Error Trapping Sql Server Stored Procedure
Contents |
resources Windows Server 2012 resources Programs MSDN subscriptions Overview Benefits Administrators Students Microsoft Imagine Microsoft Student Partners ISV Startups TechRewards Events Community Magazine Forums Blogs Channel 9 Documentation APIs
Sql Server 2005 Stored Procedure Error Handling
and reference Dev centers Retired content Samples We’re sorry. The content you sql server stored procedure error handling best practices requested has been removed. You’ll be auto redirected in 1 second. Microsoft SQL Server Language Reference Transact-SQL Reference error handling in stored procedure sql server 2008 (Database Engine) Control-of-Flow Language (Transact-SQL) Control-of-Flow Language (Transact-SQL) TRY...CATCH (Transact-SQL) TRY...CATCH (Transact-SQL) TRY...CATCH (Transact-SQL) BEGIN...END (Transact-SQL) BREAK (Transact-SQL) CONTINUE (Transact-SQL) ELSE (IF...ELSE) (Transact-SQL) END (BEGIN...END) (Transact-SQL) GOTO (Transact-SQL) IF...ELSE
Error Handling In Stored Procedure Sql Server 2012
(Transact-SQL) RETURN (Transact-SQL) THROW (Transact-SQL) TRY...CATCH (Transact-SQL) WAITFOR (Transact-SQL) WHILE (Transact-SQL) TOC Collapse the table of content Expand the table of content This documentation is archived and is not being maintained. This documentation is archived and is not being maintained. TRY...CATCH (Transact-SQL) Other Versions SQL Server 2012 THIS TOPIC APPLIES TO: SQL Server (starting with 2008)Azure SQL DatabaseAzure SQL Data
Sql Stored Procedure Try Catch
Warehouse Parallel Data Warehouse Implements error handling for Transact-SQL that is similar to the exception handling in the Microsoft Visual C# and Microsoft Visual C++ languages. A group of Transact-SQL statements can be enclosed in a TRY block. If an error occurs in the TRY block, control is passed to another group of statements that is enclosed in a CATCH block. Transact-SQL Syntax ConventionsSyntax Copy -- Syntax for SQL Server, Azure SQL Database, Azure SQL Data Warehouse, Parallel Data Warehouse BEGIN TRY { sql_statement | statement_block } END TRY BEGIN CATCH [ { sql_statement | statement_block } ] END CATCH [ ; ] Argumentssql_statement Is any Transact-SQL statement.statement_block Any group of Transact-SQL statements in a batch or enclosed in a BEGIN…END block.RemarksA TRY…CATCH construct catches all execution errors that have a severity higher than 10 that do not close the database connection.A TRY block must be immediately followed by an associated CATCH block. Including any other statements between the END TRY and BEGIN CATCH statements generates a syntax error.A TRY…CATCH construct cannot span multiple batches. A TRY…CATCH construct canno
Procedure Input Parameters Output Parameters Try ... Catch Commenting Code Naming Conventions SET NOCOUNT ON DROP Procedure ALTER Procedure Get Free mysql stored procedure error handling SQL Tips Tutorial Items Introduction Creating Stored Procedures Simple Stored Procedure
Oracle Stored Procedure Error Handling
Input Parameters Output Parameters Try ... Catch Commenting Code Naming Conventions SET NOCOUNT ON DROP Procedure ALTER try catch in sql server stored procedure Procedure Get Free SQL Tips << Previous Next >> By: Greg Robidoux Overview A great new option that was added in SQL Server 2005 was the ability to https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms175976.aspx use the Try..Catch paradigm that exists in other development languages. Doing error handling in SQL Server has not always been the easiest thing, so this option definitely makes it much easier to code for and handle errors. Explanation If you are not familiar with the Try...Catch paradigm it is basically two blocks of code with your https://www.mssqltips.com/sqlservertutorial/164/using-try-catch-in-sql-server-stored-procedures/ stored procedures that lets you execute some code, this is the Try section and if there are errors they are handled in the Catch section. Let's take a look at an example of how this can be done. As you can see we are using a basic SELECT statement that is contained within the TRY section, but for some reason if this fails it will run the code in the CATCH section and return the error information. CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.uspTryCatchTest AS BEGIN TRY SELECT 1/0 END TRY BEGIN CATCH SELECT ERROR_NUMBER() AS ErrorNumber ,ERROR_SEVERITY() AS ErrorSeverity ,ERROR_STATE() AS ErrorState ,ERROR_PROCEDURE() AS ErrorProcedure ,ERROR_LINE() AS ErrorLine ,ERROR_MESSAGE() AS ErrorMessage; END CATCH << Previous Next >> More SQL Server Solutions Post a comment or let the author know this tip helped. All comments are reviewed, so stay on subject or we may delete your comment. Note: your email address is not published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk (*)
how you should implement error handling when you write stored procedures, including when you call them from ADO. The other article, Error Handling in SQL Server - a Background, gives a deeper description of the idiosyncrasies with error handling http://www.sommarskog.se/error-handling-II.html in SQL Server and ADO. That article is in some sense part one in the series. However, you can read this article without reading the background article first, and if you are not a very experienced user of http://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/34275/handling-exceptions-in-stored-procedures-called-using-insert-exec-blocks SQL Server, I recommend you to start here. In places there are links to the background article, if you want more information about a certain issue. Note: this article is aimed at SQL2000 and earlier versions of SQL Server. stored procedure SQL2005 offers significantly improved methods for error handling with TRY-CATCH. This article is not apt if you are using SQL 2005 or later. I don't have a complete article on error handling for SQL 2005, but I have an unfinished article with a section Jumpstart Error Handling that still can be useful. Table of Contents: Introduction The Presumptions A General Example Checking Calls to Stored Procedures The Philosophy of Error Handling General Requirements Why Do We Check stored procedure error for Errors? When Should You Check @@error? ROLLBACK or not to ROLLBACK - That's the Question SET XACT_ABORT ON revisited Error Handling with Cursors Error Handling with Triggers Error Handling with User-Defined Functions Error Handling with Dynamic SQL Error Handling in Client Code What to Do in Case of an Error? Command Timeouts Why is My Error Not Raised? Getting the Return Value from a Stored Procedure Acknowledgements and Feedback Revision History Introduction Error handling in stored procedures is a very tedious task, because T-SQL offers no exception mechanism, or any On Error Goto. All you have is the global variable @@error which you need to check after each statement for a non-zero value to be perfectly safe. If you call a stored procedure, you also need to check the return value from the procedure. In fact, this is so extremely tedious, so you will find that you will have to make compromises and in some situations assume that nothing can go wrong. Still, you cannot just ignore checking for errors, because ignoring an error could cause your updates to be incomplete, and compromise the integrity of your data. Or it can cause a transaction to run for much longer time than intended, leading to blocking and risk that the user loses all his updates when he logs out. In the first section, I summarize the most impo
log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Database Administrators Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ Database Administrators Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for database professionals who wish to improve their database skills and learn from others in the community. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top Handling exceptions in stored procedures called using insert-exec blocks up vote 9 down vote favorite I have a stored procedure that is called in an insert-exec block: insert into @t exec('test') How can I handle exceptions generated in the stored procedure and still continue processing? The following code illustrates the problem. What I want to do is return 0 or -1 depending on the success or failure of the internal exec() call: alter procedure test -- or create as begin try declare @retval int; -- This code assumes that PrintMax exists already so this generates an error exec('create procedure PrintMax as begin print ''hello world'' end;') set @retval = 0; select @retval; return(@retval); end try begin catch -- if @@TRANCOUNT > 0 commit; print ERROR_MESSAGE(); set @retval = -1; select @retval; return(@retval); end catch; go declare @t table (i int); insert into @t exec('test'); select * from @t; My problem is the return(-1). The success path is fine. If I leave out the try/catch block in the stored procedure, then the error is raised and the insert fails. However, what I want to do is to handle the error and return a nice value. The code as is returns the message: Msg 3930, Level 16, State 1, Line 6 The current transaction cannot be committed and cannot support operations that write to the log file. Roll back the transaction. This is perhaps the worst error message I've encountered. It seems to really mean "You did not handle an error in a nested tr