Bind Failed Error 125
Contents |
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss
Error Binding Socket Address Already In Use
the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about bind failed address already in use iperf Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions bind address already in use ssh Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other.
So_reuseaddr Example
Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Error: Address already in use while binding socket with address but the port number is shown free by `netstat` up vote 30 down vote favorite 8 I tried to bind my socket(server socket) at port number 8000. It worked and did the job for me. At the end of
Address Already In Use Socket
the code I close the socket as well. The very next instant I run my code again and it shows me that the address is already in use. I have printed the meaning of error values strerror(errno); to see if my code working properly at each point. To check if the port is free I checked it using netstat but it shows that port number 8000 is free. It has happened with me a lot of times. Every time I then wait for a few more secs and then it starts working again. I am using c language. So what is he reason for this behavior by my OS. After a few more secs I run the code and then it works. anirudh@anirudh-Aspire-5920:~/Desktop/testing$ sudo ./a.out Socket Creation: Success File open: Success Socket Bind: Address already in use Socket Listen: Address already in use ^C anirudh@anirudh-Aspire-5920:~/Desktop/testing$ sudo netstat -lntp Active Internet connections (only servers) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State PID/Program name tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:80 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1348/lighttpd tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:22
and both ends must ACK (acknowledge) each other's FIN packets. The FIN packets are initiated by the application performing a close(), a shutdown(), or an exit(). The ACKs are handled by the kernel after the close() has completed. Because of address already in use python this, it is possible for the process to complete before the kernel has released the associated
Describe How Bind Function Works.
network resource, and this port cannot be bound to another process until the kernel has decided that it is done. Figure 1 Figure 1 bind: address already in use mac shows all of the possible states that can occur during a normal closure, depending on the order in which things happen. Note that if you initiate closure, there is a TIME_WAIT state that is absent from the other side. This http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5106674/error-address-already-in-use-while-binding-socket-with-address-but-the-port-num TIME_WAIT is necessary in case the ACK you sent wasn't received, or in case spurious packets show up for other reasons. I'm really not sure why this state isn't necessary on the other side, when the remote end initiates closure, but this is definitely the case. TIME_WAIT is the state that typically ties up the port for several minutes after the process has completed. The length of the associated timeout varies on different operating systems, and may be dynamic on some http://hea-www.harvard.edu/~fine/Tech/addrinuse.html operating systems, however typical values are in the range of one to four minutes. If both ends send a FIN before either end receives it, both ends will have to go through TIME_WAIT. Normal Closure of Listen Sockets A socket which is listening for connections can be closed immediately if there are no connections pending, and the state proceeds directly to CLOSED. If connections are pending however, FIN_WAIT_1 is entered, and a TIME_WAIT is inevitable. Note that it is impossible to completely guarantee a clean closure here. While you can check the connections using a select() call before closure, a tiny but real possibility exists that a connection could arrive after the select() but before the close(). Abnormal Closure If the remote application dies unexpectedly while the connection is established, the local end will have to initiate closure. In this case TIME_WAIT is unavoidable. If the remote end disappears due to a network failure, or the remote machine reboots (both are rare), the local port will be tied up until each state times out. Worse, some older operating systems do not implement a timeout for FIN_WAIT_2, and it is possible to get stuck there forever, in which case restarting your server could require a reboot. If the local application dies while a connection is active, the port will be tied up in TIME_WAIT. This is also true if the application dies while a connection is pending. Strategies for Avoidance SO_REUSEA
from GoogleSign inHidden fieldsSearch for groups or messages
Get Kubuntu Get Xubuntu Get Lubuntu Get UbuntuStudio Get Mythbuntu Get Edubuntu Get Ubuntu-GNOME Get UbuntuKylin Ubuntu Code of Conduct Ubuntu Wiki Community Wiki Other Support Launchpad Answers Ubuntu IRC Support AskUbuntu Official Documentation User Documentation Social Media Facebook Twitter Useful Links Distrowatch Bugs: Ubuntu PPAs: Ubuntu Web Upd8: Ubuntu OMG! Ubuntu Ubuntu Insights Planet Ubuntu Activity Page Please read before SSO login Advanced Search Forum The Ubuntu Forum Community Ubuntu Official Flavours Support Networking & Wireless [SOLVED] cvsd: bind() failed: Address already in use Having an Issue With Posting ? Do you want to help us debug the posting issues ? < is the place to report it, thanks ! Results 1 to 4 of 4 Thread: cvsd: bind() failed: Address already in use Thread Tools Show Printable Version Subscribe to this Thread… Display Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode January 28th, 2010 #1 pullmoll View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message 5 Cups of Ubuntu Join Date Nov 2009 Location Germany Beans 21 DistroUbuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala cvsd: bind() failed: Address already in use I wanted to run cvsd on my Ubuntu 9.10 64bit installation. All I get is the error message from the subject, regardless which port I configure in /etc/cvsd/cvsd.conf. And of course the port is not in use before I try to /etc/init.d/cvsd start. Any ideas? DUH! Searching helps Last edited by pullmoll; January 28th, 2010 at 10:33 AM. Adv Reply March 12th, 2010 #2 scarf View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message Gee! These Aren't Roasted! Join Date Nov 2008 Beans 158 Re: cvsd: bind() failed: Address already in use what were your findings? i am getting a similar error with bootp: bootpd: error(3): bind: Address already in use Adv Reply December 27th, 2010 #3 Sugi View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message Extra Foam Sugar Free Ubuntu Join Date Apr 2007 Location ニッポ& Beans 719 DistroUbuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat Re: cvsd: bind() failed: Address already in use Sorry to bring up an old thread, but definitely pullmoll, you should post to t