Quality Assurance And System Error
Contents |
Testing Testing Tools Selenium Definitions and Meaning: Error, Fault, Failure and Defect December 06 10:00 2011 by Nataliia Vasylyna Print This Article Many quality assurance definition people associate quality of a software system with a suggestion
Quality Assurance Vs Quality Control
that some software troubles are estimated to happen (or not). And in the case if such
Quality Control Techniques
troubles do occur, the negative influence is estimated to be minimal. Clue to the correctness perspective of software quality is in the concept of defect,
Quality Assurance Process
failure, fault, and error. Defect Commonly refers to several troubles with the software products, with its external behavior or with its internal features. Failure The incapacity of a system to conduct its required functions within clarified performance requirements. Fault A false, wrong step, process or data definition in a software product. software quality assurance Error A person act that generates an erroneous result. Consequently, the term failure refers to a behavioral deviation from the user wants or the product specification. Fault refers to an underlying condition within software that causes failure to happen. Error refers to a missing or wrong person action resulting in certain fault being injected into software. Errors also include error sources such as human misunderstandings, dissensions, misinterpretation and so on. Well, in literature failures, faults, and errors are together referred to as defects. Software troubles or defects are generally referred to as “software bugs”. Nevertheless, the term software bug is never exactly defined, such as the various aspects of defects defined as errors, faults, and failures above. Many people have also raised the moral or philosophical objection to the use of bug as evading amenability for something people committed. Related Posts:No Related Posts Article "tagged" as: interesting about software testingSoftware Bugssoftware testersoft
used quality assurance (QA) alternatives and techniques, including preventive actions, inspection, formal verification, testing, fault tolerance, and failure impact minimization. The generic ways to deal with defects, including prevention, detection and removal, qa testing and containment, are used as the basis to classify these QA alternatives. what is error in software testing Each QA alternative is then compared by its cost, applicability, and effectiveness over different product types and application environments. fp and lines of code are measure of Based on these, the author recommends an integrated approach for software quality assurance and improvement. Key words: defect, error removal, failure prevention and containment, fault detection and removal, QA alternatives and http://blog.qatestlab.com/2011/12/06/definitions-and-meaning-error-fault-failure-and-defect/ techniques INTRODUCTION With the pervasive use of software systems in modern society, the negative impact of software defects is also increasing. Consequently, one central activity for quality assurance (QA) is to ensure that few, if any, defects remain in the software when it is delivered to its customers or released to the market. Furthermore, one wants to ensure that, if possible, these remaining http://asq.org/pub/sqp/past/vol3_issue3/tian.html defects will cause minimal disruption or damage. Most modern software systems beyond limited personal use have become progressively larger and more complex because of the increased need for automation, functions, features, and services. It is nearly impossible to completely prevent or eliminate defects in such large complex systems. Instead, various QA alternatives and related techniques can be used in a concerted effort to effectively and efficiently assure their quality. Testing is among the most commonly performed QA activities for software. It detects execution problems so that underlying causes can be identified and fixed. Inspection, on the other hand, directly detects and corrects software problems without resorting to execution. Other QA alternatives, such as formal verification, defect prevention, and fault tolerance, deal with defects in their own ways. Close examination of how different QA alternatives deal with defects can help one better use them for specific applications. This article examines the generic ways to deal with defects and classifies QA alternatives accordingly. Existing QA alternatives are surveyed and then compared by their cost, applicability, and effectiveness under different application environments and for different product types. The arti
'Software Quality Assurance'? What is 'Software Testing'? What are some recent major computer system failures caused by software http://www.softwareqatest.com/qatfaq1.html bugs? Does every software project need testers? Why does software have bugs? How can new Software QA processes be introduced in an existing organization? What is verification? validation? What is a 'walkthrough'? What's an 'inspection'? What kinds of testing should be considered? What are 5 common problems in the software development process? What quality assurance are 5 common solutions to software development problems? What is software 'quality'? What is 'good code'? What is 'good design'? What is SEI? CMM? CMMI? ISO? Will it help? What is the 'software life cycle'? What is 'Software Quality Assurance'? Software QA involves the entire software development PROCESS - monitoring and improving quality assurance and the process, making sure that any agreed-upon processes, standards and procedures are followed, and ensuring that problems are found and dealt with. It is oriented to 'prevention'. (See the Bookstore section's 'Software QA' category for a list of useful books on Software Quality Assurance.) Return to top of this page's FAQ list What is 'Software Testing'? Testing involves operation of a system or application under controlled conditions and evaluating the results (e.g., 'if the user is in interface A of the application while using hardware B, and does C, then D should happen'). The controlled conditions should include both normal and abnormal conditions. Testing should intentionally attempt to make things go wrong to determine if things happen when they shouldn't or things don't happen when they should. It is oriented to 'detection'. (See the Bookstore section's 'Software Testing' category for a list of useful books on Software Testing.) Organizations vary considerably in how they assign responsibility