Binding Error Address Already In Use
Contents |
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow error binding socket address already in use the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow
Failed Binding To Authentication Address Address Already In Use
Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of
Binding Error Sql
4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up bind failed. Error: Address already in use [closed] up vote 13 down vote favorite 8 I am new
Address Already In Use Python
in Socket programming,Linux ,C.. This is my Bind part of the Socket program //Bind if( bind(socket_desc,(struct sockaddr *)&server , sizeof(server)) < 0) { //print the error message perror("bind failed. Error"); return 1; } puts("bind done"); But it gives user-desktop:~/socket_programming$ ./server Socket created bind failed. Error: Address already in use I don't know how to fix this problem.. Please give me a solution.. c linux sockets share|improve this question edited Jun 17 at 8:30 address already in use linux Chaitanya Bapat 11815 asked Mar 4 '13 at 9:59 TamiL 1,09431230 closed as too localized by Nick, dandan78, BЈовић, EJP, Öö Tiib Mar 4 '13 at 12:08 This question is unlikely to help any future visitors; it is only relevant to a small geographic area, a specific moment in time, or an extraordinarily narrow situation that is not generally applicable to the worldwide audience of the internet. For help making this question more broadly applicable, visit the help center.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question. 1 Use a different port number? –Nick Mar 4 '13 at 10:01 2 Use an address that isn't already in use. –David Schwartz Mar 4 '13 at 10:02 I got it.. I choose different ports... Thanks for the help .. Thanks all. –TamiL Mar 4 '13 at 10:18 1 I faced the same issue when I closed the server program with client program still running. This put the socket into TIME_WAIT state. Here's an elaborate discussion of the problem: How to forcibly close a socket in TIME_WAIT? –Narendra Apr 5 at 6:10 add a comment| 4 Answers 4 active oldest votes up vote 12 down vote accepted The error usually means that the por
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies how to use so_reuseaddr of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company bind failed address already in use iperf Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges address already in use flask Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15198834/bind-failed-error-address-already-in-use Sign up Error: Address already in use while binding socket with address but the port number is shown free by `netstat` up vote 30 down vote favorite 8 I tried to bind my socket(server socket) at port number 8000. It worked and did the job for me. At the end of the code I close the socket as well. The very next http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5106674/error-address-already-in-use-while-binding-socket-with-address-but-the-port-num instant I run my code again and it shows me that the address is already in use. I have printed the meaning of error values strerror(errno); to see if my code working properly at each point. To check if the port is free I checked it using netstat but it shows that port number 8000 is free. It has happened with me a lot of times. Every time I then wait for a few more secs and then it starts working again. I am using c language. So what is he reason for this behavior by my OS. After a few more secs I run the code and then it works. anirudh@anirudh-Aspire-5920:~/Desktop/testing$ sudo ./a.out Socket Creation: Success File open: Success Socket Bind: Address already in use Socket Listen: Address already in use ^C anirudh@anirudh-Aspire-5920:~/Desktop/testing$ sudo netstat -lntp Active Internet connections (only servers) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State PID/Program name tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:80 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1348/lighttpd tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:22 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 984/sshd tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:631 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1131/cupsd tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:3306 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1211/mysqld tcp6 0 0 :::22 :::*
and both ends must ACK (acknowledge) each other's FIN packets. The FIN packets are initiated by the application performing a close(), a shutdown(), or http://hea-www.harvard.edu/~fine/Tech/addrinuse.html an exit(). The ACKs are handled by the kernel after the close() has completed. Because of this, it is possible for the process to complete before the kernel has released the associated https://forum.golangbridge.org/t/bind-address-already-in-use-even-after-listener-closed/1510 network resource, and this port cannot be bound to another process until the kernel has decided that it is done. Figure 1 Figure 1 shows all of the possible states that can address already occur during a normal closure, depending on the order in which things happen. Note that if you initiate closure, there is a TIME_WAIT state that is absent from the other side. This TIME_WAIT is necessary in case the ACK you sent wasn't received, or in case spurious packets show up for other reasons. I'm really not sure why this state isn't necessary on the other address already in side, when the remote end initiates closure, but this is definitely the case. TIME_WAIT is the state that typically ties up the port for several minutes after the process has completed. The length of the associated timeout varies on different operating systems, and may be dynamic on some operating systems, however typical values are in the range of one to four minutes. If both ends send a FIN before either end receives it, both ends will have to go through TIME_WAIT. Normal Closure of Listen Sockets A socket which is listening for connections can be closed immediately if there are no connections pending, and the state proceeds directly to CLOSED. If connections are pending however, FIN_WAIT_1 is entered, and a TIME_WAIT is inevitable. Note that it is impossible to completely guarantee a clean closure here. While you can check the connections using a select() call before closure, a tiny but real possibility exists that a connection could arrive after the select() but before the close(). Abnormal Closure If the remote application dies unexpectedly while the connection is established, the local end will have to initiate closure. In this case TIME_WAIT is unav
// ln is listening on :8080 err = ln.Close() // succeeds, no error if err != nil { log.Fatal(err) } ln2, err := net.Listen("tcp", ":8080") if err != nil { log.Fatal(err) // bind: address already in use } I was wondering if SO_REUSEADDR had something to do with this, but as far as I know, that is already being used under the hood in the Go standard library when creating a new tcp listener. Any ideas how I can re-bind to that address without delay? jdh (Joe Henke) 2015-11-14 18:40:19 UTC #2 Hey Matt, I tried to reproduce this and did not on my mac but did on the go playground. Where did this happen for you? Interestingly, both on my mac and on the go playground, if you use -addr="" or change to defaultAddr to "" in the source (which I think just means it will bind to any open port, yeah?) it will never rebind to the same port, and in fact will bind to the previous attempt's port + 1. Not sure if this is significant; I don't know precisely what binding to "" is specced to do. Joe matt (Matt Holt) 2015-11-14 19:09:42 UTC #3 Thanks for trying to reproduce it - next time I'll try to provide a full code sample I'm experiencing the Go playground's behavior on my Mac. But when I ran your test program on my Mac, it passed. I will look into this further in my own program. Meanwhile, I am intensely curious as to why the test fails on the Go playground... matt (Matt Holt) 2015-11-14 19:57:23 UTC #4 Okay, I've narrowed it down a little bit. This only happens for me when my program has restarted itself using exec.Command(os.Args[0], ...) and, in that command, it sets ExtraFiles to a list of file descriptors for listeners. (Similar to this method: http://grisha.org/blog/2014/06/03/graceful-restart-in-golang/) This lets the child process (itself) use the existing listeners without downtime. In the "restarted" process, then: I close the listeners, immediately create new ones on the same addresses again, and it fails with "address already in use". But if I pause 5 seconds after closing the listener (before creating the new listener), it succeeds. The original process where the listeners were created don't have this problem. In other words, if I don't "restart" the process, I can close and create the listeners immediately, like @jdh's program d