Outside The Margin Of Error
Contents |
Tank - Our Lives in Numbers September 8, 2016 5 key things to know about the margin of error in election polls By Andrew Mercer8 comments In presidential elections, even the smallest changes in horse-race poll
Margin Of Error In Polls Definition
results seem to become imbued with deep meaning. But they are often overstated. margin of error polls Pollsters disclose a margin of error so that consumers can have an understanding of how much precision they can reasonably
Polls With Margin Of Error And Sample Size
expect. But cool-headed reporting on polls is harder than it looks, because some of the better-known statistical rules of thumb that a smart consumer might think apply are more nuanced than they seem. margin of error example In other words, as is so often true in life, it’s complicated. Here are some tips on how to think about a poll’s margin of error and what it means for the different kinds of things we often try to learn from survey data. 1What is the margin of error anyway? Because surveys only talk to a sample of the population, we know that the survey margin of error calculator result probably won’t exactly match the “true” result that we would get if we interviewed everyone in the population. The margin of sampling error describes how close we can reasonably expect a survey result to fall relative to the true population value. A margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points at the 95% confidence level means that if we fielded the same survey 100 times, we would expect the result to be within 3 percentage points of the true population value 95 of those times. The margin of error that pollsters customarily report describes the amount of variability we can expect around an individual candidate’s level of support. For example, in the accompanying graphic, a hypothetical Poll A shows the Republican candidate with 48% support. A plus or minus 3 percentage point margin of error would mean that 48% Republican support is within the range of what we would expect if the true level of support in the full population lies somewhere 3 points in either direction – i.e., between 45% and 51%. 2How do I know if a candidate’s lead is ‘outside the margin of error’? News reports about polling will
WorkSocial MediaSoftwareProgrammingWeb Design & DevelopmentBusinessCareersComputers Online Courses B2B Solutions Shop for Books San Francisco, CA Brr, it´s cold outside Search Submit RELATED ARTICLES How to Interpret the Margin of Error in Statistics Statistics Essentials For
Margin Of Error Statistics Definition
Dummies Statistics For Dummies, 2nd Edition SPSS Statistics for Dummies, 3rd acceptable margin of error Edition Statistics II for Dummies Load more EducationMathStatisticsHow to Interpret the Margin of Error in Statistics How to
Presidential Poll Margin Of Error
Interpret the Margin of Error in Statistics Related Book Statistics For Dummies, 2nd Edition By Deborah J. Rumsey You've probably heard or seen results like this: "This statistical survey http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/09/08/understanding-the-margin-of-error-in-election-polls/ had a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points." What does this mean? Most surveys are based on information collected from a sample of individuals, not the entire population (as a census would be). A certain amount of error is bound to occur -- not in the sense of calculation error (although there may be http://www.dummies.com/education/math/statistics/how-to-interpret-the-margin-of-error-in-statistics/ some of that, too) but in the sense of sampling error, which is the error that occurs simply because the researchers aren't asking everyone. The margin of error is supposed to measure the maximum amount by which the sample results are expected to differ from those of the actual population. Because the results of most survey questions can be reported in terms of percentages, the margin of error most often appears as a percentage, as well. How do you interpret a margin of error? Suppose you know that 51% of people sampled say that they plan to vote for Ms. Calculation in the upcoming election. Now, projecting these results to the whole voting population, you would have to add and subtract the margin of error and give a range of possible results in order to have sufficient confidence that you're bridging the gap between your sample and the population. Supposing a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points, you would be pretty confident that between 48% (= 51% -
accurate, assuming you counted the votes correctly. (By the way, there's a whole other topic in math that describes the errors people can make when they try to measure things like that. But, for now, let's http://www.robertniles.com/stats/margin.shtml assume you can count with 100% accuracy.) Here's the problem: Running elections costs a lot of money. It's simply not practical to conduct a public election every time you want to test a new product or ad campaign. So companies, campaigns and news organizations ask a randomly selected small number of people instead. The idea is that you're surveying a sample of people who will accurately represent the beliefs or opinions of the entire population. But how many people margin of do you need to ask to get a representative sample? The best way to figure this one is to think about it backwards. Let's say you picked a specific number of people in the United States at random. What then is the chance that the people you picked do not accurately represent the U.S. population as a whole? For example, what is the chance that the percentage of those people you picked who said their favorite color was blue margin of error does not match the percentage of people in the entire U.S. who like blue best? Of course, our little mental exercise here assumes you didn't do anything sneaky like phrase your question in a way to make people more or less likely to pick blue as their favorite color. Like, say, telling people "You know, the color blue has been linked to cancer. Now that I've told you that, what is your favorite color?" That's called a leading question, and it's a big no-no in surveying. Common sense will tell you (if you listen...) that the chance that your sample is off the mark will decrease as you add more people to your sample. In other words, the more people you ask, the more likely you are to get a representative sample. This is easy so far, right? Okay, enough with the common sense. It's time for some math. (insert smirk here) The formula that describes the relationship I just mentioned is basically this: The margin of error in a sample = 1 divided by the square root of the number of people in the sample How did someone come up with that formula, you ask? Like most formulas in statistics, this one can trace its roots back to pathetic gamblers who were so desperate to hit the jackpot that they'd even stoop to mathematics for an "edge." If you really want to know t