Error Iterating
Contents |
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About what is asymptotic error Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring asymptotic error constant definition developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the
Newton Method Error Formula
Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Error iterating through a Pandas series
Newton's Method Error Bound
up vote 3 down vote favorite When I get the first and second elements of this series, it works OK, but from element 3 onwards, giving an error when I try to fetch. type(X_test_raw) Out[51]: pandas.core.series.Series len(X_test_raw) Out[52]: 1393 X_test_raw[0] Out[45]: 'Go until jurong point, crazy.. Available only in bugis n great world la e buffet... Cine there got amore wat...' X_test_raw[1] Out[46]: 'Ok lar... Joking newton's method error analysis wif u oni...' X_test_raw[2] KeyError: 2 python pandas for-loop indexing keyerror share|improve this question edited Sep 13 at 6:49 jezrael 56.7k152758 asked Sep 13 at 6:41 Sarang 908 add a comment| 2 Answers 2 active oldest votes up vote 2 down vote accepted consider the series X_test_raw X_test_raw = pd.Series( ['Go until jurong point, crazy.. Available only in bugis n great world la e buffet... Cine there got amore wat...', 'Ok lar... Joking wif u oni...', 'PLEASE DON\'T FAIL' ], [0, 1, 3]) X_test_raw doesn't have an index of 2 which you are trying to reference with X_test_raw[2]. Instead use iloc X_test_raw.iloc[2] "PLEASE DON'T FAIL" You can iterate through the series with iteritems for index_val, series_val in X_test_raw.iteritems(): print series_val Go until jurong point, crazy.. Available only in bugis n great world la e buffet... Cine there got amore wat... Ok lar... Joking wif u oni... PLEASE DON'T FAIL share|improve this answer edited Sep 13 at 6:51 answered Sep 13 at 6:45 piRSquared 26.9k42052 Thanks, its working as desired now :) –Sarang Sep 13 at 6:53 add a comment| up vote 3 down vote There is no index with value 2. Sample: X_test_raw = p
I can't use the standard try macro inside the function, so I implemented my own variant that rewraps errors in Some(Err(..)) instead. The most common case for an
Error Analysis For Iterative Methods
iterator is to stop upon discovering an error. This usually doesn't just happen asymptotic error definition naturally, so I had to implement a wrapper around an iterator that remembers the fact of getting an Err newton's method error estimate value and produces Nones from then on. Now I have to be careful to always use wrapped iterators as the raw ones just keep producing errors indefinitely. I'm sure this is not http://stackoverflow.com/questions/39463692/error-iterating-through-a-pandas-series how it should be and I have a strong feeling that there must have been a big design discussion about it somewhere but I couldn't find any… Any pointers? gkoz 2015-08-19 22:19:30 UTC #2 isagalaev: The most common case for an iterator is to stop upon discovering an error. This usually doesn't just happen naturally Can you expand on this? Why does the consumer's error https://users.rust-lang.org/t/handling-errors-from-iterators/2551 handling code not stop after an error? isagalaev 2015-08-19 22:28:27 UTC #3 My first consumer was a test that simply called .last() on an iterator and it never happened. Put more generally, there can be useful consumers (like adaptors) that don't inspect values deeper than Some/None distinction. gkoz 2015-08-20 11:26:02 UTC #4 Iterator adaptors are wrappers too and there doesn't seem to be a way around remembering to apply a particular adaptor. This use case seems to call for either an inclusive variant of take_while or take_until let a = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]; let mut it = a.iter().take_until(|&a| *a >= 2); assert_eq!(it.next(), Some(&1)); assert_eq!(it.next(), Some(&2)); assert!(it.next().is_none()); bluss 2015-08-20 11:30:23 UTC #5 Iterator adaptors sort of break down if you need short-circuiting on errors. It totally makes sense to have an adaptor that stops after the first error. I wonder, how often is this kind of thing sufficient though? for result in iterator { let elt = try!(result); // rest of the loop } kstep 2015-08-21 00:01:23 UTC #6 If you really need to stop iterator on error and make it iterator's logic, stop it by returning None. If you need t
a New Ticket Search: LoginNotifications Context Navigation ← Previous TicketNext Ticket → Opened 4 months ago Closed 4 months ago #36992 closed defect (bug) (fixed) In https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/36992 get_terms(), getting a fatal error iterating on $terms inside get_terms filter. https://community.openhab.org/t/java-error-iterating-over-group-of-items-previously-worked/13046 Reported by: JustinSainton Owned by: boonebgorges Milestone: 4.6 Priority: normal Severity: normal Version: 4.6 Component: Taxonomy Keywords: Focuses: Cc: Description Our plugin (WP eCommerce) has a filter on get_terms for some custom sorting. In WP 4.5.2, this code works fine. In trunk, it is broken. method error After chatting a bit with @boone, our best guess is that the move to WP_Term_Query moved the filtering of get_terms() so that counts are now filtered, and before, they likely were not. To be clear - the fault is in our code (we should have assumed possible return types of int, WP_Error, or an array), newton's method error but there is a clear change in core. For us, the intermediate solution is to simply add an is_array() check and return early. For core, it may be worth ensuring that the values are only filtered in the same places that they were in previous versions of WordPress. Oldest first Newest first Threaded Comments only Change History (9) #1 @JustinSainton 4 months ago Update: Confirmed @boonebgorges' suspicion: https://github.com/WordPress/WordPress/blob/4.5.2/wp-includes/taxonomy.php#L1640-L1642 Also, existing code has an unused remnant variable. #2 @boonebgorges 4 months ago In 37622: Remove unused variable from get_terms(). Missed in [37572]. See #35381. Props JustinSainton. See #36992. #3 @boonebgorges 4 months ago Milestone changed from Awaiting Review to 4.6 #4 @boonebgorges 4 months ago Owner set to boonebgorges Resolution set to fixed Status changed from new to closed In 37623: Taxonomy: Don't pass results of 'count' query through 'get_terms' filter. Use of the 'get_terms' filter was consolidated in [37572], with the introduction of WP_Term_Query. At that time, the result of 'count=true' queries began being filte
(James Bruce) 2016-08-07 09:31:26 UTC #1 Since upgrading my version of Java to the official JDK, I'm hitting an error with one of my scripts and it's filling my debug log. The pertinent bit seems to be this: 2016-08-07 10:25:00.530 [ERROR] [.o.m.r.i.engine.ExecuteRuleJob] - Error during the execution of rule Humidity Monitor java.lang.RuntimeException: The name '