Example Sources Of Error
Contents |
the measurement devices (hard to read scales, etc.) - Usually caused by poorly or miscalibrated instruments. - There are usually ways to determine or estimate. - Cannot reduce by repeated measurements, but can account for in some way. 3. Indeterminate sources of error in a chemistry lab (Random) Errors
- Natural variations in measurements. - May be result of operator sources of error in physics bias, variation in experimental conditions, or other factors not easily accounted for. - May be minimized by repeated measurement and using an averageSource Of Error Definition
value. Experimental results may be described in terms of precision and accuracy. Precision - relatively low indeterminate error.
- reproducibility. - high precision means a number of readings or trials result in values close toTypes Of Sources Of Error
the same number.
Accuracy - relatively low determinate error. - close to a true value. Accurate and precise Precise but not accurate Reliability- a procedure is said to be reliable if it may be completed with a high degree of accuracy and precision. For most of our investigations we will be concerned with the precision of results. Experimental Data and Measures of Uncertainty Quantities that give some measure of experimental precision are Deviation sources of error in measurement (individual values) Average deviation Average Deviation of the Mean (Standard Average Deviation) Sample standard deviation (sometimes denoted as ) Standard error It is customary to report experimental results with an uncertainty in the following form Result = Average ± uncertainty The uncertainty is one of the measures of precision given above (a.d., A.D., s, or Sx). For our present cases we will use standard error and report results as Result = Average ± Sx This information is simply preliminary to analyses we will be performing on some sample data, and data we will collect in the future. The idea here is to give you the formulae that are used to describe the precision of a set of data. We will see a bit more later. We need to see a calculation of these quantities. These pages illustrate one run through of calculations Another document will be about what these statistical quantities might tell us and how we might use this information to make certain decisions (usually as concerns elimination of data.) Reading Instruments and Errors Recorded values should reflect the precision of an instrument. Recorded values should have at least one more place than the smallest division on the scale of the instrument. Readings from a meter stick with major divisions (numbered divisions) of cm, that has each mm marked, would be reported to 0.01cm. EstimaHelp Suggestions Send Feedback Answers Home All Categories Arts & Humanities Beauty & Style Business & Finance Cars & Transportation Computers & Internet Consumer Electronics Dining Out Education & Reference Entertainment & Music Environment Family & Relationships Food & Drink Games & Recreation Health Home & Garden Local Businesses
Sources Of Error In A Biology Lab
News & Events Pets Politics & Government Pregnancy & Parenting Science & examples of experimental errors Mathematics Social Science Society & Culture Sports Travel Yahoo Products International Argentina Australia Brazil Canada France Germany India Indonesia sources of errors in english language Italy Malaysia Mexico New Zealand Philippines Quebec Singapore Taiwan Hong Kong Spain Thailand UK & Ireland Vietnam Espanol About About Answers Community Guidelines Leaderboard Knowledge Partners Points & Levels Blog Safety Tips http://www.ahsd.org/science/stroyan/hphys/stats/meas_uncert_1.htm Education & Reference Homework Help Next What are possible sources of error in an experiment? My experiment is on testing nutrients in solutions, using test tubes and hot water baths, i need two sources of error, thanks:) 3 following 5 answers 5 Report Abuse Are you sure you want to delete this answer? Yes No Sorry, something has gone wrong. Trending Now Mia https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090707145338AAaUiOa Goth Tyler Perry Felicity Jones Philadelphia Eagles Halloween Costumes iPhone 7 Scarlett Johansson Auto Insurance Quotes Natalie Portman Griffith Stadium Answers Relevance Rating Newest Oldest Best Answer: Incomplete definition (may be systematic or random) - One reason that it is impossible to make exact measurements is that the measurement is not always clearly defined. For example, if two different people measure the length of the same rope, they would probably get different results because each person may stretch the rope with a different tension. The best way to minimize definition errors is to carefully consider and specify the conditions that could affect the measurement. Failure to account for a factor (usually systematic) - The most challenging part of designing an experiment is trying to control or account for all possible factors except the one independent variable that is being analyzed. For instance, you may inadvertently ignore air resistance when measuring free-fall acceleration, or you may fail to account for the effect of the Earth's magnetic field when measuring the field of a small magnet. The best way to account for these sources of error is to brai
of this type result in measured values that are consistently too high or consistently too low. Systematic errors may be of four kinds: 1. Instrumental. http://www.physics.nmsu.edu/research/lab110g/html/ERRORS.html For example, a poorly calibrated instrument such as a thermometer that reads http://academics.wellesley.edu/Chemistry/chem211lab/Orgo_Lab_Manual/Appendix/experimental_error.html 102 oC when immersed in boiling water and 2 oC when immersed in ice water at atmospheric pressure. Such a thermometer would result in measured values that are consistently too high. 2. Observational. For example, parallax in reading a meter scale. 3. Environmental. For example, of error an electrical power ìbrown outî that causes measured currents to be consistently too low. 4. Theoretical. Due to simplification of the model system or approximations in the equations describing it. For example, if your theory says that the temperature of the surrounding will not affect the readings taken when it actually does, then this factor will introduce a sources of error source of error. Random Errors Random errors are positive and negative fluctuations that cause about one-half of the measurements to be too high and one-half to be too low. Sources of random errors cannot always be identified. Possible sources of random errors are as follows: 1. Observational. For example, errors in judgment of an observer when reading the scale of a measuring device to the smallest division. 2. Environmental. For example, unpredictable fluctuations in line voltage, temperature, or mechanical vibrations of equipment. Random errors, unlike systematic errors, can often be quantified by statistical analysis, therefore, the effects of random errors on the quantity or physical law under investigation can often be determined. Example to distinguish between systematic and random errors is suppose that you use a stop watch to measure the time required for ten oscillations of a pendulum. One source of error will be your reaction time in starting and stopping the watch. During one measurement you may start early and stop late; on the next you may rev
due to inherent limitations in the measuring equipment, or of the measuring techniques, or perhaps the experience and skill of the experimenter. However mistakes do not count as part of the analysis, though it has to be said that some of the accounts given by students dwell too often on mistakes – blunders, let's not be coy – and too seldom on the quantitative assessment of error. Perhaps it's easier to do so, but it is not quantitative and does not present much of a test of the quality of the results. The development of the skill of error assessment is the purpose of these pages. They are not intended as a course in statistics, so there is nothing concerning the analysis of large amounts of data. The Origin Errors – or uncertainties in experimental data – can arise in numerous ways. Their quantitative assessment is necessary since only then can a hypothesis be tested properly. The modern theory of atomic structure is believed because it quantitatively predicted all sorts of atomic properties; yet the experiments used to determine them were inevitably subject to uncertainty, so that there has to be some set of criteria that can be used to decide whether two compared quantities are the same or not, or whether a particular reading truly belongs to a set of readings. Melting point results from a given set of trials is an example of the latter. Blunders (mistakes). Mistakes (or the much stronger 'blunder') such as, dropping a small amount of solid on the balance pan, are not errors in the sense meant in these pages. Unfortunately many critiques of investigations written by students are fond of quoting blunders as a source of error, probably because they're easy to think of. They are neither quantitative nor helpful; experimental error in the true sense of uncertainty cannot be assessed if the experimenter was simply unskilled. Human error. This is often confused with blunders, but is rather different – though one person's human error is another's blunder, no doubt. Really it hinges on the experimenter doing the experiment truly to the best of his ability, but being let down by inexperience. Such errors lessen with practice. They also do not help in the quantitative assessment of error. An example of this would be transferring solids from the weighing boats to a test tube Only if the human error has a significant impact on the experiment should the student mention it. Instrumental limitations. Uncertainties are inherent in any measuring instrum