Createdb Database Creation Failed Error Must Be Member Of Role
Contents |
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies postgres must be member of role of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business
Must Be Owner Of Extension Plpgsql
Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges rds postgres create database Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute:
Rds Superuser
Sign up “ERROR: must be member of role” When creating schema in PostgreSQL up vote 15 down vote favorite 3 I'm logged in with a superuser account and this is the process I'm doing: 1-> CREATE ROLE test WITH IN ROLE testroles PASSWORD 'testpasswd' 2-> CREATE SCHEMA AUTHORIZATION test The role is correctly created but I'm getting this error when trying to create error: unrecognized configuration parameter "row_security" the Schema: ERROR: must be member of role "test" Thanks in advance! postgresql share|improve this question asked Oct 31 '14 at 23:02 Ultranuke 162116 just go through postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/role-membership.html –wingedpanther Nov 1 '14 at 6:58 I'm still having the same problem, anyone can please help me? –Ultranuke Nov 8 '14 at 2:53 add a comment| 5 Answers 5 active oldest votes up vote 16 down vote Are you using RDS? Because I get the same issue when I log in as the "superuser" that they create for you. The way that I was able to fix this was to create a new group role that included my super user and the user who owned the schema. So for you this would mean adding your super user and test user to a new roles group: CREATE ROLE users NOSUPERUSER INHERIT NOCREATEDB NOCREATEROLE NOREPLICATION; GRANT megausers TO testroles; GRANT test TO testroles; Now you should be able to create your schmea share|improve this answer answered Jan 9 '15 at 15:45 bionicseraph 4371510 This is a bit confused, but I did use t
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow
Postgres Change Database Owner
the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack
Psql List Roles
Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of postgres role 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up How to solve privileges issues when restore PostgreSQL Database up vote 36 down vote favorite 7 I have http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26684643/error-must-be-member-of-role-when-creating-schema-in-postgresql dumped a clean, no owner backup for Postgres Database with the command pg_dump sample_database -O -c -U Later, when I restore the database with psql -d sample_database -U app_name However, I encountered several errors which prevents me from restoring the data: ERROR: must be owner of extension plpgsql ERROR: must be owner of schema public ERROR: schema "public" already exists ERROR: must be owner of schema public CREATE EXTENSION ERROR: must be http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13410631/how-to-solve-privileges-issues-when-restore-postgresql-database owner of extension plpgsql I digged into the plain-text SQL pg_dump generates and I found it contains SQL CREATE SCHEMA public; COMMENT ON SCHEMA public IS 'standard public schema'; CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS plpgsql WITH SCHEMA pg_catalog; COMMENT ON EXTENSION plpgsql IS 'PL/pgSQL procedural language'; I think the causes are that the user app_name doesn't have the privileges to alter the public schema and plpgsql. How could I solve this issue? postgresql database-backups rails-postgresql share|improve this question asked Nov 16 '12 at 4:48 steveyang 4,14543762 If you don't need plpgsql, then DROP EXTENSION plpgsql before you pg_dump. This is safer than making your app a super user, and it is more convenient than ignoring errors (which bombs if you use --single-transaction or -v ON_ERROR_STOP=1). This is a known issue, [discussed at length by the Postgres developers|postgresql.org/message-id/… but not fixed as of 9.3. –mehaase Jun 5 '15 at 21:16 add a comment| 4 Answers 4 active oldest votes up vote 29 down vote To solve the issue you must assign the proper ownership permissions. Try the below which should resolve all permission related issues for specific users but as stated in the comments this should not be used in production: root@server:/var/log/postgresql# sudo -u postgres psql psql (8.4.4) Type "help" for help. postgres=# \
9.0 PostgreSQL 8.4.22 Documentation Prev Fast Backward Chapter 20. Database Roles and Privileges Fast Forward Next 20.4. Role Membership It is frequently convenient to group users together to ease management https://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/role-membership.html of privileges: that way, privileges can be granted to, or revoked from, a group as a whole. In PostgreSQL this is done by creating a role that represents the group, and then granting membership in the group role to individual user roles. To set up a group role, first create the role: CREATE ROLE name; Typically a role being used as a group would not have the LOGIN attribute, though must be you can set it if you wish. Once the group role exists, you can add and remove members using the GRANT and REVOKE commands: GRANT group_role TO role1, ... ; REVOKE group_role FROM role1, ... ; You can grant membership to other group roles, too (since there isn't really any distinction between group roles and non-group roles). The database will not let you set up circular membership loops. Also, it is must be member not permitted to grant membership in a role to PUBLIC. The members of a role can use the privileges of the group role in two ways. First, every member of a group can explicitly do SET ROLE to temporarily "become" the group role. In this state, the database session has access to the privileges of the group role rather than the original login role, and any database objects created are considered owned by the group role not the login role. Second, member roles that have the INHERIT attribute automatically have use of privileges of roles they are members of. As an example, suppose we have done: CREATE ROLE joe LOGIN INHERIT; CREATE ROLE admin NOINHERIT; CREATE ROLE wheel NOINHERIT; GRANT admin TO joe; GRANT wheel TO admin; Immediately after connecting as role joe, a database session will have use of privileges granted directly to joe plus any privileges granted to admin, because joe "inherits" admin's privileges. However, privileges granted to wheel are not available, because even though joe is indirectly a member of wheel, the membership is via admin which has the NOINHERIT attribute. After: SET ROLE admin; the session would have use of only those privileges granted to admin, and not those granted to joe. After: SET ROLE wheel; the