Percent Error When Theoretical Value Is 0
Contents |
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or percent error when actual value is zero posting ads with us Mathematics Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ Mathematics Stack Exchange
Percent Error = 0
is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a percent error when true value is 0 minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top How to calculate relative error when true value is zero? up vote 10 down percent error when expected value is zero vote favorite 3 How do I calculate relative error when the true value is zero? Say I have $x_{true} = 0$ and $x_{test}$. If I define relative error as: $\text{relative error} = \frac{x_{true}-x_{test}}{x_{true}}$ Then the relative error is always undefined. If instead I use the definition: $\text{relative error} = \frac{x_{true}-x_{test}}{x_{test}}$ Then the relative error is always 100%. Both methods seem useless. Is there another alternative? statistics share|cite|improve this question asked Feb 15 '14 at 22:41 okj 9511818 1 you
How To Calculate Relative Error When True Value Is Zero?
need a maximum for that.. –Seyhmus Güngören Feb 15 '14 at 23:06 1 Simple and interesting question, indeed. Could you tell in which context you face this situation ? Depending on your answer, there are possible alternatives. –Claude Leibovici Feb 16 '14 at 6:24 1 @ClaudeLeibovici: I am doing a parameter estimation problem. I know the true parameter value ($x_{true}$), and I have simulation data from which I infer an estimate of the parameter ($x_{test}$). I want to quantify the error, and it seems that for my particular case relative error is more meaningful than absolute error. –okj Feb 17 '14 at 14:05 1 What about $\text{error} = 2 \frac{x_{true}-x_{test}}{x_{true}+x_{test}}$ if it is for an a posteriori analysis ? –Claude Leibovici Feb 17 '14 at 14:16 1 @okj. I am familiar with this situation. Either use the classical relative error and return $NaN$ if $x_{true}=0$ either adopt this small thing. It is always the same problem with that. You also can add a translation to the $x$'s to get rid of this. –Claude Leibovici Feb 17 '14 at 15:40 | show 4 more comments 4 Answers 4 active oldest votes up vote 5 down vote accepted First of all, let me precise that I am not a statistician but a physicist very concerned by numerical issues in particular in the area of fitting data to models. So, first consider that you have $[X(i),Y(i)]$ data
a more professional manner and also make your lab reports easier for the TAs to grade. Here we list many of the more common mistakes made in the writing of lab reports (and other technical literature can percent error be zero as well). Remember this guiding principle: even though you as an engineer may understand thoroughly posteriori analysis what you have done, this is of no practical value unless you can communicate that knowledge to others. Imagine that you are
Relative Error Calculator
writing your report for a technically literate person who does not know what you did or why. Graphs A first major error is that many graphs do not present data effectively. In order to make an effective http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/677852/how-to-calculate-relative-error-when-true-value-is-zero graph, you should follow some standard conventions: Use either linear or log scales on both x and y axes. Many students used arbitrary scales or simple labelled their data points on the x and y axes. Standard scales make it easier to interpret a graph. Nonstandard scales make data hard to decipher. Make your graphs at least 7.5 cm (three inches) tall and 10cm (four inches) wide to ensure clarity. Smaller graphs hide smaller http://ecee.colorado.edu/ecen4634/labreports.htm variations in the data; computer-generated graphs are great but not necessary. Label all axes and traces. Also, do not put more than two traces on a graph unless you are trying to show a progression of data. If there are two traces or more on a graph, use different marks for the data points; i.e. x's for trace one, o's for trace two, etc. Use two or more colors for the traces if practical. Tables Another weakness in lab reports is the style of tables used. Use a vertical table (an independent variable column next to the dependent variable columns) whenever you have the numerical data available. Please do not use horizontal tables; they are very hard to read and thus do not present your data effectively. Use your ruler to organize your tables and make them easier to read. Error Analysis Writing: "...the measurements agree pretty well with the expected values..." does not mean a thing. It is important to do good error analysis. Usually, this should be done by calculating percent error: % error = 100 (Value obtained - Value expected) / (Value expected) The only exception to this is if the expected (theoretical) value is close to zero, so that the percent error goes to infinity. In such cases, use the absolute error: error = Value obtai
Life in the Universe Labs Foundational Labs Observational Labs Advanced Labs Origins of Life in the Universe Labs Introduction to Color Imaging Properties of Exoplanets General Astronomy Telescopes http://astro.physics.uiowa.edu/ITU/glossary/percent-error-formula/ Part 1: Using the Stars Tutorials Aligning and Animating Images Coordinates in MaxIm Fits Header Graphing in Maxim Image Calibration in Maxim Importing Images into MaxIm Importing Images into Rspec http://www.ajdesigner.com/phppercenterror/percent_error_actual.php Measuring Magnitude in Maxim Observing with Rigel Photometry in Maxim Producing Color Images Stacking Images Using SpectraSuite Software Using Tablet Applications Using the Rise and Set Calculator on Rigel Wavelength Calibration percent error in Rspec Glossary Kepler's Third Law Significant Figures Percent Error Formula Small-Angle Formula Stellar Parallax Finder Chart Iowa Robotic Telescope Sidebar[Skip] Glossary Index Kepler's Third LawSignificant FiguresPercent Error FormulaSmall-Angle FormulaStellar ParallaxFinder Chart Percent Error Formula When you calculate results that are aiming for known values, the percent error formula is useful tool for determining the precision of your calculations. The formula is percent error when given by: The experimental value is your calculated value, and the theoretical value is your known value. A percentage very close to zero means you are very close to your targeted value, which is good. It is always necessary to understand the cause of the error, such as whether it is due to the imprecision of your equipment, your own estimations, or a mistake in your experiment.Example: The 17th century Danish astronomer, Ole Rømer, observed that the periods of the satellites of Jupiter would appear to fluctuate depending on the distance of Jupiter from Earth. The further away Jupiter was, the longer the satellites would take to appear from behind the planet. In 1676, he determined that this phenomenon was due to the fact that the speed of light was finite, and subsequently estimated its velocity to be approximately 220,000 km/s. The current accepted value of the speed of light is almost 299,800 km/s. What was the percent error of Rømer's estimate?Solution:experimental value = 220,000 km/s = 2.2 x 108 m/stheoretical value = 299,800 km/s 2.998 x 108 m/s So Rømer was quite a bit of
this has two solution due to the absolute value in the percent error equation. However if percent error is equal to 100 percent or -100 percent, then there is only one calculated solution and one solution of infinity. The infinity comes from the division by zero. Percent error equation: Inputs: measured valuepercent error percent Conversions: measured value= 0 = 0 percent error= 0 = 0percent Solution 1: actual, accepted or true value= NOT CALCULATEDSolution 2: actual, accepted or true value= NOT CALCULATED Change Equation Variable Select to solve for a different unknown percent error calculatorRich internet application version of the percent error calculator. Solve for percent error Solve for the actual value. This is also called the accepted, experimental or true value.Note due to the absolute value in the actual equation (above) there are two value. Solve for the measured or observed value.Note due to the absolute value in the actual equation (above) there are two solutions. Change Equation to Percent Difference Solve for percent difference. Infant Growth Charts - Baby PercentilesTowing: Weight Distribution HitchPercent Off - Sale Discount CalculatorMortgage Calculator - Extra PaymentsSalary Hourly Pay Converter - JobsPaycheck Calculator - Overtime RatePay Raise Increase CalculatorLong Division CalculatorTemperature ConverterEngine Motor Horsepower CalculatorDog Age CalculatorSubwoofer Box CalculatorLinear Interpolation CalculatorPump Calculator - Water HydraulicsProjectile Motion CalculatorPresent Worth Calculator - FinanceDensity CalculatorTriangle CalculatorConstant Acceleration Motion PhysicsIdeal Gas Law CalculatorInterest Equations CalculatorTire Size Comparison CalculatorEarned Value Project ManagementCircle Equations CalculatorNumber of Days Between DatesMortgage Loan Calculator - FinanceStatistics Equations FormulasGrid Multiplication Common CoreLattice Multiplication Calculator Home: PopularIndex 1Index 2Index 3Index 4Infant ChartMath GeometryPhysics ForceFluid MechanicsFinanceLoan CalculatorNursing Math Was this page helpful? Share it. Online Web Apps, Rich Internet Application, Technical Tools, Specifications, How to Guides, Training, Applications, Examples, Tutorials, Reviews, Answers, Test Review Resources, Analysis, Homework Solutions, Worksheets, Help, Data and Informat