On Error Resume Next Try Catch
Contents |
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers on error resume next vba or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x
Try Catch Vba
Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 6.2 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it on error goto line only takes a minute: Sign up What is the best alternative “On Error Resume Next” for C#? up vote 12 down vote favorite 2 If I put empty catch blocks for my C# code, is it going to be an on error exit sub equivalent for VB.NET's "On Error Resume Next" statement. try { C# code; } catch(exception) { } The reason I am asking this is because I have to convert a VB.NET code to C#, and the old code has ~200 "On Error Resume Next" statements although I am using a proper try {} catch {} in my new code, but is there is a better alternative? c# vb.net error-handling vb.net-to-c# share|improve this question edited Oct 25 '12 at 16:11 Peter Mortensen 10.3k1369107
Vba Error Handling Best Practices
asked Jan 28 '11 at 6:15 Neel 67621026 12 The lack of an alternative to On Error Resume Next wasn't just an unintentional oversight... Why do you possibly need this? If you explain the motivation behind your thoughts of doing this, I'm sure that someone here could give you a better solution. –Cody Gray Jan 28 '11 at 6:17 @Cody Gray - updated the reason of asking. Thanks –Neel Jan 28 '11 at 6:31 2 @MarkJ: Because even if (s)he leaves the code as VB.NET, it's still a good idea to replace On Error Goto Next with more structured exception handling (or none at all). –Cody Gray Jan 29 '11 at 2:04 4 @Cody It is an improvement to replace the error handling, but you have to assess how long it will take (how much it will cost) and whether the code needs substantial modifications. If the code works & doesn't need changing, there may be better things to do with the time instead. –MarkJ Jan 29 '11 at 14:21 1 @MarkJ: Fair enough. I don't disagree with you, I was just providing what I felt was a convincing argument for the other side. This is one of those design decisions you have to make. Do I stick with sloppy code that happens to work, or do I take the time to improve it for long-term benefits. I was assuming the reason th
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us on error goto 0 Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers vba on error goto 0 or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack
Vba Error Handling In Loop
Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 6.2 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Continue Code after Exception up vote 5 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4825422/what-is-the-best-alternative-on-error-resume-next-for-c down vote favorite 1 I would like to know if there is a way to let the program continue after an exception is thrown. For example: Try line 1 line 2 line 3 line 4 ( here the exception is thrown and jumps to the catch) line 5 <-- i would like the program to continue its execution loging the error line 6 Catch ex as Exception http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3366635/continue-code-after-exception log(ex.tostring) End Try Thanks. vb.net exception-handling share|improve this question edited Nov 13 '12 at 12:56 gabsferreira 1,45941848 asked Jul 29 '10 at 20:24 carlos 3832623 add a comment| 8 Answers 8 active oldest votes up vote 8 down vote accepted If you're doing something that you know how to recover from or that isn't vital, you're supposed to wrap just that line in the try/catch with a specific catch. e.g. Try line 1 line 2 line 3 Try line 4 ( here the exception is throw and jumps to the catch) Catch iox as IOException ' or whatever type is being thrown 'log it End Try line 5 <-- i would like the program to continue its execution after loggin the error line 6 Catch ex as Exception log(ex.tostring) End Try share|improve this answer edited Nov 13 '12 at 13:01 gabsferreira 1,45941848 answered Jul 29 '10 at 20:36 Nikki9696 4,3241618 add a comment| up vote 5 down vote Use 'Continue For' Not good practice everywhere, but useful in some circumstances, e.g. find a file while handling denied access to certain directories: Dim dir As New DirectoryInfo("C:\") Dim strSearch As String = ("boot.ini") For Each SubDir As DirectoryInfo In di
Forum Visual Basic Programming Visual Basic .NET Alternative for "On Error Resume Next" in VB.NEt If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. http://forums.codeguru.com/showthread.php?398008-Alternative-for-quot-On-Error-Resume-Next-quot-in-VB-NEt You may have to register or Login before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. Results 1 to 14 of 14 Thread: Alternative for "On Error Resume Next" in VB.NEt Tweet Thread Tools Show Printable Version Email this Page… Subscribe to this Thread… Display Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode on error August 23rd, 2006,07:03 AM #1 rahulvasanth View Profile View Forum Posts Member Join Date Sep 2004 Posts 265 Alternative for "On Error Resume Next" in VB.NEt Hi I was using "On Error Resume Next" in VB to avoid certain errors. I want to know the equivalent of "On Error Resume Next" in VB.Net. Thanking in advance Reply With Quote August 23rd, 2006,07:30 AM #2 Kevin McFarlane View Profile View Forum Posts Member Join Date on error goto Jun 1999 Posts 153 Re: Alternative for "On Error Resume Next" in VB.NEt There isn't any. Kevin Reply With Quote August 23rd, 2006,07:35 AM #3 HanneSThEGreaT View Profile View Forum Posts CG Bouncer Power Poster Join Date Jul 2001 Location Sunny South Africa Posts 11,223 Re: Alternative for "On Error Resume Next" in VB.NEt Try and Catch blocks would be the more prefferred and appropriate way of Error handling Rahul. have a look at these FAQ's, Exception Handling is covered there as well : http://www.codeguru.com/forum/showthread.php?t=368148 More specifically, here's the link to the Exception Handling FAQ : http://www.codeguru.com/forum/showthread.php?t=383057 Hope it helps! All my Articles Hannes Reply With Quote August 23rd, 2006,07:37 AM #4 rahulvasanth View Profile View Forum Posts Member Join Date Sep 2004 Posts 265 Re: Alternative for "On Error Resume Next" in VB.NEt In VB.NEt How can I continue execution even if an exception occurs. (I don't want the exception to be displayed on the screen). The application should continue executing the next line of code. Thanking in advance Reply With Quote August 23rd, 2006,07:38 AM #5 HanneSThEGreaT View Profile View Forum Posts CG Bouncer Power Poster Join Date Jul 2001 Location Sunny South Africa Posts 11,223 Re: Alternative for "On Error Resume Next" in VB.NEt Did you read my previous post in this Thread, post