Oracle Error 9279
Contents |
and other
Ora -00936 Error In Oracle
troubleshooting information in these books. List of Message Types oracle error codes list with description ORA-00000 to ORA-00899 ORA-00900 to ORA-01499 ORA-01500 to ORA-02099 ORA-02100 to ORA-04099 ORA-04100 to oracle error sqlcode ORA-07499 ORA-07500 to ORA-09857 ORA-09858 to ORA-12299 ORA-12300 to ORA-12399 ORA-12400 to ORA-12699 ORA-12700 to ORA-19399 ORA-19400 to ORA-24279 ORA-24280 to ORA-29249
Oracle 11g Error Codes
ORA-29250 to ORA-32799 ORA-32800 to ORA-32999 ORA-33000 to ORA-65535 BFILE-Related Messages (LFI) DBNEWID Messages (NID) DBVERIFY Messages (DBV) Export Messages (EXP) External Naming Messages (NNF) External Tables Messages (KUP) Import Messages (IMP) interMedia Audio Messages (AUD) interMedia Image Messages (IMG) interMedia Video Messages (VID) Network
Oracle Error Codes Table
Security Messages (NZE) Object Type Translator Initialization Messages (O2I) Object Type Translator Type File Messages (O2F) Object Type Translator Unparser Messages (O2U) Oracle Names Client Messages (NNC) Oracle Names Control Utility Messages (NNL) Oracle Names Server Messages (NNO) Oracle Names Server Network Presentation Layer Messages (NPL) Oracle Net Messages (TNS) Oracle OLAP Catalog Metadata Messages (AMD) Oracle Text Messages (DRG) Oracle Trace Collection Services Messages (EPC) Parameter Messages (LCD) Parameter Messages (LRM) PCF FIPS Messages (PCF) PL/SQL and FIPS Messages (PLS) Pro*C/C++ Messages (PCC) Pro*COBOL Messages (PCB) Recovery Manager Messages (RMAN) Remote Operation Messages (NCR) Simple Network Management Protocol Messages (NMP) SQL Runtime Messages (SQL) SQL*Module Messages (MOD) Summary Advisor, Explain Rewrite, and Explain Materialized View Messages (QSM) XML Parser Messages (LPX) XML Schema Processor Messages (LSX) Copyright © 2016, Oracle. All rights reserved.
for PGA - part 2: Oracle 11.2 This is the second part of a series of blogpost on Oracle database PGA usage. See the first part here. The first part described SGA and PGA usage, their distinction oracle error codes and solution (SGA being static, PGA being variable), the problem (no limitation for PGA allocations outside
Oracle Error Codes Pdf
of sort, hash and bitmap memory), a resolution for Oracle 12 (PGA_AGGREGATE_LIMIT), and some specifics about that (it doesn't look like ora in oracle a very hard limit). But this leaves out Oracle version 11.2. In reality, the vast majority of the database that I deal with at the time of writing is at version 11.2, and my http://www.oracle.com/pls/db92/db92.error_search?prefill=ORA- guess is that this is not just the databases I deal with, but a general tendency. This could change in the coming time with the desupport of Oracle 11.2, however I suspect the installed base of Oracle version 12 to increase gradually and smoothly instead of in a big bang. With version 11.2 there's no PGA_AGGREGATE_LIMIT. This simply means there is no official way to limit the PGA. Full stop. https://fritshoogland.wordpress.com/2014/12/16/oracle-database-operating-system-memory-allocation-management-for-pga-part-2-oracle-11-2/ However, there is an undocumented event to limit PGA usage: event 10261. This means that if you want to use this in a production database, you should ask Oracle support to bless the usage of it. On the other hand, Oracle corporation made this event public in an official white paper: Exadata consolidation best practices. Let's test event 10261! I've got the same table (T2) setup, a description how to set this up, and the anonymous PL/SQL code to allocate PGA using a collection is in the first part. I am using a database version 11.2.0.4 with PSU 4 applied. The reason for choosing this version is that if you run a serious business on Oracle 11.2, THAT should be the version you should be running on! (disclaimer: everything shown in this blogpost is purely for educational purposes. Do test everything thoroughly before applying this to a production system. Behaviour can or may be different in your specific situation) The reason for this disclaimer: Bernhard (@bdcbuning_gridit) tweeted that he was warned that when setting it at the instance level, it could crash the instance. I am not sure if this means setting it at runtime, this event is always evaluated at the instance level. Okay, let
Reporter: Wolfgang Weghorst Email Updates: Status: No Feedback Impact on me: None Category:MySQL Server: MyISAM storage engine https://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=9279 Severity:S2 (Serious) Version:4.1.10a OS:IBM AIX (AIX 5.2 Patchlevel 2) Assigned to: View Add Comment Files Developer Edit Submission View Progress Log Contributions [18 Mar 2005 13:45] Wolfgang Weghorst Description: We ware using MySql (4.1.10a, 32 bin) in conjunction with Bugzilla. The attachments-table has reached a somewhat magical size of 1023,9M. Further oracle error inserts into this table are immediately leading to an crash (corruption) of this table. Even after an Repair, the table crashes again. Checking the table in MySql-Admin gives the following messages: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Status checked for table kdtest_bugs2173.attachments. Table is marked as crashed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Status checked for table kdtest_bugs2173.attachments. Size of datafile oracle error codes is: 1073741312 Should be: 1074331452 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Status checked for table kdtest_bugs2173.attachments. Corrupt On our Test-System the same operation is possible: I have copied the table to our testsystem, and everything is okay. The Test-System in running with AIX 5.2 Pachlevel 4 and MySQL, (4.1.10a, 32 bin). There is more then sufficient space on both machines. Do you have any advice or idea's related to our problem? Regards, Wolfgang Weghorst How to repeat: The bug can be repeated on our Production-System if we are inserting another row in the mentioned table. The table is in an fine condition before the insert-statement is executed. [24 Mar 2005 4:39] Jorge del Conde hi is there any way you can provide us with a test-case that reproduces this behaviour ? error 127 means that the record-file is crashed, and this could have happened because of many reasons. thanks [24 Apr 2005 23:00] Bugs System No f