Percent Error When Accepted Value Is 0
Contents |
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or percent error when theoretical value is zero posting ads with us Mathematics Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ Mathematics Stack Exchange
Percent Error = 0
is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a
Percent Error When Actual Value Is Zero
minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top How to calculate relative error when true value is zero? up vote 10
Percent Error When True Value Is 0
down vote favorite 3 How do I calculate relative error when the true value is zero? Say I have $x_{true} = 0$ and $x_{test}$. If I define relative error as: $\text{relative error} = \frac{x_{true}-x_{test}}{x_{true}}$ Then the relative error is always undefined. If instead I use the definition: $\text{relative error} = \frac{x_{true}-x_{test}}{x_{test}}$ Then the relative error is always 100%. Both methods seem useless. Is there another alternative? statistics share|cite|improve this question asked Feb 15 '14 at 22:41 okj 9511818 1 percent error when expected value is zero you need a maximum for that.. –Seyhmus Güngören Feb 15 '14 at 23:06 1 Simple and interesting question, indeed. Could you tell in which context you face this situation ? Depending on your answer, there are possible alternatives. –Claude Leibovici Feb 16 '14 at 6:24 1 @ClaudeLeibovici: I am doing a parameter estimation problem. I know the true parameter value ($x_{true}$), and I have simulation data from which I infer an estimate of the parameter ($x_{test}$). I want to quantify the error, and it seems that for my particular case relative error is more meaningful than absolute error. –okj Feb 17 '14 at 14:05 1 What about $\text{error} = 2 \frac{x_{true}-x_{test}}{x_{true}+x_{test}}$ if it is for an a posteriori analysis ? –Claude Leibovici Feb 17 '14 at 14:16 1 @okj. I am familiar with this situation. Either use the classical relative error and return $NaN$ if $x_{true}=0$ either adopt this small thing. It is always the same problem with that. You also can add a translation to the $x$'s to get rid of this. –Claude Leibovici Feb 17 '14 at 15:40 | show 4 more comments 4 Answers 4 active oldest votes up vote 5 down vote accepted First of all, let me precise that I am not a statistician but a physicist very concerned by numerical issues in particular in the area of fitting data to models. So, first consider that you have $[X(i),
Help Suggestions Send Feedback Answers Home All Categories Arts & Humanities Beauty & Style Business & Finance Cars & Transportation Computers & Internet Consumer Electronics Dining Out Education & Reference Entertainment & Music Environment Family & Relationships Food & Drink Games & Recreation Health Home & Garden Local Businesses News & Events Pets Politics & Government Pregnancy & Parenting Science & Mathematics Social relative error when true value is zero Science Society & Culture Sports Travel Yahoo Products International Argentina Australia Brazil Canada France Germany can percent error be zero India Indonesia Italy Malaysia Mexico New Zealand Philippines Quebec Singapore Taiwan Hong Kong Spain Thailand UK & Ireland Vietnam Espanol About About Answers relative error zero denominator Community Guidelines Leaderboard Knowledge Partners Points & Levels Blog Safety Tips Science & Mathematics Mathematics Next Percent error when the true value is 0? The formula for calculating percent error is (estimated value - true value) / true http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/677852/how-to-calculate-relative-error-when-true-value-is-zero value * 100. My estimated value is 0.1 while the true value is 0, which would give me (0.1 - 0) / 0 * 100. Since dividing by 0 is impossible, how can i find the percent error? Thank you!! 1 following 4 answers 4 Report Abuse Are you sure you want to delete this answer? Yes No Sorry, something has gone wrong. Trending Now Philip Rivers Billy Bush Gabrielle Union Diane Kruger Shania Twain 2016 Crossovers https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20091020201824AAD8K12 Truman Capote Auto Insurance Quotes Samsung Galaxy Dating Sites Answers Relevance Rating Newest Oldest Best Answer: There isn't one in this case. Percent error is undefined when the denominator is zero. It's just a case where the concept of percent error isn't useful. Source(s): elifino · 7 years ago 0 Thumbs up 1 Thumbs down Comment Add a comment Submit · just now Asker's rating Report Abuse Certainly you end up dividing by zero, you cannot calculate percent error when the true value is zero. I think the idea is that you should have any error when measuring a quantity of zero. It's hard to make a measurement mistake if you have zero of the unit! To be honest, I had never considered this before, so thank you! Tim · 7 years ago 0 Thumbs up 0 Thumbs down Comment Add a comment Submit · just now Report Abuse it is normally going to be a low percent error under those circumstances. Normally the methods of measurement are in the text book. 3012345678 · 7 years ago 1 Thumbs up 0 Thumbs down Comment Add a comment Submit · just now Report Abuse you can't its either a trick question or a typo. division yields an infinitely large number. Youll learn that as you progress in mathematics. Source(s): 40 years engineering Midgarder · 7 years ago 0 Thumbs up
Life in the Universe Labs Foundational Labs Observational Labs Advanced Labs Origins of Life in the Universe Labs Introduction to Color Imaging Properties of http://astro.physics.uiowa.edu/ITU/glossary/percent-error-formula/ Exoplanets General Astronomy Telescopes Part 1: Using the Stars Tutorials Aligning and Animating Images Coordinates in MaxIm Fits Header Graphing in Maxim Image Calibration in Maxim Importing Images into MaxIm Importing Images into Rspec Measuring Magnitude in Maxim Observing with Rigel Photometry in Maxim Producing Color Images Stacking Images Using SpectraSuite Software Using Tablet Applications Using the Rise percent error and Set Calculator on Rigel Wavelength Calibration in Rspec Glossary Kepler's Third Law Significant Figures Percent Error Formula Small-Angle Formula Stellar Parallax Finder Chart Iowa Robotic Telescope Sidebar[Skip] Glossary Index Kepler's Third LawSignificant FiguresPercent Error FormulaSmall-Angle FormulaStellar ParallaxFinder Chart Percent Error Formula When you calculate results that are aiming for known values, the percent error formula is useful percent error when tool for determining the precision of your calculations. The formula is given by: The experimental value is your calculated value, and the theoretical value is your known value. A percentage very close to zero means you are very close to your targeted value, which is good. It is always necessary to understand the cause of the error, such as whether it is due to the imprecision of your equipment, your own estimations, or a mistake in your experiment.Example: The 17th century Danish astronomer, Ole Rømer, observed that the periods of the satellites of Jupiter would appear to fluctuate depending on the distance of Jupiter from Earth. The further away Jupiter was, the longer the satellites would take to appear from behind the planet. In 1676, he determined that this phenomenon was due to the fact that the speed of light was finite, and subsequently estimated its velocity to be approximately 220,000 km/s. The current accepted value of the speed of light is almost 299,800 km/s. What was the percent error of Rømer's estimate