Proper Sources Of Error
Contents |
the measurement devices (hard to read scales, etc.) - Usually caused by poorly or miscalibrated instruments. - There are usually ways to determine or estimate. - Cannot reduce
Sources Of Error In A Chemistry Lab
by repeated measurements, but can account for in some way. 3. Indeterminate (Random) sources of error in physics Errors
- Natural variations in measurements. - May be result of operator bias, variation in experimental conditions, orTypes Of Sources Of Error
other factors not easily accounted for. - May be minimized by repeated measurement and using an average value. Experimental results may be described in terms of precision and accuracy. Precision - source of error definition relatively low indeterminate error.
- reproducibility. - high precision means a number of readings or trials result in values close to the same number. Accuracy - relatively low determinate error. - close to a true value. Accurate and precise Precise but not accurate Reliability- a procedure is said to be reliable if it may be completed with a high degree of sources of error in measurement accuracy and precision. For most of our investigations we will be concerned with the precision of results. Experimental Data and Measures of Uncertainty Quantities that give some measure of experimental precision are Deviation (individual values) Average deviation Average Deviation of the Mean (Standard Average Deviation) Sample standard deviation (sometimes denoted as ) Standard error It is customary to report experimental results with an uncertainty in the following form Result = Average ± uncertainty The uncertainty is one of the measures of precision given above (a.d., A.D., s, or Sx). For our present cases we will use standard error and report results as Result = Average ± Sx This information is simply preliminary to analyses we will be performing on some sample data, and data we will collect in the future. The idea here is to give you the formulae that are used to describe the precision of a set of data. We will see a bit more later. We need to see a calculation of these quantities. These pages illustrate one run through of calculations Another document will be about what these statistical quantities might tell us and hCelebrations Home & Garden Math Pets & Animals Science Sports & Active Lifestyle Technology Vehicles World View www.reference.com Science Chemistry Chem Lab Q: What are sources of error in a
Sources Of Error In A Biology Lab
chemistry lab? A: Quick Answer Errors in the chemistry lab can arise source of error definition biology from human error, equipment limitations and observation errors. Some other sources of errors include measurement values that are not well
Non Human Sources Of Error In A Chemistry Lab
defined and inconsistent experiment techniques. Continue Reading Keep Learning What are some sources of error in synthesis of alum from aluminum foil? What are some possible sources of errors in the http://www.ahsd.org/science/stroyan/hphys/stats/meas_uncert_1.htm lab? How do you prepare an answer sheet for a chemistry lab experiment? Credit: Cultura RM/Dan Dunkley Collection Mix: Subjects Getty Images Full Answer Human errors, such as measuring incorrectly, inadvertently contaminating a solution by dropping another substance into it, or using dirty instruments, are examples of how making a simple mistake affects the experiment. Equipment limitations also cause errors if instruments are not https://www.reference.com/science/sources-error-chemistry-lab-e62cc6cf8f29e393 calibrated properly or if an instrument is unable to take a measurement because of calibration limitations. For instance, a digital scale that only measures up to three decimal places is a potential limitation if a more exact measurement is needed. Instruments that are not calibrated for the conditions of the experiment also cause errors. Taking measurements during an experiment is another source of observation errors. For instance, a thermometer dipped into a hot liquid to take a measurement causes the temperature of the liquid to cool slightly. Although the drop in temperature is likely to be slight, the drop in temperature is, nevertheless, the effect of an observation error. Not all measurement values are well defined, which means that some items have a range of values rather than a single value. For instance, the mass or thickness of a piece of paper varies. It is important to be able to distinguish between the items that have variable values and the items that have definite values when conducting an experiment. It is possible to mistake an item with a variable value as an error. Finally, inconsistent sampling techniques also cause errors.
purpose of this section is to explain how and why the results deviate from the expectations. Error analysis should include a calculation of how much the results vary from expectations. This can be done by calculating the percent error http://sciencefair.math.iit.edu/writing/error/ observed in the experiment. Percent Error = 100 x (Observed- Expected)/Expected Observed = Average http://teacher.nsrl.rochester.edu/phy_labs/AppendixB/AppendixB.html of experimental values observed Expected = The value that was expected based on hypothesis The error analysis should then mention sources of error that explain why your results and your expectations differ. Sources of error must be specific. "Manual error" or "human error" are not acceptable sources of error as they do not specify exactly what is of error causing the variations. Instead, one must discuss the systematic errors in the procedure (see below) to explain such sources of error in a more rigorous way. Once you have identified the sources of error, you must explain how they affected your results. Did they make your experimental values increase or decrease. Why? One can classify these source of error into one of two types: 1) systematic error, and 2) random error. sources of error Systematic Error Systematic errors result from flaws in the procedure. Consider the Battery testing experiment where the lifetime of a battery is determined by measuring the amount of time it takes for the battery to die. A flaw in the procedure would be testing the batteries on different electronic devices in repeated trials. Because different devices take in different amounts of electricity, the measured time it would take for a battery to die would be different in each trial, resulting in error. Because systematic errors result from flaws inherent in the procedure, they can be eliminated by recognizing such flaws and correcting them in the future. Random Error Random errors result from our limitations in making measurements necessary for our experiment. All measuring instruments are limited by how precise they are. The precision of an instrument refers to the smallest difference between two quantities that the instrument can recognize. For example, the smallest markings on a normal metric ruler are separated by 1mm. This means that the length of an object can be measured accurately only to within 1mm. The true length of the object might vary by almost as much as 1mm. As a result, it is not possible to determine with certainty the exact length of the object. Another sour
it. In doing this it is crucial to understand that all measurements of physical quantities are subject to uncertainties. It is never possible to measure anything exactly. It is good, of course, to make the error as small as possible but it is always there. And in order to draw valid conclusions the error must be indicated and dealt with properly. Take the measurement of a person's height as an example. Assuming that her height has been determined to be 5' 8", how accurate is our result? Well, the height of a person depends on how straight she stands, whether she just got up (most people are slightly taller when getting up from a long rest in horizontal position), whether she has her shoes on, and how long her hair is and how it is made up. These inaccuracies could all be called errors of definition. A quantity such as height is not exactly defined without specifying many other circumstances. Even if you could precisely specify the "circumstances," your result would still have an error associated with it. The scale you are using is of limited accuracy; when you read the scale, you may have to estimate a fraction between the marks on the scale, etc. If the result of a measurement is to have meaning it cannot consist of the measured value alone. An indication of how accurate the result is must be included also. Indeed, typically more effort is required to determine the error or uncertainty in a measurement than to perform the measurement itself. Thus, the result of any physical measurement has two essential components: (1) A numerical value (in a specified system of units) giving the best estimate possible of the quantity measured, and (2) the degree of uncertainty associated with this estimated value. For example, a measurement of the width of a table would yield a result such as 95.3 +/- 0.1 cm. Significant Figures The significant figures of a (measured or calculated) quantity are the meaningful digits in it. There are conventions which you should learn and follow for how to expre