Print Error Message In Pl/sql
Contents |
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the oracle sqlerrm workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about
Pl Sql Sqlcode
Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions oracle sql error code Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 6.2 million programmers, just like you, helping each other.
Oracle Sqlcode List
Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up How to catch and return (or print) an exception in an ORACLE PL/SQL create or replace stored procedure up vote 8 down vote favorite 1 I have a PL/SQL stored procedure inside which I want to run several updates, then capture any exceptions and return them in an out parameter. oracle raise exception with message For simplicitys sake in the code block below I am simply outputting the exception code and error message to the console. However, the code block below does not work (I am experiencing a "found / expecting" syntax error) CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE DBP.TESTING_SP AS DECLARE v_code NUMBER; v_errm VARCHAR2(64); BEGIN UPDATE PS_NE_PHONE_TBL SET NE_PHONE_TYPE = 'TEST' WHERE NEMPLID_TBL = 'N14924'; EXCEPTION WHEN OTHERS THEN v_code := SQLCODE; v_errm := SUBSTR(SQLERRM, 1, 64); DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE (v_code || ' ' || v_errm); END TESTING_SP; / What is the correct syntax for what I am trying to do? I read on one forum "When using the Create or Replace syntax, you can not use Declare. Declare is only for anonymous blocks that are not named. So either remove line 1 and create an anonymous block, or remove line 2 and create a named procedure." but I'm not sure how to create an anonymous block or create a named procedure to accomplish what I want to do (if that, indeed, is the 'solution'). Could somebody lend a hand? oracle
to your PL/SQL program. With many programming languages, unless you disable error checking, a run-time error such as stack overflow or division by zero stops normal processing and returns control
Oracle Sql Codes List
to the operating system. With PL/SQL, a mechanism called exception handling lets you
Functions For Error Trapping Are Contained In Which Section Of A Pl/sql Block
bulletproof your program so that it can continue operating in the presence of errors. This chapter contains these topics: oracle sqlcode values Overview of PL/SQL Runtime Error Handling Advantages of PL/SQL Exceptions Summary of Predefined PL/SQL Exceptions Defining Your Own PL/SQL Exceptions How PL/SQL Exceptions Are Raised How PL/SQL Exceptions Propagate Reraising a PL/SQL Exception http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12327643/how-to-catch-and-return-or-print-an-exception-in-an-oracle-pl-sql-create-or-re Handling Raised PL/SQL Exceptions Overview of PL/SQL Compile-Time Warnings Overview of PL/SQL Runtime Error Handling In PL/SQL, an error condition is called an exception. Exceptions can be internally defined (by the runtime system) or user defined. Examples of internally defined exceptions include division by zero and out of memory. Some common internal exceptions have predefined names, such as ZERO_DIVIDE and STORAGE_ERROR. The other internal exceptions https://docs.oracle.com/cd/B19306_01/appdev.102/b14261/errors.htm can be given names. You can define exceptions of your own in the declarative part of any PL/SQL block, subprogram, or package. For example, you might define an exception named insufficient_funds to flag overdrawn bank accounts. Unlike internal exceptions, user-defined exceptions must be given names. When an error occurs, an exception is raised. That is, normal execution stops and control transfers to the exception-handling part of your PL/SQL block or subprogram. Internal exceptions are raised implicitly (automatically) by the run-time system. User-defined exceptions must be raised explicitly by RAISE statements, which can also raise predefined exceptions. To handle raised exceptions, you write separate routines called exception handlers. After an exception handler runs, the current block stops executing and the enclosing block resumes with the next statement. If there is no enclosing block, control returns to the host environment. For information on managing errors when using BULK COLLECT, see "Handling FORALL Exceptions with the %BULK_EXCEPTIONS Attribute". Example 10-1 calculates a price-to-earnings ratio for a company. If the company has zero earnings, the division operation raises the predefined exception ZERO_DIVIDE, the execution of the block is interrupted, and control is transferred to the exception handl
TECHNOLOGY: PL/SQL Tracing Lines By Steven Feuerstein Find and report your errors—by line number—in Oracle Database 10g. PL/SQL offers a powerful and flexible exception architecture. Of course, there is always room for improvement, and in Oracle Database 10g, http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/testcontent/o25plsql-093886.html exception handling takes a big step forward with the introduction of the DBMS_UTILITY.FORMAT_ERROR_BACKTRACE function. This article explores the problem that this function solves and how best to use it. Who Raised That Exception? When an exception http://psoug.org/reference/exception_handling.html is raised, one of the most important pieces of information a programmer would like to uncover is the line of code that raised the exception. Prior to Oracle Database 10g, one could obtain this information oracle sql only by allowing the exception to go unhandled. Let's revisit the error-handling behavior available to programmers in Oracle9i Database. Consider this simple chain of program calls in Listing 1: procedure proc3 calls proc2 calls proc1 , at which point proc1 raises the NO_DATA_FOUND exception. Notice that there is no error handling in any of the procedures; it is most significantly lacking in the top-level proc3 procedure. If I run proc3 in SQL*Plus, print error message I will see the following results: ERROR at line 1: ORA-01403: no data found ORA-06512: at "SCOTT.PROC1", line 4 ORA-06512: at "SCOTT.PROC2", line 6 ORA-06512: at "SCOTT.PROC3", line 4 ORA-06512: at line 3 Code Listing 1: A stack of procedures CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE proc1 IS BEGIN DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line ('running proc1'); RAISE NO_DATA_FOUND; END; / CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE proc2 IS l_str VARCHAR2(30) := 'calling proc1'; BEGIN DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line (l_str); proc1; END; / CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE proc3 IS BEGIN DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line ('calling proc2'); proc2; END; / This is the error trace dump of an unhandled exception, and it shows that the error was raised on line 4 of proc1. On the one hand, we should be very pleased with this behavior. Now that we have the line number, we can zoom right in on the problem code and fix it. On the other hand, we got this information by letting the exception go unhandled. In many applications, however, we work to avoid unhandled exceptions. Let's see what happens when I add an exception section to the proc3 procedure and then display the error information (the simplest form of error logging). Here is the second version of proc3 : CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE proc3 IS BEGIN DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line ('calling proc2'); proc2; EXCEPTION WHEN OTHERS THEN my_putline ( DBMS_
Functions PSOUG Forum Oracle Blogs Search the Reference Library pages: FreeOracle MagazineSubscriptionsand Oracle White Papers Oracle Exception Handling Version 11.1 General NOTE: How Oracle Does Implicit Rollbacks Before executing an INSERT, UPDATE, or DELETE statement, Oracle marks an implicit savepoint (unavailable to you). If the statement fails, Oracle rolls back to the savepoint. Normally, just the failed SQL statement is rolled back, not the whole transaction. However, if the statement raises an unhandled exception, the host environment determines what is rolled back. If you exit a stored subprogram with an unhandled exception, PL/SQL does not assign values to OUT parameters. Also, PL/SQL does not roll back database work done by the subprogram. At the level of the SQL*Plus prompt, every update/insert/delete has one implicit savepoint, and also the invocation of any unnamed block. Below that, the unnamed block itself has 'sub' savepoints - one foreach insert/update/delete statement in it, and one for each subprogram unit. And so on down the line. If an error occurs, and that error is handled at any level by the time we're back at the SQL*Plus prompt, we only rollback to the immediate savepoint at the start of the update/insert/delete that errors. Otherwise we rollback to the top-level 'virtual' savepoint currently in existence, which is my offending unnamed block. That is, a handled error is handled and so can be dealt with without rolling back all the way to the top. It is handled and the transaction proceeds. Commits define the end of a transaction (and start of a new one) - rollbacks only define the end of a transaction if they rollback to the last commit, rather than savepoint (whether explicit or implicit). I came to my 'version' from the following by no means exhaustive tests: CASE 1: I created a table a with one column, a1 number, and at the sqlplus prompt inserted a row with a1 = 1. I then ran that unnamed block I referred in an earlier post that, without an exception handler, does the following: INSERT INTO a VALUES (2); INSERT INTO a VALUES (3); INSERT INTO a VALUES ('a'); As expected I get an unhandled error on the last line. When I do a select for everything in the table a, I get the first row I inserted 'manually', the one with a1 = 1. So there seems to have been an invisible savepoint set just before the unnamed block ran. CASE 2: Then I modified the unnamed block so it did two good inserts and then called a stored procedure that did two good inserts and ended with one 'bad' - inserting a character into a number column. The stored procedure also had no error trap. When I run this one, as expec