Catch Runtime Error Java
Contents |
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs c++ catch runtime error Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community python catch runtime error of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Java how to catch ALL run time
Vba Catch Runtime Error
errors up vote 0 down vote favorite I've built a socket server which logs all it proccesses in a text file. For now, the server runs in the background and has no UI. Is there a way for me to catch ALL run time errors
How To Handle Runtime Error In Qtp
(not just the ones throwing exeptions) include null pointers etc. and log it to a file for monitoring? java share|improve this question asked Oct 28 '12 at 6:45 Asaf Nevo 4,1931442100 2 What sort of run-time error doesn't throw an exception? Can you give a few examples? –Mankarse Oct 28 '12 at 6:46 You need to write the logging statements (according to your logger setting) to see what you want to see in your log file(s). –Bhesh Gurung Oct 28 '12 at 6:48 1 catch how to handle runtime exception in java example (RuntimeException re) catches all errors. –deleted_user Oct 28 '12 at 7:03 @Mankarse not all error make you use try/catch –Asaf Nevo Oct 28 '12 at 7:31 You could try having a look at ThreadGroup#uncaughtException –MadProgrammer Oct 28 '12 at 7:44 | show 1 more comment 2 Answers 2 active oldest votes up vote 1 down vote accepted Yes, it is simple to catch anything that can be thrown in Java. You just need to catch the base class of everything throwable: try { ... my code ... catch (Throwable t) { ... process it ... } A note on terminology: everything that can be thrown in Java is called an "exception", not only the exceptions extending from the Exception class. This is an unfortunate choice of class names, possibly due to a late decision in Java design to introduce a superclass to Exception. share|improve this answer edited Oct 28 '12 at 9:07 answered Oct 28 '12 at 7:15 Marko Topolnik 115k14146250 Late compared to what? On what evidence? –EJP Oct 28 '12 at 7:27 @EJP No evidence, it is my guess. If you have a better guess or evidence, please provide it for my education. –Marko Topolnik Oct 28 '12 at 8:48 but then i have to wrap all my code and classes inside that right ? –Asaf Nevo Oct 28 '12 at 11:46 I would hope you have a central place where you dispatch work from, like where you accept client requests. You need the catch only at that one place. &nda
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of
Why Is It Not Necessary To Handle Runtime Exception
this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn can we throw runtime exception in java more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question catch unchecked exception x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Handling http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13106930/java-how-to-catch-all-run-time-errors RuntimeExceptions in Java [closed] up vote 8 down vote favorite 4 Can anyone explain how to handle the Runtime Exceptions in Java? java exception-handling runtimeexception share|improve this question edited Nov 13 '15 at 9:22 Ripon Al Wasim 16.3k2187118 asked Jan 8 '10 at 15:50 Ravi K Chowdary 1,34042959 closed as too broad by Jason C, bjb568, user987339, gnat, Tomtom Nov 26 '14 at http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2028719/handling-runtimeexceptions-in-java 7:03 There are either too many possible answers, or good answers would be too long for this format. Please add details to narrow the answer set or to isolate an issue that can be answered in a few paragraphs.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question. I think the non-accepters of SO have figured out by now that those are empty threats. We want mod points! –danben Jan 8 '10 at 15:53 1 i never seen accept button anywhere ? –Ravi K Chowdary Jan 8 '10 at 16:00 It's the big tick / correction mark beside an answer. –Gordon Jan 8 '10 at 16:02 1 It's sad, but I have the impression that obvious 30-second answers to dumb questions usually give more reward points than well-written answers to more interesting questions. For questions with a high view rate, the first answer usually ends up with a lot of reward points even if it is not related to the question at all. –jarnbjo Jan 8 '10 at 16:03 sorry, i could n
New Topic programming forums Java Java JSRs Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Languages Frameworks Products This https://coderanch.com/t/366965/java/java/catch-Runtime-error Site Careers Other all forums Forum: Java in General How to https://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/essential/exceptions/runtime.html catch Runtime error Madhu Jannu Greenhorn Posts: 6 posted 15 years ago Below shown are the 3 classes, I developed. When I run ElementTest.java, I cannot see the output. I am unable to put it in debug also. I am using runtime error JBuilder tool for editing, compling & running the code. I am expecting it to print the error message "Trying to add duplicate Element" which was coded in file Element.java. But I think I am getting a runtime error. How do I know in which class I am getting that runtime error and what catch runtime error it is? Thank U. ----------------- File Element.java -------------------------- package testexamples; public class Element { private String name; public Element(String name) { this.name = name; } public String getName() { return name; } } ----------------- File Set.java -------------------------- package testexamples; import java.util.Vector; public class Set { private String name; private Vector elements; public Set(String name) { this.name = name; elements = new Vector(); } public void addElement(Element el) { if(! elements.contains( el )) { elements.addElement(el); } else { System.out.println(" Trying to add Duplicate Element:"+ el); } } } ----------------- File ElementTest.java ---------------------- package testexamples; import java.util.*; import java.io.*; public class ElementTest{ public ElementTest() { FileOutputStream fos = null; try { fos = new FileOutputStream("log.txt"); } catch (Exception e) { System.out.println(e); System.exit(1); } PrintStream ps = new PrintStream(fos); Element e1 = new Element("e1"); Element e2= new Element("e2"); Element e3= new Element("e3"); Element e4= new Element("e1"); Element e5= new Element("e2"); Set s1= new Set("s1"); Set s2= new Set("s2"); s1.addElement(e1); s1.addElement(e2); s1.addEleme
Catching and Handling Exceptions The try Block The catch Blocks The finally Block The try-with-resources Statement Putting It All Together Specifying the Exceptions Thrown by a Method How to Throw Exceptions Chained Exceptions Creating Exception Classes Unchecked Exceptions The Controversy Advantages of Exceptions Summary Questions and Exercises Trail: Essential Classes Lesson: Exceptions Home Page > Essential Classes > Exceptions «Previous•Trail•Next» Unchecked Exceptions The Controversy Because the Java programming language does not require methods to catch or to specify unchecked exceptions (RuntimeException, Error, and their subclasses), programmers may be tempted to write code that throws only unchecked exceptions or to make all their exception subclasses inherit from RuntimeException. Both of these shortcuts allow programmers to write code without bothering with compiler errors and without bothering to specify or to catch any exceptions. Although this may seem convenient to the programmer, it sidesteps the intent of the catch or specify requirement and can cause problems for others using your classes. Why did the designers decide to force a method to specify all uncaught checked exceptions that can be thrown within its scope? Any Exception that can be thrown by a method is part of the method's public programming interface. Those who call a method must know about the exceptions that a method can throw so that they can decide what to do about them. These exceptions are as much a part of that method's programming interface as its parameters and return value. The next question might be: "If it's so good to document a method's API, including the exceptions it can throw, why not specify runtime exceptions too?" Runtime exceptions represent problems that are the result of a programming problem, and as such, the API client code cannot reasonably be expected to recover from them or to handle them in any way. Such problems include arithmetic exceptions, such as dividing by zero; pointer exceptions, such as trying to access an object through a null reference; and indexing exceptions, such as attempting to access an array element through an index that is too large or too small. Runtime exceptions can occur anywhere in a program, and in a typical one they can be very numerous. Having to add runtime exceptions in every method declaration would reduce a program's clarity. Thus, the compiler does not require that you catch or specify runtime exceptions (although you can). One case where it is common practice to throw a RuntimeException is when the user calls a method incorrectly. For example, a