Ddr Ram Error Rate
Contents |
Kingdom United States ZDNet around the globe: ZDNet Belgium ZDNet China ZDNet France ZDNet Germany ZDNet Korea ZDNet Japan Go Central Europe Middle East Scandinavia Africa UK Italy Spain more Estonia ecc ram European Union Mobility Hardware Innovation See All Topics White Papers Downloads Reviews Galleries Videos
Error Correction Code
Newsletters All Writers Log In to ZDNET Join ZDNet About ZDNet Manage Profile Newsletters Author Alerts Discussion Alerts Recent Activity Log ecc encryption Out Go Menu Central Europe Middle East Scandinavia Africa UK Italy Spain Estonia European Union Mobility Hardware Innovation See All Topics White Papers Downloads Reviews Galleries Videos Log In to ZDNET Join ZDNet About ZDNet
Ecc Memory Vs Non Ecc
Manage Profile Newsletters Author Alerts Discussion Alerts Recent Activity Log Out eu Asia Australia Europe India United Kingdom United States ZDNet around the globe: ZDNet Belgium ZDNet China ZDNet France ZDNet Germany ZDNet Korea ZDNet Japan DRAM error rates: Nightmare on DIMM street A two-and-a-half year study of DRAM on 10s of thousands Google servers found DIMM error rates are hundreds to thousands of times higher than thought -- a dram bit error rate mean of 3,751 correctable errors per DIMM per year.This is the world's first large-scale study of RAM errors in the field. By Robin Harris for Storage Bits | October 4, 2009 -- 22:04 GMT (23:04 BST) | Topic: Hardware A two-and-a-half year study of DRAM on 10s of thousands Google servers found DIMM error rates are hundreds to thousands of times higher than thought -- a mean of 3,751 correctable errors per DIMM per year. This is the world's first large-scale study of RAM errors in the field. It looked at multiple vendors, DRAM densities and DRAM types including DDR1, DDR2 and FB-DIMM. Every system architect and motherboard designer should read it carefully. If you can’t trust DRAM . . . Here are some hard numbers from DRAM Errors in the Wild: A Large-Scale Field Study by Bianca Schroeder, U of Toronto, and Eduardo Pinheiro and Wolf-Dietrich Weber of Google. The Google servers use ECC DRAM that typically corrects single bit errors and reports double bit errors. It is a rare notebook or consumer desktop that supports ECC. You could be having DRAM problems and not know it because even the system doesn't know. Non-ECC DRAM is more common Most DIMMs don’t include ECC because it costs more. Wit
or Non-parity? You may have to decide whether you want ECC or non-parity. ECC can find and correct some
Environmental Compliance Certificate
memory errors, but it comes with a performance price-it will slow your system
Dram Soft Error Rate
by about 2%. Fortunately, memory errors are rare in today's memory chips, so most average users don't have a early childhood caries need for ECC. If you're planning to use your system as a server or other "mission-critical" machine, we recommend ECC. If you're looking for maximum speed, we recommend non-parity. What is http://www.zdnet.com/article/dram-error-rates-nightmare-on-dimm-street/ ECC SDRAM? ECC (error correction code) SDRAM is memory that is able to detect and correct some SDRAM errors without user intervention. ECC SDRAM replaced parity memory which could only detect, but not correct, SDRAM errors. What are Parity and ECC (Error Checking and Correction)? Early on, RAM was not as stable a solution as it is today. Irregularities could cause the http://www.computer-memory-upgrade-stick.com/ecc-vs-non-ecc.htm data in memory to corrupt or alter in ways that often led to a system crash or hard disk data damage. This problem was first solved with Parity RAM. Through additional or modified chips, it added an additional bit to each byte of RAM which verified the validity of each byte. If the data did not check out properly, your computer would typically halt to avoid further problems. ECC added a further process to the cycle. Instead of merely checking the bytes, it can correct most errors with an extra bit. It is fairly popular with the CAD crowd, as it helps maintains strict accuracy. For most consumers, however, it is not necessary due to the low rate of errors in today's memory, and actually involves a slight performance hit. What causes SDRAM errors? Per Dell, "Memory errors are characterized as hard or soft. Hard errors are caused by defects in the silicon or metalization of the SDRAM package, and are usually permanent once they manifest. Soft errors are caused by charged particles or radiation, and are transient. In the past, soft errors were primarily caus
Cars Gaming & Culture Forums Settings Front page layout Grid List Unified Site theme Black on white White on black http://arstechnica.com/business/2009/10/dram-study-turns-assumptions-about-errors-upside-down/ Feature Report Series The Rise of Specialized Databases Sign in Comment activity Sign up or login to join the discussions! Stay logged in | Having trouble? Sign up to comment and more Sign up Ars Technica UK Ministry of Innovation — DRAM study turns assumptions about errors upside down If you thought that quality among DRAM DIMMs was evenly distributed, error rate or that … Jon Stokes - Oct 8, 2009 1:11 am UTC reader comments Share this story The conventional wisdom about DRAM error rates is that errors are rare, and the majority of the errors that do occur are so-called "soft errors"--randomly corrupted bits that have been flipped by incoming cosmic rays. But a recent large-scale study of DRAM errors released ddr ram error by Google turns this wisdom on its head, and in doing so reinforces the importance of error correction coding (ECC) and regular hardware replacement for datacenter machines. Google's 2.5-year study of DRAM error rates in its datacenters is the largest such real-world study ever released; prior studies have been based on lab tests done under artificially high-stress conditions, with the results then extrapolated to give a picture of real-world conditions. Google engineers tracked errors as they happened, and logged both the errors and relevant data like temperature, CPU utilization, and memory allocated. After analyzing the data, they drew seven main conclusions about the nature, frequency, and causes of DRAM errors. The headline conclusion in the study is that DRAM errors are vastly more common than is typically assumed. Nearly one-third of the individual machines in the study saw at least one error per year, a rate that's orders of magnitude higher than previous research had indicated. To give some hard numbers, previous studies report 200 to 5,000 failures in time per billion hours of operation (FIT) per Mbit;