Margin Of Error In News
Contents |
In FAQ You are logged in as Log out Sign In FAQ Close Weather Alert 11 weather alerts Crime Dallas Ambush Texas Health Business Politics Investigates Education Close New poll: Trump lead shrinks in Texas, within margin of margin of error polls error A new poll of Texas voters shows Donald Trump's lead shrinking in the
Margin Of Error Formula
Lone Star State, to within the margin of error. Jason Whitely reports. Jason Whitely, WFAA 10:26 PM. CDT October 13, 2016 CONNECT survey margin of error calculator TWEET LINKEDIN GOOGLE+ PINTEREST DALLAS - After perhaps the most damaging week of his campaign, Donald Trump’s lead in Texas has slipped to four percentage points – within the margin of error – according to a new polls with margin of error and sample size poll released Thursday night.The survey, commissioned by WFAA-TV and Texas TEGNA television stations, shows Trump leading Hillary Clinton by 47 percent to 43 percent. The margin of error is four percent."I think to put these numbers in context - it shows that Trump's position has eroded a little bit. His lead is down to four percentage points according to this poll, but even in the wake of some really terrible news for him, he
Margin Of Error In Polls Definition
still leads in Texas, which shows what a tough nut Texas is to crack for Democratic candidates right now,” said Matthew Wilson, Associate Professor of Political Science at Southern Methodist University in Dallas.Don't see graphics below? Tap here. SurveyUSA conducted the poll between Monday and Wednesday of this week – after both the 2005 video in which Trump used lewd comments describing women and the second presidential debate in St. Louis on Sunday night.In recent weeks, two other statewide polls showed Trump up by six and seven points, respectively."It pretty consistently shows that Trump is struggling in Texas more than a Republican typically would,” Wilson added. “He's still highly likely to win the state in the end but we typically see double digit margins for Republican candidates and Trump seems unlikely to produce that.For perspective, Mitt Romney won Texas by 16 points in 2012, John McCain won this state by 13 points in 2008, George W. Bush carried his home state by 23 points in 2004, and 22 points in 2000 when he was elected to his first term.The eroding support in the largest Republican state in the country could suggest deeper problems for Trump nationwide, Wilson explained.Regionally, Trump leads by eight points in North Texas, which includes Dallas and Fort Worth and 41 surrounding counties. In Hou
Learn more » Need to connect http://www.wfaa.com/news/local/texas-news/new-poll-trump-lead-shrinks-in-texas-within-margin-of-error/335896258 your Home Delivery subscription to NYTimes.com? Link your subscription » Log in with Facebook Log in with Google or In order to http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/06/upshot/when-you-hear-the-margin-of-error-is-plus-or-minus-3-percent-think-7-instead.html access our Web site, your Web browser must accept cookies from NYTimes.com. More information » Email address Password Remember Me Forgot password? Terms of Service Privacy Policy LOG IN Contact Us NYTimes.com » Home Delivery » © 2016 The New York Times Company Site Map Privacy Your Ad Choices Advertise Terms of Sale Terms of Service Work With Us RSS Help Contact Us Site Feedback
accurate, assuming you counted the votes correctly. (By the way, there's a whole other topic in math that describes the errors http://www.robertniles.com/stats/margin.shtml people can make when they try to measure things like that. But, for now, let's assume you can count with 100% accuracy.) Here's the problem: Running elections costs a lot of money. It's simply not practical to conduct a public election every time you want to test a new product or ad campaign. So companies, campaigns and news organizations ask a randomly selected small margin of number of people instead. The idea is that you're surveying a sample of people who will accurately represent the beliefs or opinions of the entire population. But how many people do you need to ask to get a representative sample? The best way to figure this one is to think about it backwards. Let's say you picked a specific number of people in the United margin of error States at random. What then is the chance that the people you picked do not accurately represent the U.S. population as a whole? For example, what is the chance that the percentage of those people you picked who said their favorite color was blue does not match the percentage of people in the entire U.S. who like blue best? Of course, our little mental exercise here assumes you didn't do anything sneaky like phrase your question in a way to make people more or less likely to pick blue as their favorite color. Like, say, telling people "You know, the color blue has been linked to cancer. Now that I've told you that, what is your favorite color?" That's called a leading question, and it's a big no-no in surveying. Common sense will tell you (if you listen...) that the chance that your sample is off the mark will decrease as you add more people to your sample. In other words, the more people you ask, the more likely you are to get a representative sample. This is easy so far, right? Okay, enough with the common sense. It's time fo
be down. Please try the request again. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Generated Thu, 20 Oct 2016 12:39:59 GMT by s_wx1157 (squid/3.5.20)