Error.grammar.inlined
1 of 1 Author Message brent.russell Website Posts: 50Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 2:34 pmLocation: SOCAL Converting recorded sound Thu Jun 07, 2007 1:11 pm I noticed that when I record a 2 minute message and post it to my server, it is only 60-300 kilobytes! I am developing an application that will accept mp3's from people and they will be used as voice prompts in an IVR system. However, the average user does not know anything about compression of sound files so I need to do this for them. Can you tell me how your system is compressing these sound files? Is it being done in TCL or is is being done by a Cisco box or do you have a command line program such as Sox that converts sound files to a small file size? I need to do this programatically on my side and not with a simple win 32bit GUI program. I realize this is not your area but maybee you can provide som insite on how your server is doing it. Thank you Top support Website Posts: 3067Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 4:47 pmLocation: Boston, MA IVR question- use lame to compress files to mp3 format Thu Jun 07, 2007 4:07 pm You can use lame (http://lame.sourceforge.net/index.php) to compress files into MP3 format. It's a powerful and flexible MP3 command-line conversion tool which can run on pretty much any operating system, including IVR. Top Display posts from previous: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by AuthorPost timeSubject AscendingDescending Post a reply 2 posts • Page 1 of 1 Return to Plum DEV Q&A Jump to: Select a forum ------------------ News General News Release News Frequently Asked Questions Plum DEV FAQs Plum iOn FAQs User Forums Plum DEV Q&A Plum iOn Q&A Plum Pre-built Applications Q&A Plum Survey Q&A Plum Insight Q&A Plum Fuse Q&A Who is online Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Google [Bot], Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
ietf.org> Subject: Re: [MEDIACTRL] msc-ivr XSD not allowing to use an inlined custom grammar From: "McGlashan, Scott"
and Fields Interfaces Visibility Modifiers Extensions Data Classes Generics Nested Classes Enum Classes Objects Delegation Delegated Properties https://kotlinlang.org/docs/reference/inline-functions.html Functions and Lambdas Functions Lambdas Inline Functions Other Destructuring Declarations Collections Ranges Type Checks and Casts This expressions Equality Operator overloading Null Safety Exceptions Annotations https://downloads.avaya.com/elmodocs2/voice_portal/R4.1/AVBSpecificEvents.html Reflection Type-Safe Builders Reference API Reference Grammar Java Interop Calling Java from Kotlin Calling Kotlin from Java JavaScript Dynamic Type JavaScript Modules JavaScript Reflection Tools Documenting Kotlin Code Using Maven Using Ant Using Gradle Kotlin and OSGi FAQ FAQ Comparison to Java Comparison to Scala Full Kotlin Reference Edit Page Inline Functions Using higher-order functions imposes certain runtime penalties: each function is an object, and it captures a closure, i.e. those variables that are accessed in the body of the function. Memory allocations (both for function objects and classes) and virtual calls introduce runtime overhead. But it appears that in many cases this kind of overhead can be eliminated by inlining the lambda expressions. The functions shown below are good examples of this situation. I.e., the lock() function could be easily inlined at call-sites. Consider the following case: lock(l) { foo() } Instead of creating a function object for the parameter and generating a call, the compiler could emit the following code l.lock() try { foo() } finally { l.unlock() } Isn’t it what we wanted from the very beginning? To make the compiler do this, we need to mark the lock() function with the inline modifier: inline fun
targeted dialog could not be found. For example, it cannot match the specified