continues to grow in importance. Whether inbound documents take the shape of feedback forms, catalogs, purchase orders, invoices, or any other, it is critical to capture all relevant information from these documents into software applications, Excel sheets, ERP applications or cloud-based applications for further processing and utilization. However, in-house manual data entry comes with its own set data entry error of challenges for an organization, when it comes to the quality of output, speed, accuracy and other factors. Six of these pain points are described below: High Error Rate: The reasons for a high error rate could vary – from inadequate training of data entry professionals to human error, illegible handwritten forms, misinterpretation of comments, and so on. Whatever the reason, the net impact could be one that is debilitating for the business, whether it has a negative effect on internal operations, customer satisfaction or external supplier relationships. It is important for an organization to take action, firstly by identifying the error rate that is taking place. One way to do this is by picking a sample of records on a periodic basis and entering the same fields into the output of the query for verification. The average benchmark for data entry error rate is generally acknowledged to be 1%. Thus, any higher error rate could be a matter of grave concern for the business. Slow Turnaround Time: It is generally held that a good sp
Events Submit an Event News Read News Submit News Jobs Visit the Jobs Board Search Jobs Post a Job Marketplace Visit the Marketplace Assessments Case Studies Certification E-books Project Examples Reference Guides Research Templates Training Materials & Aids Videos Newsletters Join71,769 other iSixSigma newsletter subscribers: THURSDAY, OCTOBER 06, 2016 Font Size Login Register Topic Data Entry Error (Is there a standard solution) Data Entry Error (Is there a standard solution) Home › Forums › Old Forums › General › Data Entry Error (Is there a standard solution) This topic contains 9 replies, has 10 voices, and was last updated by N.Saravanan 9 years, 2 months ago. Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total) Author Posts Tweet April 22, 2004 at 6:27 am #58108 bach hussParticipant @bach-huss Reputation - 0 Rank - Aluminum Hi all, I am doing a Six Sigma project on a transactional problem. It seems that the data entered (price of material) into the database varies from site to site. Looking at the whole process to identify the source of the error, the team finds that the database entry process as the sources of the error. Tracing back the data entry it seems that the source is from the supplier. All that happening is that database are tranfered to one another and the very basic entry would be done by human. I was wondering if there is any standard solution to make sure that the database from data entry is really accurate. I imagine people in the banking arena will have to enter large data and accurately. Thanks in advance bach April 22, 2004 at 6:47 am #58109 Nitin SahniMember @Nitin-Sahni Reputation - 0 Rank - Aluminum Hi Bach - a standard solution to data entry problems is make two people do the data entry job for the same data set. A macro in background checks whether the data sets are identical and if not it raises alarms so the relevent correction can be made. The logic is simple - probability of two people making the same da