Read Error Rate Threshold 51
Contents |
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings raw read error rate 1 1 51 and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the read error rate crystaldiskinfo company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Super User Questions Tags Users Badges
Read Error Rate Fix
Unanswered Ask Question _ Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works:
Raw Read Error Rate Western Digital
Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top Can I modify the SMART value of Raw Read Error Rate Worst Value to be greater than 1? up vote 2 down vote favorite I have a HP Pavilion g6 2136tx Laptop which was functioning correctly until one day Windows 7 Ultimate read error rate 100 x64 couldn't boot up. Tried System Restore and Windows Startup Repair tool, both of which failed. Finally removed the HDD and connected it as external to another laptop. Tried many HDD Scan SW all of which could diagnose only 1 problem: Raw Read Error Rate: Threshold Value: 51, Current Value: 1, Worst Value: 1 All the softwares predicted imminent drive failure and that all data should be backed up. Hard Drive Model: Samsung Spinpoint ST500LM012 500GB manufactured by Seagate, 5400RPM The Date of manufacture is May 2012 and the drive has never failed ever. I removed all partitions and also did a deep format of the entire disk, but the error is still there. What are the options that I have except replacing the disk? Can I modify the SMART value of Raw Read Error Rate Worst Value to be greater than 1 as I saw many manufacturers allow it be greater than 1? Is it editable and if yes, how to do it? hard-drive smart share|improve this question edited Dec 17 '14 at 12:50 asked Dec 16 '14 at 10:19 John P
communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn
Read Error Rate 200
more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting raw read error rate fix ads with us Ask Ubuntu Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ Ask Ubuntu is a question and answer site raw read error rate 1 for Ubuntu users and developers. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to http://superuser.com/questions/853177/can-i-modify-the-smart-value-of-raw-read-error-rate-worst-value-to-be-greater-th the top How Do I interpret HDD S.M.A.R.T Results? up vote 40 down vote favorite 10 My laptop has recently started to become a bit unreliable, and for some reason I started to suspect that my HDD was starting to fail. After a bit of hunting on the internet, I found Ubuntu's Disk Utility in the System menu and ran the long SMART diagnostics from this. However, since the documentation for http://askubuntu.com/questions/20393/how-do-i-interpret-hdd-s-m-a-r-t-results Disk Utility is very poor (palimpsest?), I'm not sure how to interpret the results: For example, the Read Error Rate is over 50 million (!), yet the Assessment is rated "Good". So would someone mind explaining to me how to interpret the results of these tests (especially the Normalized, Worst, Threshold and Value numbers)? And maybe tell me what they think of the results I got for my HDD? (Thanks) hard-drive smart share|improve this question asked Jan 6 '11 at 23:46 Marty 78021015 Has the "Hardware ECC recovered" same value as "Read error rate"? My disk has 676 power cycles, was powered on 285 days, and has 193M errors. Compared to mine, your disk has way too much error, but I'm just speculating here. Anyways I just got worried myself o.O –danizmax Jan 7 '11 at 8:47 Yip - both numbers are the same! –Marty Jan 7 '11 at 16:32 add a comment| 3 Answers 3 active oldest votes up vote 32 down vote accepted You have a good description of how SMART works on the wikipedia. But a quick intro: Value: This is the raw value that the controller reports. Usually it's an easy to understand value (like power on hours or temperature),
All Hardware Benchmarks CPU Benchmarks Video Card Benchmarks Hard Drive Benchmarks RAM Benchmarks PC Systems Benchmarks Android Benchmarks iOS / iPhone Benchmarks Services Store Support Forums About Us Company Contact http://www.passmark.com/forum/general/614-raw-read-error-rate Us The Press Room Login or Sign Up Log in with Search in titles only Search in General only Advanced Search Search Forums New Topics Today's Posts Mark Channels Read Home Forum General If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: read error click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. Announcement Collapse No announcement yet. Raw Read Error Rate Collapse X Collapse Posts Latest Activity Search Page of 2 Filter Time All Time Today Last Week Last Month Show All Discussions only Photos only Videos only Links only read error rate Polls only Filtered by: Clear All new posts Previous 1 2 Next trance Junior Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 2 #1 Raw Read Error Rate 11-20-2006, 01:30 AM hello, I always check my disk with the Diskcheckup and HDtune, but last hour I had a really quick power cut off (about 2s with no power)... the computer reseted and then I did a scandisk (didnt find any problems) and checked again the SMART status. But this time I've noticed the Raw Value of Raw Read Error Rate attribute is 1. After this I desfragmented and did a surface scan on all partitions to see if the value raise, but it didnt change. I also noticed the Spin Up Time attribute has a lower value (normally 5504ms ~ 5568ms), but I dont care too much about this attribute, as the power quickly came, the disk was still spinning, so it took less time to speed up. Should I be worried about the Raw Read Error Rate Value or it was caused by the power cut off? I was running emule, IM, a